FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Array
Joseph Smith/Legal issues/Trials: Difference between revisions
< Joseph Smith | Legal issues
(mod) |
(m) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|link=Joseph Smith/Legal issues/Trials/1826 glasslooking trial/Con man | |link=Joseph Smith/Legal issues/Trials/1826 glasslooking trial/Con man | ||
|subject=Was Joseph found guilty of being a "con man"? | |subject=Was Joseph found guilty of being a "con man"? | ||
|summary= | |summary=It is claimed that Joseph was a "con man," and that he was found guilty of being such in a court of law. This refers to the 1826 trial. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}} | {{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}} | ||
Revision as of 00:53, 1 December 2013
Joseph Smith legal issues: Trials
| Answers portal |
| Joseph Smith, Jr. |
|
 RESOURCES
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
 PERSPECTIVES
|
 MEDIA
|
| OTHER PORTALS
|
Topics
1826 trial for "glasslooking"
Summary: Joseph Smith was brought to trial in 1826 for "glasslooking." Didn't Hugh Nibley claim that if this trial record existed that it would be "the most damning evidence in existence against Joseph Smith?"- Was Joseph found guilty of being a "con man"?—
Brief Summary: It is claimed that Joseph was a "con man," and that he was found guilty of being such in a court of law. This refers to the 1826 trial. (Click here for full article)∗ ∗ ∗
- Was Joseph found guilty of being a "con man"?—