Array

The Great Apostasy: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(26 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
====New Approaches to the Apostasy====
====New Approaches to the Apostasy====
In recent years, there has been a growing strain of Latter-day Saint scholars who have called for new approaches to the Apostasy. Some are concerned that traditional approaches&mdash;which have emphasized a dark pall of intellectual and spiritual rot that essentially covered all people from the death of the last Apostles to Joseph Smith's First Vision&mdash;are neither "pastorally productive," nor "intellectually defensible."<ref>Nicholas J. Frederick and Joseph M. Spencer, “[https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/remnant-or-replacement-outlining-a-possible-apostasy-narrative Remnant or Replacement? Outlining a Possible Apostasy Narrative],” ''BYU Studies Quarterly'' 60, no. 1 (2021): 106; compare Miranda Wilcox, “[https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/narrating-religious-heritage Narrating Religious Heritage: Apostasy and Restoration],” ''BYU Studies Quarterly'' 60, no. 3 (2021): 227. For more on these scholars' views, see the summary in John Gee, "[https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/ten-views-on-the-falling-away Ten Views on the Falling Away]," ''BYU Studies Quarterly'' 63, no. 2 (2024): 157&ndash;60.</ref>
In recent years, there has been a growing strain of Latter-day Saint scholars who have called for new approaches to the Apostasy. Some are concerned that traditional approaches&mdash;which have emphasized a dark pall of intellectual and spiritual rot that essentially covered all people from the death of the last Apostles to Joseph Smith's First Vision&mdash;are neither "pastorally productive," nor "intellectually defensible."<ref>Nicholas J. Frederick and Joseph M. Spencer, “[https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/remnant-or-replacement-outlining-a-possible-apostasy-narrative Remnant or Replacement? Outlining a Possible Apostasy Narrative],” ''BYU Studies Quarterly'' 60, no. 1 (2021): 106; compare Miranda Wilcox, “[https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/narrating-religious-heritage Narrating Religious Heritage: Apostasy and Restoration],” ''BYU Studies Quarterly'' 60, no. 3 (2021): 227. For more on these scholars' views, see the summary in John Gee, "[https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/ten-views-on-the-falling-away Ten Views on the Falling Away]," ''BYU Studies Quarterly'' 63, no. 2 (2024): 157&ndash;60.</ref>
The aim of this article will be to provide a narrative that is both intellectually defensible and pastorally productive.


====Defining the Apostasy====
====Defining the Apostasy====
Defining ''what'' the Apostasy actually was is a matter of great importance. Without this definition, we cannot assuage the concerns of those studying this topic. It is important to define the Apostasy using scripture.  
Defining ''what'' the Apostasy actually was is a matter of great importance. Without this definition, we cannot assuage the concerns of those studying this topic. It is important to define the Apostasy using scripture.  


The word ''apostasy'' comes from the Greek word ''ἀποστασία'' (ah-poh-stah-SEE-uh). The prefix ''ἀπο'' means "away", and ''στασίs'' means "standing." Thus, etymologically, we get "standing away" or "standing apart" as the meaning of the word. "The word means ‘rebellion,’ ‘mutiny,’ ‘revolt,’ or ‘revolution,’ and it is used in ancient contexts with reference to uprisings against established authority."<ref>Kent P. Jackson, ''From Apostasy to Restoration'' (Deseret Book, 1996), 6.</ref>
The word ''apostasy'' comes from the Greek word ''ἀποστασία'' (ah-poh-stah-SEE-ah). The prefix ''ἀπο'' means "away," and ''στασίs'' means "standing." Thus, etymologically, we get "standing away" or "standing apart" as the meaning of the word. "The word means ‘rebellion,’ ‘mutiny,’ ‘revolt,’ or ‘revolution,’ and it is used in ancient contexts with reference to uprisings against established authority."<ref>Kent P. Jackson, ''From Apostasy to Restoration'' (Deseret Book, 1996), 6.</ref>


In 2 Thessalonians, the apostle Paul said, "Let no man deceive you by any means: for [the Second Coming of Jesus Christ] shall not come, except there come a falling away ["''ἀποστασία''"] first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition" (2 Thessalonians 2:3).
In 2 Thessalonians, the apostle Paul said, "Let no man deceive you by any means: for [the Second Coming of Jesus Christ] shall not come, except there come a falling away ["''ἀποστασία''"] first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition" (2 Thessalonians 2:3).
Line 19: Line 21:
''Mass internal rebellion'' is the primary cause and central, defining feature of the Great Apostasy, but rebellion against what? Ultimately, it was a rebellion against key, essential doctrines taught by Christ and His Apostles. When we talk about someone who is an "apostate" or "apostatizes" from the Church today, we are usually referring to someone who is openly rebelling against the Church and its authority.<ref>General Handbook: Serving in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, “32.6.3.2 Apostasy,” The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed July 17, 2026, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/general-handbook/32-repentance-and-membership-councils#sec17.</ref> ''This'' is the best way to make sense of the Great Apostasy.
''Mass internal rebellion'' is the primary cause and central, defining feature of the Great Apostasy, but rebellion against what? Ultimately, it was a rebellion against key, essential doctrines taught by Christ and His Apostles. When we talk about someone who is an "apostate" or "apostatizes" from the Church today, we are usually referring to someone who is openly rebelling against the Church and its authority.<ref>General Handbook: Serving in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, “32.6.3.2 Apostasy,” The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed July 17, 2026, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/general-handbook/32-repentance-and-membership-councils#sec17.</ref> ''This'' is the best way to make sense of the Great Apostasy.


This mass internal rebellion was brought about by those who belong to the "great and abominable church": any person or organization that fights against the progress of the Church of God. The desires of the great and abominable church are for the following:
# Riches, luxury, and sensual indulgence (1 Nephi 13:7–8).
# Worldly praise/status (1 Nephi 13:9).
# To harm and control God’s people (1 Nephi 13:9).
# To pervert truth so people are spiritually blinded (1 Nephi 13:26–27).
# To lead souls away from God (1 Nephi 13:6; 1 Nephi 14:3, 9–10).
# To have wide dominion/influence (1 Nephi 14:11).
Some have conceptualized the loss of priesthood authority, the changing of ordinances, and the corruption of scripture as part of the definition of the Great Apostasy. However, these are merely ''symptoms'' of the internal rebellion against key, essential doctrines of the Gospel of Jesus Christ as taught by His Apostles. The rebellion against these doctrines led to the creation of many different Christian groups, each of which did not fully align with New Testament teachings on how Christ's Church should be run and what its members should believe. The creators of these sects thus become the ''perpetrators'' of the Great Apostasy, and other Christians who belonged to these churches became the unfortunate and unwitting ''inheritors'' or ''victims'' of it.
Some have conceptualized the loss of priesthood authority, the changing of ordinances, and the corruption of scripture as part of the definition of the Great Apostasy. However, these are merely ''symptoms'' of the internal rebellion against key, essential doctrines of the Gospel of Jesus Christ as taught by His Apostles. The rebellion against these doctrines led to the creation of many different Christian groups, each of which did not fully align with New Testament teachings on how Christ's Church should be run and what its members should believe. The creators of these sects thus become the ''perpetrators'' of the Great Apostasy, and other Christians who belonged to these churches became the unfortunate and unwitting ''inheritors'' or ''victims'' of it.


Line 24: Line 34:
If Christ's official, institutional Church was lost, then it must have been established. However, many today doubt that Christ ever established such a church.
If Christ's official, institutional Church was lost, then it must have been established. However, many today doubt that Christ ever established such a church.


The word that Greek uses to describe such a church is "ἐκκλησία" (eh-clay-SEE-uh). In the Gospel of Matthew, after Christ praises Peter for receiving his testimony of Christ from heaven, Christ says, "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build ''my church'' [μου τὴν ἐκκλησίαν]; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it" (Matthew 16:18, emphasis added). This is one of the most explicit pieces of evidence in the New Testament that Christ meant to establish a church. In the next verse, Christ says, "And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven" (Matthew 16:19). What does the language of "binding" and "loosing" refer to? Protestant scholars assure us that this refers to the power of the Apostles to permit and ban various forms of behavior among the covenant people.<ref>W.D. Davis and Dale C. Allison, ''Matthew: A Shorter Commentary'' (T&T Clark International, 2004), 270–71, emphasis in original; quoted in Robert S. Boylan, ''After the Order of the Son of God: The Biblical and Historical Evidence for Latter-day Saint Theology of the Priesthood'' (CreateSpace, 2018), 121–22. See also Oscar Cullmann, ''Peter: Disciple, Apostle, Martyr'' (SCM Press, 1953), 204–5; quoted in Boylan, ''After the Order'', 122. Finally, see Craig S. Keener, ''IVP Bible Background Commentary New Testament'' (Intervarsity Press, 1993), 90; quoted in Boylan, After the Order, 122.</ref> Matthew 18:18 confirms that all of the Twelve had this authority. This was the authority to establish doctrine for the Church (Acts 2:42). This authority is evident from the fact that one of the criteria for including a book in the New Testament canon was ''apostolicity''&mdash;that is, the characteristic of having been written by an apostle.<ref>Daniel Becerra, "[https://rsc.byu.edu/new-testament-history-culture-society/canonization-new-testament The Canonization of the New Testament]," in ''New Testament History, Culture, and Society: A Background to the Texts of the New Testament'', ed. Lincoln H. Blumell (Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University; Deseret Book, 2019), 780.</ref> The Apostles were also given power ("''δύναμις''" [DOO-nah-mees]) and authority ("''ἐξουσία''" [ex-oo-SEE-ah]) to cast out all devils (Matthew 10:1) and to cure diseases (Luke 9:1).
The word that Greek uses to describe such a church is "ἐκκλησία" (eh-clay-SEE-ah). In the Gospel of Matthew, after Christ praises Peter for receiving his testimony of Christ from heaven, Christ says, "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my ''church'' [''ἐκκλησίαν'']; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it" (Matthew 16:18, emphasis added). This is one of the most explicit pieces of evidence in the New Testament that Christ meant to establish a church. In the next verse, Christ says, "And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven" (Matthew 16:19). What does the language of "binding" and "loosing" refer to? Protestant scholars assure us that this refers to the power of the Apostles to permit and ban various forms of behavior among the covenant people.<ref>W.D. Davis and Dale C. Allison, ''Matthew: A Shorter Commentary'' (T&T Clark International, 2004), 270–71, emphasis in original; quoted in Robert S. Boylan, ''After the Order of the Son of God: The Biblical and Historical Evidence for Latter-day Saint Theology of the Priesthood'' (CreateSpace, 2018), 121–22. See also Oscar Cullmann, ''Peter: Disciple, Apostle, Martyr'' (SCM Press, 1953), 204–5; quoted in Boylan, ''After the Order'', 122. Finally, see Craig S. Keener, ''IVP Bible Background Commentary New Testament'' (Intervarsity Press, 1993), 90; quoted in Boylan, <i>After the Order</i>, 122.</ref> Matthew 18:18 confirms that all of the Twelve had this authority. This was the authority to establish doctrine for the Church (Acts 2:42). This authority is evident from the fact that one of the criteria for including a book in the New Testament canon was ''apostolicity''&mdash;that is, the characteristic of having been written by an apostle.<ref>Daniel Becerra, "[https://rsc.byu.edu/new-testament-history-culture-society/canonization-new-testament The Canonization of the New Testament]," in ''New Testament History, Culture, and Society: A Background to the Texts of the New Testament'', ed. Lincoln H. Blumell (Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University; Deseret Book, 2019), 780.</ref> The Apostles were also given power ("''δύναμις''" [DOO-nah-mees]) and authority ("''ἐξουσία''" [ex-oo-SEE-ah]) to cast out all devils (Matthew 10:1) and to cure diseases (Luke 9:1).


However, do the lone mentions of an "ἐκκλησία" in Matthew 16 and 18 establish that Christ meant to establish a church? Lothar Coenen expresses doubt in ''The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology'' that the uses of "ἐκκλησία" in the passages from Matthew 16 and 18 can be used to support the notion that Christ established an official, institutional church. They are indeed the only times in all the Gospels that "ἐκκλησία" is used. "In all probability," Coenen writes, "Jesus himself called together the Twelve, but did not found the 'ekklesia' as such in his own lifetime, not even through the institution of the Lord's Supper." However, "This by itself would not settle the question whether he intended the church to come into being."<ref>Lothar Coenen, "Church," in ''The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology'', ed. Colin Brown (Zondervan, 1981), 298.</ref> This should not threaten Latter-day Saint belief. If Jesus at the very least came, taught His people, won them as followers, performed His Atonement, and gave His Apostles both authority to baptize and a commission to baptize His followers after His Ascension, the essential Latter-day Saint belief that Christ established a church is preserved.
However, do the lone mentions of an "ἐκκλησία" in Matthew 16 and 18 establish that Christ meant to establish a church? Lothar Coenen expresses doubt in ''The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology'' that the uses of "ἐκκλησία" in the passages from Matthew 16 and 18 can be used to support the notion that Christ established an official, institutional church. They are indeed the only times in all the Gospels that "ἐκκλησία" is used. "In all probability," Coenen writes, "Jesus himself called together the Twelve, but did not found the 'ekklesia' as such in his own lifetime, not even through the institution of the Lord's Supper." However, "This by itself would not settle the question whether he intended the church to come into being."<ref>Lothar Coenen, "Church," in ''The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology'', ed. Colin Brown (Zondervan, 1981), 298.</ref> This should not threaten Latter-day Saint belief. If Jesus at the very least came, taught His people, won them as followers, performed His Atonement, and gave His Apostles both authority to baptize and a commission to baptize His followers after His Ascension, the essential Latter-day Saint belief that Christ established a church is preserved.
Line 48: Line 58:
One scripture frequently used is Amos 8:11. It says, "Behold, the days come, saith the Lord God, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the Lord."
One scripture frequently used is Amos 8:11. It says, "Behold, the days come, saith the Lord God, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the Lord."


The most extensive evidence of an apostasy is found in the New Testament.
The most extensive evidence of an apostasy is found in the New Testament.<ref>Noel B. Reynolds, "[https://scripturecentral.org/archive/books/book-chapter/appendix-c-new-testament-evidences-and-prophecies-apostasy-first-century-church Appendix C: New Testament Evidences and Prophecies of Apostasy in the First-Century Church]," in ''Early Christians in Disarray: Contemporary LDS Perspectives on the Apostasy'', ed. Noel B. Reynolds (FARMS, 2005), 355&ndash;69.</ref><ref>Kent P. Jackson, "[https://rsc.byu.edu/learn-me/new-testament-prophecies-apostasy New Testament Prophecies of Apostasy]," in ''Learn of Me: History and Teachings of the New Testament'', ed. John Hilton III and Nicholas J. Frederick (Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University; Deseret Book, 2022), 375&ndash;90.</ref>


=====New Testament Prophecies of the Demise of Christ’s Church=====
{|class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" vertical-align:top border="3" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
 
!width="25%"| <span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Scripture'''</span>
*Matthew 13:24–30
!width="75.0%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Reynolds's Description'''</span>
*Matthew 24:5, 24
|+<big><span style="color:#7BB375">'''New Testament Prophecies of the Demise of Christ’s Church'''</span></big>
*Acts 20:29-30
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
*Romans 11:19–21
|Matthew 13:24–30
*2 Thessalonians 2:3–4
||In the parable of the wheat and tares, Jesus describes the kingdom of God being filled with tares sown by his enemy, which are then allowed to grow until the harvest.
*1 Timothy 4:1–3
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
*2 Timothy 3:1–9, 12; 4:3–4
|Matthew 24:5, 24
*2 Peter 2:1–3
||Jesus prophesies to his disciples that before his time comes, many false prophets and false Christs or messiahs will arise, deceiving many.
*Revelation 13:7
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
 
|Acts 20:29-30
=====Evidences of First-Century Apostasy from the New Testament=====
||Luke records that Paul had called together the elders of the church in Ephesus to hear his farewell. He pled with them to take heed, for he knew that “grievous wolves” should come among them “not sparing the flock” (v. 29), and that even some of the elders themselves would “arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them” (v. 30).
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
*John 6:66
|Romans 11:19–21
*Romans 1:8–32
||Paul warns the Roman saints that just as apostate Israel had been cut off, so would the Christians should they fail to “continue in goodness” (v. 22).
*Romans 2:17–24
*Romans 16:17–18
*1 Corinthians 1:11–12; 3:4
*1 Corinthians 4:18
*1 Corinthians 5:1, 6
*1 Corinthians 10:14
*1 Corinthians 11:18–11, 29–30, 34
*1 Corinthians 14:1–37
*2 Corinthians 3:1; 72
*2 Corinthians 6:14–17
*2 Corinthians 11:3–4, 12–15
*Galatians 1:6–9; 3:1
*Galatians 4:8–11; 5:7, 15–22
*Ephesians 4:1–5:21
*Colossians 2:8–9, 18
*2 Thessalonians 2:7–9
*2 Thessalonians 3:6
*1 Timothy 1:3–4, 6–7, 19–20
*1 Timothy 5:15
*1 Timothy 6:1–10
*1 Timothy 6:20–21
*2 Timothy 1:8–18; 2:16–18; 4:14–17
*Titus 1:10–14
*Titus 2:1–15
*Titus 3:9–11
*James 1–2
*James 4:1–8
*2 Peter 2:1–22; 3:16–18
*1 John 2:9–27; 4:1
*3 John 1:9–10
*Jude 1:3–19
*Revelations 2–3
 
====Teeing the Ball Up: The Loss of Apostolic Authority====
Doctrine and Covenants 86 presents the Apostles as the original sowers of the gospel in the Savior's Parable of the Wheat and the Tares. According to the revelation, they planted the "good seed," but after they "fell asleep" (that is, after their deaths), the adversary sowed tares among the wheat, symbolizing the introduction of corruption and false teachings into the Church (Doctrine & Covenants 86:1–3). Unlike some earlier Latter-day Saint interpretations that suggested the wheat disappeared entirely, this revelation teaches that the wheat continued to exist alongside the tares until the last days, when the Lord would begin the work of gathering and separating them. Thus, Doctrine and Covenants 86 portrays the Apostles as faithfully establishing Christ's Church and attributes the subsequent Apostasy to the enemy's efforts after their ministry ended, while emphasizing that God preserved faithful believers ("the wheat") until the Restoration and the final gathering.
 
=====The Fate of the Apostles=====
The best historical scholarship available places the death of the last Apostle as early 100 AD and as late as 107 AD.<ref>Kurt Manwaring, "Fact vs. Fiction: How Did All the Apostles Die?" ''From the Desk'', July 4, 2026, https://fromthedesk.org/how-did-all-the-apostles-die/.</ref>
 
{|class="wikitable" vertical-align:top border="3" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Apostle'''</span>
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Location'''</span>
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Killed By'''</span>
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Reason'''</span>
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Manner'''</span>
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Source'''</span>
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Date'''</span>
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Historical Likelihood'''</span>
|+<big><span style="color:#7BB375">'''The Fate of the Apostles'''</span></big>
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Peter
|2 Thessalonians 2:3–4
||Rome, Italy
||Paul prophesies that Christ would not return before the “falling away” (v. 3)—the apostasy—and the son of perdition be exposed.
||Roman authorities under Emperor Nero
||Preaching Christ during the Roman persecution of Christians after the Great Fire of Rome in (c. AD 64–67).
||Crucified
||Tradition
||64–68 AD
||Moderate-High
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Andrew
|1 Timothy 4:1–3
||Patras, Greece
||Paul prophesies of future times when Christians will leave the faith and give “heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils; speaking lies in hypocrisy;... forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats.
||Roman governor of Achaia
||Refused to stop preaching Christianity.
||Crucified
||Tradition
||60 AD
||Low-Moderate
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|James G
|2 Timothy 3:1–9, 12; 4:3–4
||Jerusalem
||Paul speaks of a coming “perilous” (3:1) time when men, apparently affiliated with the church, will be wicked in so many ways, loving pleasures more than God. These “traitors” (3:4) will have “a form of godliness” (3:5), but they will deny the power that makes godliness possible in men. All that will live godly lives in Christ will suffer persecution (3:12). Apparently speaking again of these same traitors, Paul prophesies that in that future time, “they will not endure sound doctrine” (4:3), but will “turn away” (4:4) from the truth unto fables. And they will find teachers who will justify the indulgence of their lusts.
||Herod Agrippa
||To please certain Jewish leaders who opposed the Christian movement (Acts 12:1–2).
||Beheaded
||Acts 12
||44 AD
||High
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|John
|2 Peter 2:1–3
||Ephesus
||Peter prophesies not only that false teachers will come among the Christians, but also that many will follow “their pernicious ways" (v. 2).
||None
||Exiled to Patmos under Roman authority for preaching the Gospel (Revelation 1:9).
||Natural
||Tradition
||100 AD
||Moderate
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Philip
|Revelation 13:7
||Hierapolis
||John is shown in his vision that the beast will “make war with the saints, and ... overcome them.”
||Local authorities in Phrygia
|}
||Converted prominent individuals and challenged paganism.
 
||Crucified
{|class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" vertical-align:top border="3" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
||Apocrypha
!width="25%"| <span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Scripture'''</span>
||80 AD
!width="75.0%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Reynolds's Description'''</span>
||Low
|+<big><span style="color:#7BB375">'''Evidences of First-Century Apostasy from the New Testament'''</span></big>
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Bartholomew
|John 6:66
||Armenia
||Many of Jesus’s disciples left him because of his teachings.
||Armenian or local pagan rulers
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
||Converted members of the royal family to Christianity.
|Romans 1:8&ndash;32
||Flayed
||Paul congratulates the Roman faithful and contrasts their case with that of those Christians “who hold the truth in unrighteousness” (v. 18), but who by their sins of idolatry, murder, homosexuality, and fornication have changed the truth of God into a lie and will receive severe judgment.
||Tradition
||69–71 AD
||Low
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Thomas
|Romans 2:17–24
||Chennai, India
||Paul confutes the Judaizers in the church who exalt themselves as circumcised Jews and defenders of the law, while they hypocritically commit all kinds of grievous sin and blaspheme the name of God among the Gentiles by their bad examples.
||Local rulers in India
||Converted many people, including members of the nobility.
||Speared
||Tradition
||72 AD
||Moderate
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Matthew
|Romans 16:17–18
||Ethiopia
||Paul recognizes that there are already some Roman Christians who “cause divisions and offenses contrary to the doctrine” (v. 17). These appear to be smooth speakers who deceive the simple believers with their “good words and fair speeches” (v. 18), but not in the service of Christ, but rather to make a living for themselves.
||Local rulers
||Refused to stop teaching and converting people.
||Natural or Stabbed
||Legend
||68 AD
||Low
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|James L
|1 Corinthians 1:11–12; 3:4
||Jerusalem
||Paul describes the splintering of churches as church members begin to proclaim allegiance to different leaders, such as Apollos and Paul, rather than Christ.
||Jewish religious leaders
||Preached that Jesus was the Messiah
||Stoned
||Josephus
||62 AD
||Low
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Jude
|1 Corinthians 4:18
||Persia/Beirut
||Pride in the church at Corinth causes some to reject the words of the apostle Paul.
||Local authorities in Persia
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
||Missionary activities and conversions
|1 Corinthians 5:1, 6
||Beaten/Axed
||Fornication and incest are named as sins committed by, or perhaps between, church members.
||Apocrypha
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
||65 AD
|1 Corinthians 10:14
||Low
||Some Corinthian saints begin to engage in idolatry.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|1 Corinthians 11:18–11, 29–30, 34
||There are divisions and heresies among the Christians at Corinth. The Corinthians desecrate the sacrament by substituting for it pagan feasts. Because they take the sacrament unworthily, they eat and drink damnation to themselves, and many have been made weak and sickly or have even died for it. There are also other offenses which Paul hopes to straighten out when he comes.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|1 Corinthians 14:1–37
||There is confusion in the Corinthian church. Many are claiming to prophesy and to speak in tongues by inspiration. And the women, who should be silent, have joined in the fray. Paul pleads for good order and peace, which would be an indication that they were guided by God’s inspiration.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|2 Corinthians 3:1; 72
||Members begin to reject legitimate authority, and Paul’s credentials appear to be questioned.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|2 Corinthians 6:14–17
||Paul pleads with the Corinthians to separate themselves from the heathens with whom they seem to be joined in their lives. Specifically, they appear to be participating in idol worship at heathen temples.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Simon
|2 Corinthians 11:3–4, 12–15
||Persia
||Paul argues to the Corinthian church that they should follow him rather than those who come preaching another Jesus, or another spirit or gospel. Paul recognizes his own weaknesses, but these others “are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ” (v. 13). But if Satan himself can be “transformed into an angel of light” (v. 14), it is not to be unexpected that his ministers should “ be transformed as the ministers of righteousness” (v. 15).
||Persian or Roman authorities
||Preaching Christianity
||Sawn
||Tradition
||65–107 AD
||Low
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Judas
|Galatians 1:6–9; 3:1
||Jerusalem
||Local leaders and false teachers are changing the gospel of Christ and are preaching “another gospel” (v. 6) as the truth. Paul marvels that the Christians there are “so soon removed from him” (v. 6) to these teachers of other gospels, and he curses all who are preaching their own gospels.
||Himself
||After betraying Jesus, he died in remorse (Matthew 27:3–5; Acts 1:18–19 describes the aftermath differently).
||Suicide
||Math. 27 / Acts 1
||AD 30–33
||High
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Matthias
|Galatians 4:8–11; 5:7, 15–22
||Jerusalem or Colchis
||Paul bemoans the retrogression of the church membership for their disobedience, their backbiting among church members, and their observation of pagan and Jewish holidays. He calls on them to stand fast in their Christian liberty gained through the atonement of Christ and not to let themselves get entangled again with the works of the flesh—“adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like” (5:21)—of which he has warned them before. The sense is clearly that some significant part of the Galatian members have returned to their sinful ways.
||Jewish religious authorities
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
||For preaching Christ as the Messiah
|Ephesians 4:1–5:21
||Stoned or Crucified
||Paul describes for the Christians in Ephesus the kinds of lives, the unity, and spiritual consistency that they can enjoy, if they would live according to “the vocation wherewith [they] are called” (4:1). If they will heed his call, they can come to a “unity of the faith... unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ... [and] be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive” (4:13-14). In the process, he names a long list of sinful acts that are preventing them from leaving the world of the Gentiles and establishing a community of perfected saints. Paul calls them to stop walking “as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind” (4:17), with their “understanding darkened being alienated from God . . . because of the blindness of their heart” (4:18). As converts to Christ, they are taught to put off works of greediness and lasciviousness. They must put away lying, anger, stealing, bitterness, and evil speaking. He pleads with them to become “followers of God ... walking] in love” (5:1-2). If they would do this and be proper saints, such sins as fornication, uncleanness, covetousness, filthiness, foolish talk and jesting would never need to be named among
||Tradition
them. But whatever the vain men among them might say, “no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ” (5:5-6). But all things which are shameful even to speak of, that are being done in secret, shall be “made manifest by the light” (5:13). Again, he pleads with them that they be “not unwise . . . [and] drunk with wine” (5:17-18), but that they be filled with the Spirit.
||80 AD
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
||Moderate
|Colossians 2:8–9, 18
|}
||Paul writes to the faithful brethren at Colosse and encourages them to stand fast in the gospel of Christ that he taught them and not to heed the beguiling men who seek to spoil them through philosophy and vain deceit, after the traditions of men.
=====Scripture Outside the Model=====
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|2 Thessalonians 2:7–9
||Paul calls upon the Christians of Thessaly to withstand the strong delusions and lying wonders of their times. If they can stand fast, they will obtain the love and glory of Christ.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|2 Thessalonians 3:6
||Paul further notes that the Thessalonians are supporting disorderly busybodies who do not accept Paul’s epistles. He calls on local believers to separate themselves from such and not to support their leadership.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|1 Timothy 1:3–4, 6–7, 19–20
||Paul explains why he left Timothy at Ephesus to call upon those Christians who were teaching false doctrines, “fables and endless genealogies” (v. 4), which only raise questions without edifying. These teachings have caused some to swerve and turn aside “unto vain jangling; desiring to be teachers of the law” (vv.6-7) but without understanding. While among his own disciples, Timothy has been faithful, Hymenaeus and Alexander have blasphemed and “made shipwreck” (v. 19) of their faith, and Paul has delivered them to the buffetings of Satan.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|1 Timothy 5:15
||Paul advises Timothy about how to address growing domestic apostasies in the Church and acknowledges that through these problems, members have “already turned aside after Satan.”
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|1 Timothy 6:1–10
||Paul instructs Timothy on how to distinguish in the church between faithful teachers of godliness and those who are seeking the praise and riches of this world. The teaching of the latter group is marked by envy, strife, and “perverse disputings” (v. 5) that are destitute of truth. Those who love money rather than godliness “fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts” (v. 9).
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|1 Timothy 6:20–21
||Timothy is further warned to beware those Christians who profess the faith, but who are engaged in “profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science, falsely so called” (v. 20).
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|2 Timothy 1:8–18; 2:16–18; 4:14–17
||Paul writes Timothy to encourage him not to be ashamed of his testimony of Jesus or of his affiliation with Paul. He cites two prominent Christians by name as examples and complains “that all they which are in Asia be turned away from me” (1:15). He excepts “the house of Onesiphorus” of Ephesus who “refreshed” Paul and was “not ashamed of [Paul’s] chain” (1:16). Timothy is warned specifically to avoid “profane and vain babblings” (2:16); for they will increase unto more ungodliness, as in the cases of Hymenaeus and Philetus, who are teaching a false understanding of the resurrection. Further, Paul recites the specific case of a coppersmith who did Paul “much evil,”for he “greatly withstood our words” (4:14-15). And no one in the congregation would stand with Paul against him.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Titus 1:10–14
||Paul left Titus in Crete specifically “to set in order the things that are wanting” (v. 5). He is warned to be careful who he selects to be elders or bishops because “there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers . . . who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake” (vv. 10-11). Paul hopes that sharp rebukes may return them to soundness of faith, so that they will no longer give “heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth” (v. 14).
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Titus 2:1–15
||Paul exhorts Titus to set the church in order, as all age groups from both sexes need to be raised from inappropriate behavior, that Christ might “redeem [them] from all iniquity and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works” (v. 14).
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Titus 3:9–11
||Paul goes on to enumerate other failings of the members, which he seems to think can be corrected by Titus’s teaching. But he also recognizes the serious dangers of those who are focused on “foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law” (v. 9). If a man maintains his heretical position after being admonished a second time, Titus is to reject him as a sinner and subverter of others.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|James 1–2
||James recognizes that all are tempted and that the members of the church must not only speak the truth, but their lives must reflect comparable good works. Otherwise their religion is vain. In addition to other sins, he emphasizes the practice of despising the poor and ignoring the teaching of Christ to love their neighbor. For until their works meet these expectations of Christ, their faith is dead.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|James 4:1–8
||James describes “wars and fightings” (v. 1) among the Christians which arise from their own lusts. Calling them adulterers and enemies to God, he urges them to be humble and resist the devil, that God may cleanse their hands and purify their double-minded hearts.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|2 Peter 2:1–22; 3:16–18
||Peter warns the members against those of their own number who engage in all kinds of sins, including “damnable heresies” (2:1), covetousness, walking “after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness” (2:10), evil speaking, “having eyes full of adultery” (2:14). These have all gone astray. For having once escaped the world “through the knowledge of the Lord” (2:20), and becoming again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. They exemplify the proverbs of the dog that is turned to his own vomit and the washed sow that returns to wallowing in the mire (2:22). After discussing false teachings by scoffers in the church, he warns the members again not to wrest the scriptures or to be led away by the errors of the wicked, but to remain steadfast and grow in grace and in the knowledge of the Lord (3:16-18).
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|1 John 2:9–27; 4:1
||John warns the members that any who hate their brothers are in darkness. He warns them not to love the world, the lusts of the flesh or the pride of the eyes, as these things are “not of the Father” (2:16). For “even now are there many antichrists” (2:18), that arose from within the church. But now they deny the Father and the Son. But the anointing which the members have received can protect them from these seducers. Further, because there are many false prophets, James teaches those who would be faithful how to distinguish the true from the false.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|3 John 1:9–10
||A prideful and apostate local leader, presumably an elder or a bishop, rejects apostolic authority and even excommunicates those who stand up for the apostles.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Jude 1:3–19
||Jude writes to the faithful who he fears have been taken in by ungodly men who have crept in unawares, denying Christ and turning his grace into lasciviousness. Jude invokes the Old Testament and other writings as examples and prophecies of this kind of thing and calls the ungodly among them “murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men’s persons in admiration because of advantage” (v. 16).
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Revelations 2–3
||John sees the Son of Man, who commands him to write to the seven churches. Ephesus has done many good things, is now fallen and must repent, having left the Lord (2:5-6). The church in Pergamos has held fast against Satan, but harbors proponents of the doctrine of Balaam who eat meat sacrificed to idols and commit fornication. There are also Christians there who hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which the Lord hates (2:12-16). In spite of many good works, the church at Thyatira permits Jezebel to pass herself off as a prophetess while seducing the Lord’s servants to fornicate and to eat things sacrificed unto idols (2:18-20). There appear to be only a few members in Sardis who “have not defiled their garments” and who are worthy to walk with the Lord (3:1-6). Laodiceans focused on wealth, are comfortable and do not recognize their need for the Lord’s aid. They are neither cold nor hot, and the Lord will spew them out (3:16-17).
|}
 
====Teeing the Ball Up: The Loss of Apostolic Authority====
Doctrine and Covenants 86 presents the Apostles as the original sowers of the gospel in the Savior's Parable of the Wheat and the Tares. According to the revelation, they planted the "good seed," but after they "fell asleep" (that is, after their deaths), the adversary sowed tares among the wheat, symbolizing the introduction of corruption and false teachings into the Church (Doctrine & Covenants 86:1–3). Unlike some earlier Latter-day Saint interpretations that suggested the wheat disappeared entirely, this revelation teaches that the wheat continued to exist alongside the tares until the last days, when the Lord would begin the work of gathering and separating them. Thus, Doctrine and Covenants 86 portrays the Apostles as faithfully establishing Christ's Church and attributes the subsequent Apostasy to the enemy's efforts after their ministry ended, while emphasizing that God preserved faithful believers ("the wheat") until the Restoration and the final gathering.
 
=====The Fate of the Apostles=====
The best historical scholarship available places the death of the last Apostle as early 100 AD and as late as 107 AD.<ref>Kurt Manwaring, "Fact vs. Fiction: How Did All the Apostles Die?" ''From the Desk'', July 4, 2026, https://fromthedesk.org/how-did-all-the-apostles-die/.</ref>
 
{|class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" vertical-align:top border="3" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Apostle'''</span>
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Location'''</span>
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Killed By'''</span>
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Reason'''</span>
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Manner'''</span>
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Source'''</span>
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Date'''</span>
!width="11%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Historical Likelihood'''</span>
|+<big><span style="color:#7BB375">'''The Fate of the Apostles'''</span></big>
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Peter
||Rome, Italy
||Roman authorities under Emperor Nero
||Preaching Christ during the Roman persecution of Christians after the Great Fire of Rome in (c. AD 64–67).
||Crucified
||Tradition
||64–68 AD
||Moderate-High
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Andrew
||Patras, Greece
||Roman governor of Achaia
||Refused to stop preaching Christianity.
||Crucified
||Tradition
||60 AD
||Low-Moderate
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|James G
||Jerusalem
||Herod Agrippa
||To please certain Jewish leaders who opposed the Christian movement (Acts 12:1–2).
||Beheaded
||Acts 12
||44 AD
||High
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|John
||Ephesus
||None
||Exiled to Patmos under Roman authority for preaching the Gospel (Revelation 1:9), then made a translated being (3 Nephi 28:6&ndash;8; Doctrine and Covenants 7:2&ndash;3).
||Natural
||Tradition
||100 AD
||Moderate
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Philip
||Hierapolis
||Local authorities in Phrygia
||Converted prominent individuals and challenged paganism.
||Crucified
||Apocrypha
||80 AD
||Low
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Bartholomew
||Armenia
||Armenian or local pagan rulers
||Converted members of the royal family to Christianity.
||Flayed
||Tradition
||69–71 AD
||Low
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Thomas
||Chennai, India
||Local rulers in India
||Converted many people, including members of the nobility.
||Speared
||Tradition
||72 AD
||Moderate
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Matthew
||Ethiopia
||Local rulers
||Refused to stop teaching and converting people.
||Natural or Stabbed
||Legend
||68 AD
||Low
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|James L
||Jerusalem
||Jewish religious leaders
||Preached that Jesus was the Messiah
||Stoned
||Josephus
||62 AD
||Low
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Jude
||Persia/Beirut
||Local authorities in Persia
||Missionary activities and conversions
||Beaten/Axed
||Apocrypha
||65 AD
||Low
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Simon
||Persia
||Persian or Roman authorities
||Preaching Christianity
||Sawn
||Tradition
||65–107 AD
||Low
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Judas
||Jerusalem
||Himself
||After betraying Jesus, he died in remorse (Matthew 27:3–5; Acts 1:18–19 describes the aftermath differently).
||Suicide
||Math. 27 / Acts 1
||AD 30–33
||High
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|Matthias
||Jerusalem or Colchis
||Jewish religious authorities
||For preaching Christ as the Messiah
||Stoned or Crucified
||Tradition
||80 AD
||Moderate
|-
|Three Nephite Apostles
||New World
||None
||Asked Jesus to become translated beings
||Translated
||The Book of Mormon
||AD 33&ndash;34
||High
|-
|Nine Other Nephite Apostles
||New World
||None
||Asked to finish their ministry and then “speedily come unto [Christ],” and Jesus promised that after they were 72 years old, they would come to Him (3 Nephi 28:2–3). Mormon later summarizes: after about 100 years, “the disciples of Jesus . . . had all gone to the paradise of God, save it were the three who should tarry” (4 Nephi 1:14).
||Natural
||The Book of Mormon
||AD 33&ndash;AD 134
||High
|}
 
=====Scripture Outside the Model=====
 
=====The Apostle John and the Three Nephites=====
Some have argued that Latter-day Saints do not truly believe Apostolic authority ceased on the earth since Latter-day Saints also affirm that John the Beloved and the Three Nephites (who were ordained as members of the Twelve during Jesus's New World ministry) held such apostolic authority.
 
However, these men are now ''translated beings''. According to Mark L. McConkie, "Latter-day Saint scriptures speak of a unique class of beings, persons whom the Lord has 'translated' or changed from a mortal state to one in which they are temporarily not subject to death, and in which they experience neither pain nor sorrow except for the sins of the world. Such beings appear to have much greater power than mortals. All translated beings will eventually experience physical death and resurrection (MD, p. 807-808). Translation is a necessary condition in special instances to further the work of the Lord."<ref>Mark L. McConkie, "[https://eom.byu.edu/index.php?title=Translated_Beings Translated Beings]," in ''Encyclopedia of Mormonism'', ed. Daniel H. Ludlow, 6 vols. (MacMillan Publishing, 1992), 4:1485.</ref>
 
John the Apostle "desired [of Christ] that he might bring souls unto [him]," or "that he might do more, or a greater work yet among men than what he has before done" (Doctrine & Covenants 7:4-5). He was made "as a flaming fire and a ministering angel" to "minister for those who shall be heirs of salvation who dwell on the earth" (Doctrine & Covenants 7:6).
 
The Three Nephites were made to do a similar work that John the Apostle did. Prior to the great apostasy, Mormon records that they ministered unto "all the people," uniting and baptizing as many as would believe into the Church (3 Nephi 28:18). They apparently ministered unto Mormon and Moroni (3 Nephi 28:26; Mormon 8:11). The Lord took them away from the Nephites, though, because of their prevailing wickedness (Mormon 1:13). Mormon tells us that there would be a moment in the Lord's timetable in which they would again "minister unto all the scattered tribes of Israel, and unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people, and shall bring out of them unto Jesus many souls, that their desire may be fulfilled, and also because of the convincing power of God which is in them" (3 Nephi 28:29). By praying to God they can show themselves unto whomever seems good to them (3 Nephi 28:30).
 
Neither John the Apostle nor the Three Nephites were authorized to lead the Church during the Great Apostasy. Neither were given the authority to perform saving and exalting ordinances during the Great Apostasy. Both functioned as ministering angels. A ministering angel is not necessarily one that has to convert you to the religion. They can comfort you in times of affliction, annoyance, or discomfort. They can guide you and instruct you gently toward the light in moments of confusion. They don't have to baptize and convert you. John and the Three Nephites will remain in this state until they are resurrected.
 
John's and the Three Nephites' existence as ministering angels does not negate the Latter-day Saint belief in the loss of Apostolic authority or in the Great Apostasy.
 
====The Key Doctrines====
As mentioned before, the Apostasy was the result of key doctrines being rebelled against. Below, we explore some of the possibilities.
 
=====An Embodied God=====
By the 2nd century, Christians were teaching that God created the universe out of nothing. As observed by James Hubler,
 
<blockquote>Creatio ex nihilo appeared suddenly in the latter half of the second century c.e. Not only did creatio ex nihilo lack precedent, it stood in firm opposition to all the philosophical schools of the Greco-Roman world. As we have seen, the doctrine was not forced upon the Christian community by their revealed tradition, either in Biblical texts or the Early Jewish interpretation of them. As we will also see it was not a position attested in the New Testament doctrine or even sub-apostolic writings. It was a position taken by the apologists of the late second century, Tatian and Theophilus, and developed by various ecclesiastical writers thereafter, by Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Origen. Creatio ex nihilo represents an innovation in the interpretive traditions of revelation and cannot be explained merely as a continuation of tradition.<ref>James N. Hubler, ''Creatio ex Nihilo: Matter, Creation, and the Body in Classical and Christian Philosophy through Aquinas'' (University of Pennsylvania, 1995), 102.</ref></blockquote>
 
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatian Tatian] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theophilus_of_Antioch Theophilus] died by AD 185. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irenaeus Irenaeus] (191 AD), [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origen Origen] (253 AD), and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tertullian Tertullian] (220 AD) all died by the third century AD. This doctrine they taught contravened the Bible. John 17:3 teaches, “And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.” By not knowing the true God, the Christians certainly fell into apostasy.
 
=====The Mode of Baptism=====
Changes to the mode of baptism may also be viewed as evidence of the Great Apostasy because they altered the ordinance's symbolic connection to the atoning death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. The New Testament consistently portrays baptism by immersion as a reenactment of the Savior's burial and resurrection. Paul taught, "Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead...even so we also should walk in newness of life" (Romans 6:4; see also Romans 6:3–5). Going down into the water symbolizes Christ's death and burial, while rising from the water symbolizes His resurrection and the believer's new life in Christ.
 
This symbolism is more than an illustrative ritual—it teaches fundamental truths about the Atonement. Baptism unites the believer with Christ's redemptive work, signifying the death of the "old man" of sin and rebirth through the power of the Resurrection. Because the ordinance itself preaches the gospel, preserving its divinely revealed form is significant.
 
The earliest Christians generally practiced baptism by immersion where circumstances permitted, a practice reflected in the New Testament and supported by many early Christian writings. Over time, however, affusion (pouring) and eventually sprinkling became increasingly common, particularly in cases involving the sick, infants, or practical necessity, and later gained broader ecclesiastical acceptance. While many Christians viewed these developments as legitimate adaptations, Latter-day Saints see them as evidence that the original ordinance had been modified after the loss of apostolic authority.
 
From a Latter-day Saint perspective, the issue is not merely one of ritual preference but of preserving the doctrine embodied in the ordinance itself. If baptism is intended to represent participation in Christ's death, burial, and resurrection, then changing its mode necessarily weakens or obscures that symbolism. The Restoration's return to baptism by immersion under proper priesthood authority is therefore understood as a restoration of both the ordinance and the profound doctrine of the Atonement that the ordinance was designed to proclaim.
 
=====Closing the Canon=====
The widespread belief that the canon of scripture had permanently closed may itself be evidence of the Great Apostasy. Although the process of recognizing the books of the New Testament unfolded gradually over several centuries, by the fourth and fifth centuries, many Christians had come to regard the biblical canon as complete and closed, with no expectation of additional scripture or authoritative revelation.
 
Throughout the Bible, God consistently speaks to His children through living prophets, adding new revelation as circumstances require. The Old Testament was supplemented by the New Testament, and neither Jesus nor His apostles taught that God would forever cease revealing His word after the apostolic age. Instead, the New Testament encourages believers to "despise not prophesyings" (1 Thessalonians 5:20), to "covet to prophesy" (1 Corinthians 14:39), and teaches that Christ gave apostles and prophets "for the perfecting of the saints...till we all come in the unity of the faith" (Ephesians 4:11–13).
 
If God truly intends to guide His Church through continuing revelation, then the loss of that expectation represents a profound spiritual change. The conviction that God had finished speaking effectively removed the expectation of new prophets, new scripture, and divine direction for new circumstances. Latter-day Saints, therefore, see the doctrine of a closed canon not merely as a theological conclusion, but as a symptom of a Church that no longer expected or received the revelatory voice of God.
 
This perspective does not imply that God abandoned humanity or ceased inspiring individuals. Rather, it suggests that the institutional Church gradually lost the prophetic authority through which binding revelation for the whole Church was received. The Restoration's claim of continuing revelation and an open canon is therefore not an innovation but a return to the biblical pattern, in which God repeatedly declares, "Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets" (Amos 3:7). The Restoration's addition of the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and ongoing prophetic revelation reflects the conviction that a living God continues to speak to His children today.
 
=====Other "Plain and Precious" Truths Lost=====
* Three Degrees of Glory
* Baptism for the dead
* Faith and works
 
=====The Change of Covenants=====
Nephi mentions "covenants" that were taken out of the Bible. What could these covenants refer to?
 
BYU professors Nicolas J. Frederick and Joseph M. Spencer argue that the Book of Mormon presents the Great Apostasy primarily as the rise of ''replacement theology''—the belief that the Christian Church permanently replaced Israel as God's covenant people. They contend that the Book of Mormon emphasizes a ''remnant theology'', teaching that God's covenants with Israel remain in force and that Gentiles are invited to be grafted into those covenants rather than supplant Israel. They build this case primarily from 1 Nephi 13, arguing that the "plain and precious things" removed from the Bible largely concerned God's enduring covenant with Israel and its future gathering. They reinforce this interpretation with 2 Nephi 25–30, Jacob 5, 3 Nephi 16, 20, and 21, and Mormon 5, all of which emphasize Israel's eventual restoration and the centrality of the gathering of Israel in the last days. They also appeal to Romans 9–11, particularly Paul's olive tree analogy, along with the Abrahamic covenant in Genesis 12 and Isaiah's prophecies of Israel's restoration, to argue that both the Bible and the Book of Mormon teach that Gentile Christians become part of Israel's covenant family rather than replacing it. In their view, the Restoration restores this covenant-centered understanding of God's work, making the gathering of Israel—not merely the reestablishment of ecclesiastical authority—the defining answer to the Great Apostasy.<ref>Frederick and Spencer, "[https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/remnant-or-replacement-outlining-a-possible-apostasy-narrative Remnant or Replacement]," 105&ndash;27.</ref>
 
====Cherubim and a Flaming Sword: The Corruption of Scripture Guarding the Way Back from the Apostasy====
In 1 Nephi 13, Nephi sees that the Bible originally went forth from the Jews in purity, containing the "fulness of the gospel" and many "plain and precious" truths. However, after it passed through the hands of a "great and abominable church," many of these plain and precious parts were removed before the Bible reached the Gentiles. As a result, many people stumbled spiritually, became confused about essential doctrines, and fell under the influence of false traditions. Nevertheless, Nephi also sees that God would not abandon humanity: He would bring forth additional scripture—most notably the Book of Mormon—to restore many of the lost truths, establish the truth of the Bible as far as it had been preserved, and help gather Israel and bring people to a knowledge of Jesus Christ and His gospel.
 
Nephi's vision varies in claiming that many plain and precious things are taken out of the Bible (1 Nephi 13:29) or taken out of the ''gospel'' (1 Nephi 13:26). Nephi also mentions "covenants" that have been taken away (1 Nephi 13:26). These plain and precious parts were taken away by "the great and abominable church" so "that they might pervert the right ways of the Lord, that they might blind the eyes and harden the hearts of the children of men (vv. 26&ndash;27). Here, we have a clear distinction between the ''perpetrators'' and their ''unfortunate victims'' whom they have blinded and whose hearts they have hardened against the true church.
 
The great and abominable church sought to "pervert the right ways of the Lord" (v. 27). The angel tells Nephi, "Behold the gold, and the silver, and the silks, and the scarlets, and the fine-twined linen, and the precious clothing, and the harlots, are the desires of this great and abominable church" (1 Nephi 13:8).
 
The most thorough treatment of this topic was done by Latter-day Saint scholar and Egyptologist John Gee in a book chapter he authored in 2005.<ref>John Gee, "[https://scripturecentral.org/archive/books/book-chapter/corruption-scripture-early-christianity The Corruption of Scripture in Early Christianity]," in ''Early Christians in Disarray: Contemporary LDS Perspectives on the Christian Apostasy'', ed. Noel B. Reynolds (FARMS, 2005), 163&ndash;204.</ref>
 
====The Great Splintering: Patristic and Historical Evidence for the Apostasy====
Further evidence for the Great Apostasy can be found in the writings of early Christian fathers (the study of which is known as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patristics patristics] or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patristics patrology]) and Christian apocryphal writings.
 
When approaching these writings, it is important to keep their chronological context in mind. This helps in determining when the Great Apostasy might have been complete. Below is a series of tables that organize these writings chronologically and that can be viewed when desired.
 
===== Chronology of Early Christian Writings (A.D. 30–300) =====
This chronology includes the major surviving writings of early Christianity, including the New Testament, Apostolic Fathers, Church Fathers, apologetic works, church orders, martyr literature, biblical commentaries, Christian apocrypha, Christian pseudepigrapha, Gnostic literature, and important lost works.
 
{|class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" vertical-align:top border="3" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!width="6.3%"| <span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Approx. Date'''</span>
!width="6.0%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Author'''</span>
!width="8.3%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Work'''</span>
!width="7.3%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Genre'''</span>
!width="8.3%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Category'''</span>
!width="9.3%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Place of Composition'''</span>
!width="7.3%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Survival Status'''</span>
!width="10.3%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Principal Manuscript(s)'''</span>
!width="8.3%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Standard English Edition(s)'''</span>
!width="14.6%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Notes'''</span>
|+<big><span style="color:#7BB375">'''Chronology of Early Christian Writings (AD 0&ndash;AD 300)'''</span></big>
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 48–50
| Paul
| ''Epistle to the Galatians''
| Epistle
| New Testament
| Galatia or Antioch (disputed)
| Complete
| Codices Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Alexandrinus
| Nestle-Aland 28; Holmes; Loeb
| Earliest surviving Christian document according to most scholars.


=====The Apostle John and the Three Nephites=====
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| 50–51
====The Key Doctrines====
| Paul
As mentioned before, the Apostasy was the result of key doctrines being rebelled against. Below, we explore some of the possibilities.
| ''First Epistle to the Thessalonians''
 
| Epistle
=====An Embodied God=====
| New Testament
By the 2nd century, Christians were teaching that God created the universe out of nothing. As observed by James Hubler,
| Corinth
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Alexandrinus
| NA28; Holmes
| Earliest extant letter to a Christian congregation.


<blockquote>Creatio ex nihilo appeared suddenly in the latter half of the second century c.e. Not only did creatio ex nihilo lack precedent, it stood in firm opposition to all the philosophical schools of the Greco-Roman world. As we have seen, the doctrine was not forced upon the Christian community by their revealed tradition, either in Biblical texts or the Early Jewish interpretation of them. As we will also see it was not a position attested in the New Testament doctrine or even sub-apostolic writings. It was a position taken by the apologists of the late second century, Tatian and Theophilus, and developed by various ecclesiastical writers thereafter, by Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Origen. Creatio ex nihilo represents an innovation in the interpretive traditions of revelation and cannot be explained merely as a continuation of tradition.<ref>James N. Hubler, ''Creatio ex Nihilo: Matter, Creation, and the Body in Classical and Christian Philosophy through Aquinas'' (University of Pennsylvania, 1995), 102.</ref></blockquote>
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 51–52
| Paul
| ''Second Epistle to the Thessalonians''
| Epistle
| New Testament
| Corinth (traditional)
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| Pauline authorship debated by some scholars.


[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatian Tatian] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theophilus_of_Antioch Theophilus] died by AD 185. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irenaeus Irenaeus] (191 AD), [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origen Origen] (253 AD), and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tertullian Tertullian] (220 AD) all died by the third century AD. This doctrine they taught contravened the Bible. John 17:3 teaches, “And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.” By not knowing the true God, the Christians certainly fell into apostasy.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 53–55
| Paul
| ''First Epistle to the Corinthians''
| Epistle
| New Testament
| Ephesus
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| Addresses divisions, worship, resurrection, and ethics.


=====The Mode of Baptism=====
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 55–56
| Paul
| ''Second Epistle to the Corinthians''
| Epistle
| New Testament
| Macedonia
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| Collection of multiple Pauline letters according to many scholars.


=====Closing the Canon=====
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 56–57
| Paul
| ''Epistle to the Romans''
| Epistle
| New Testament
| Corinth
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| Paul's longest and most systematic theological letter.


=====Other "Plain and Precious" Truths Lost=====
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
* Three Degrees of Glory
| 60–62
* Baptism for the dead
| Paul
* Faith and works
| ''Epistle to the Philippians''
 
| Epistle
=====The Change of Covenants=====
| New Testament
Nephi mentions "covenants" that were taken out of the Bible. What could these covenants refer to?
| Rome (traditional)
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| Prison epistle.


BYU professors Nicolas J. Frederick and Joseph M. Spencer argue that the Book of Mormon presents the Great Apostasy primarily as the rise of ''replacement theology''—the belief that the Christian Church permanently replaced Israel as God's covenant people. They contend that the Book of Mormon emphasizes a ''remnant theology'', teaching that God's covenants with Israel remain in force and that Gentiles are invited to be grafted into those covenants rather than supplant Israel. They build this case primarily from 1 Nephi 13, arguing that the "plain and precious things" removed from the Bible largely concerned God's enduring covenant with Israel and its future gathering. They reinforce this interpretation with 2 Nephi 25–30, Jacob 5, 3 Nephi 16, 20, and 21, and Mormon 5, all of which emphasize Israel's eventual restoration and the centrality of the gathering of Israel in the last days. They also appeal to Romans 9–11, particularly Paul's olive tree analogy, along with the Abrahamic covenant in Genesis 12 and Isaiah's prophecies of Israel's restoration, to argue that both the Bible and the Book of Mormon teach that Gentile Christians become part of Israel's covenant family rather than replacing it. In their view, the Restoration restores this covenant-centered understanding of God's work, making the gathering of Israel—not merely the reestablishment of ecclesiastical authority—the defining answer to the Great Apostasy.<ref>Frederick and Spencer, "[https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/remnant-or-replacement-outlining-a-possible-apostasy-narrative Remnant or Replacement]," 105&ndash;27.</ref>
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 60–62
| Paul
| ''Epistle to Philemon''
| Epistle
| New Testament
| Rome (traditional)
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| Shortest Pauline letter.


====Cherubim and a Flaming Sword: The Corruption of Scripture Guarding the Way Back from the Apostasy====
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
In 1 Nephi 13, Nephi sees that the Bible originally went forth from the Jews in purity, containing the "fulness of the gospel" and many "plain and precious" truths. However, after it passed through the hands of a "great and abominable church," many of these plain and precious parts were removed before the Bible reached the Gentiles. As a result, many people stumbled spiritually, became confused about essential doctrines, and fell under the influence of false traditions. Nevertheless, Nephi also sees that God would not abandon humanity: He would bring forth additional scripture—most notably the Book of Mormon—to restore many of the lost truths, establish the truth of the Bible as far as it had been preserved, and help gather Israel and bring people to a knowledge of Jesus Christ and His gospel.
| 60–62
| Paul (traditional)
| ''Epistle to the Colossians''
| Epistle
| New Testament
| Rome
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| Pauline authorship disputed by many scholars.


Nephi's vision varies in claiming that many plain and precious things are taken out of the Bible (1 Nephi 13:29) or taken out of the ''gospel'' (1 Nephi 13:26). Nephi also mentions "covenants" that have been taken away (1 Nephi 13:26). These plain and precious parts were taken away by "the great and abominable church" so "that they might pervert the right ways of the Lord, that they might blind the eyes and harden the hearts of the children of men (vv. 26&ndash;27). Here, we have a clear distinction between the ''perpetrators'' and their ''unfortunate victims'' whom they have blinded and whose hearts they have hardened against the true church.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
 
| 60–62
The great and abominable church sought to "pervert the right ways of the Lord" (v. 27). The angel tells Nephi, "Behold the gold, and the silver, and the silks, and the scarlets, and the fine-twined linen, and the precious clothing, and the harlots, are the desires of this great and abominable church" (1 Nephi 13:8).
| Paul (traditional)
 
| ''Epistle to the Ephesians''
The most thorough treatment of this topic was done by Latter-day Saint scholar and Egyptologist John Gee in a book chapter he authored in 2005.<ref>John Gee, "[https://scripturecentral.org/archive/books/book-chapter/corruption-scripture-early-christianity The Corruption of Scripture in Early Christianity]," in ''Early Christians in Disarray: Contemporary LDS Perspectives on the Christian Apostasy'', ed. Noel B. Reynolds (FARMS, 2005), 163&ndash;204.</ref>
 
====The Great Splintering: Patristic and Historical Evidence for the Apostasy====
Further evidence for the Great Apostasy can be found in the writings of early Christian fathers (the study of which is known as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patristics patristics] or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patristics patrology]) and Christian apocryphal writings.
 
When approaching these writings, it is important to keep their chronological context in mind. This helps in determining when the Great Apostasy might have been complete. Below is a series of tables that organize these writings chronologically and that can be viewed when desired.
 
===== Chronology of Early Christian Writings (A.D. 30–300) =====
This chronology includes the major surviving writings of early Christianity, including the New Testament, Apostolic Fathers, Church Fathers, apologetic works, church orders, martyr literature, biblical commentaries, Christian apocrypha, Christian pseudepigrapha, Gnostic literature, and important lost works.
 
{|class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" vertical-align:top border="3" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
!width="6.3%"| <span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Approx. Date'''</span>
!width="6.0%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Author'''</span>
!width="8.3%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Work'''</span>
!width="7.3%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Genre'''</span>
!width="8.3%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Category'''</span>
!width="9.3%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Place of Composition'''</span>
!width="7.3%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Survival Status'''</span>
!width="10.3%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Principal Manuscript(s)'''</span>
!width="8.3%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Standard English Edition(s)'''</span>
!width="14.6%"|<span style="color:#0E98BA">'''Notes'''</span>
|+<big><span style="color:#7BB375">'''Chronology of Early Christian Writings (AD 0&ndash;AD 300)'''</span></big>
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 48–50
| Paul
| ''Epistle to the Galatians''
| Epistle
| Epistle
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Galatia or Antioch (disputed)
| Rome
| Complete
| Complete
| Codices Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Alexandrinus
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Nestle-Aland 28; Holmes; Loeb
| NA28
| Earliest surviving Christian document according to most scholars.
| Circular letter according to many scholars.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 50–51
| 62–64
| Paul
| Paul (traditional)
| ''First Epistle to the Thessalonians''
| ''First Epistle to Timothy''
| Epistle
| Epistle
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Corinth
| Macedonia (traditional)
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Alexandrinus
| Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus
| NA28; Holmes
| NA28
| Earliest extant letter to a Christian congregation.
| One of the Pastoral Epistles.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 51–52
| 62–64
| Paul
| Paul (traditional)
| ''Second Epistle to the Thessalonians''
| ''Epistle to Titus''
| Epistle
| Epistle
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Corinth (traditional)
| Macedonia or Nicopolis
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus
| NA28
| NA28
| Pauline authorship debated by some scholars.
| Pastoral Epistle.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 53–55
| 64–67
| Paul
| Paul (traditional)
| ''First Epistle to the Corinthians''
| ''Second Epistle to Timothy''
| Epistle
| Epistle
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Ephesus
| Rome
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Sinaiticus
| NA28
| NA28
| Addresses divisions, worship, resurrection, and ethics.
| Traditionally regarded as Paul's final letter.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 55–56
| 65–70
| Paul
| John Mark (traditional)
| ''Second Epistle to the Corinthians''
| ''Gospel according to Mark''
| Epistle
| Gospel
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Macedonia
| Rome (traditional)
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| NA28
| Collection of multiple Pauline letters according to many scholars.
| Earliest canonical Gospel according to the majority of scholars.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 56–57
| 70–90
| Paul
| Anonymous
| ''Epistle to the Romans''
| ''Didache''
| Epistle
| Church Order
| New Testament
| Apostolic Fathers
| Corinth
| Syria (probably)
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Codex Hierosolymitanus (1056)
| NA28
| Holmes; Ehrman
| Paul's longest and most systematic theological letter.
| Earliest surviving Christian church manual.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 60–62
| 70–90
| Paul
| Anonymous
| ''Epistle to the Philippians''
| ''Gospel according to Matthew''
| Epistle
| Gospel
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Rome (traditional)
| Antioch? (traditional scholarly proposal)
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| NA28
| Prison epistle.
| Probably dependent upon Mark and other traditions.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 60–62
| 80–90
| Paul
| Anonymous
| ''Epistle to Philemon''
| ''Epistle to the Hebrews''
| Epistle
| Homily / Epistle
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Rome (traditional)
| Unknown
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| NA28
| Shortest Pauline letter.
| Anonymous in the earliest manuscripts.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 60–62
| 80–90
| Paul (traditional)
| Anonymous
| ''Epistle to the Colossians''
| ''Gospel according to Luke''
| Epistle
| Gospel
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Rome
| Greece or Asia Minor (disputed)
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| NA28
| Pauline authorship disputed by many scholars.
| First volume of Luke–Acts.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 60–62
| 80–90
| Paul (traditional)
| Anonymous
| ''Epistle to the Ephesians''
| ''Acts of the Apostles''
| Epistle
| History
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Rome
| Greece or Asia Minor
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| NA28
| Circular letter according to many scholars.
| Second volume of Luke–Acts.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 62–64
| 80–95
| Paul (traditional)
| Anonymous
| ''First Epistle to Timothy''
| ''Epistle of James''
| Epistle
| Epistle
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Macedonia (traditional)
| Palestine? (disputed)
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| NA28
| One of the Pastoral Epistles.
| Traditionally attributed to James the brother of Jesus.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 62–64
| 80–95
| Paul (traditional)
| Anonymous
| ''Epistle to Titus''
| ''First Epistle of Peter''
| Epistle
| Epistle
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Macedonia or Nicopolis
| Rome ("Babylon")
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| NA28
| Pastoral Epistle.
| Petrine authorship debated.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 64–67
| 80–100
| Paul (traditional)
| Clement of Rome
| ''Second Epistle to Timothy''
| ''First Epistle of Clement''
| Epistle
| Epistle
| New Testament
| Apostolic Fathers
| Rome
| Rome
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus
| Codex Alexandrinus; Codex Hierosolymitanus
| NA28
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Traditionally regarded as Paul's final letter.
| Earliest surviving post-apostolic Christian letter.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 65–70
| 85–95
| John Mark (traditional)
| Anonymous
| ''Gospel according to Mark''
| ''Gospel according to John''
| Gospel
| Gospel
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Rome (traditional)
| Ephesus (traditional)
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| NA28
| Earliest canonical Gospel according to the majority of scholars.
| Distinctive theological portrait of Jesus.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 70–90
| 90–95
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Didache''
| ''First Epistle of John''
| Church Order
| Epistle
| Apostolic Fathers
| New Testament
| Syria (probably)
| Asia Minor
| Complete
| Complete
| Codex Hierosolymitanus (1056)
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Holmes; Ehrman
| NA28
| Earliest surviving Christian church manual.
| Closely related to the Fourth Gospel.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 70–90
| 90–95
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Gospel according to Matthew''
| ''Second Epistle of John''
| Gospel
| Epistle
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Antioch? (traditional scholarly proposal)
| Asia Minor
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| NA28
| Probably dependent upon Mark and other traditions.
| Shortest New Testament epistle by verse count.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 80–90
| 90–95
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Epistle to the Hebrews''
| ''Third Epistle of John''
| Homily / Epistle
| Epistle
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Unknown
| Asia Minor
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| NA28
| NA28
| Anonymous in the earliest manuscripts.
| Personal letter concerning church leadership.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 80–90
| 90–96
| Anonymous
| John of Patmos
| ''Gospel according to Luke''
| ''Revelation''
| Gospel
| Apocalypse
| New Testament
| New Testament
| Greece or Asia Minor (disputed)
| Patmos
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Sinaiticus; Alexandrinus
| NA28
| NA28
| First volume of Luke–Acts.
| Earliest surviving Christian apocalypse in the canon.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 80–90
| 90–100
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Acts of the Apostles''
| ''Odes of Solomon''
| History
| Hymns
| New Testament
| Christian Pseudepigrapha
| Greece or Asia Minor
| Syria
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Syriac manuscripts; Papyrus Bodmer XI (fragments)
| NA28
| Charlesworth; Lattke
| Second volume of Luke–Acts.
| Earliest substantial Christian hymn collection.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 80–95
| 95–120
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Epistle of James''
| ''Ascension of Isaiah'' (Christian recension)
| Epistle
| Apocalypse
| New Testament
| Christian Pseudepigrapha
| Palestine? (disputed)
| Syria or Palestine
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Ethiopic manuscripts; Latin & Slavonic fragments
| NA28
| Charlesworth; Knibb
| Traditionally attributed to James the brother of Jesus.
| Composite work containing an early Christian vision of Christ's descent and ascent.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 80–95
| 100–110
| Anonymous
| Ignatius of Antioch
| ''First Epistle of Peter''
| ''Epistle to the Ephesians''
| Epistle
| Epistle
| New Testament
| Apostolic Fathers
| Rome ("Babylon")
| Smyrna
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus; later manuscripts
| NA28
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Petrine authorship debated.
| One of the seven authentic letters written while en route to martyrdom.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 80–100
| 100–110
| Clement of Rome
| Ignatius of Antioch
| ''First Epistle of Clement''
| ''Epistle to the Magnesians''
| Epistle
| Epistle
| Apostolic Fathers
| Apostolic Fathers
| Rome
| Smyrna
| Complete
| Complete
| Codex Alexandrinus; Codex Hierosolymitanus
| Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Earliest surviving post-apostolic Christian letter.
| Emphasizes unity under the bishop.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 85–95
| 100–110
| Anonymous
| Ignatius of Antioch
| ''Gospel according to John''
| ''Epistle to the Trallians''
| Gospel
| Epistle
| New Testament
| Apostolic Fathers
| Ephesus (traditional)
| Smyrna
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus
| NA28
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Distinctive theological portrait of Jesus.
| Warns against false teaching.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 90–95
| 100–110
| Anonymous
| Ignatius of Antioch
| ''First Epistle of John''
| ''Epistle to the Romans''
| Epistle
| Epistle
| New Testament
| Apostolic Fathers
| Asia Minor
| Smyrna
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus
| NA28
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Closely related to the Fourth Gospel.
| Famous for Ignatius's desire for martyrdom.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 90–95
| 100–110
| Anonymous
| Ignatius of Antioch
| ''Second Epistle of John''
| ''Epistle to the Philadelphians''
| Epistle
| Epistle
| New Testament
| Apostolic Fathers
| Asia Minor
| Troas
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus
| NA28
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Shortest New Testament epistle by verse count.
| Encourages ecclesiastical unity.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 90–95
| 100–110
| Anonymous
| Ignatius of Antioch
| ''Third Epistle of John''
| ''Epistle to the Smyrnaeans''
| Epistle
| Epistle
| New Testament
| Apostolic Fathers
| Asia Minor
| Troas
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus, Vaticanus
| Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus
| NA28
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Personal letter concerning church leadership.
| Strong affirmation of Christ's true humanity.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 90–96
| 100–110
| John of Patmos
| Ignatius of Antioch
| ''Revelation''
| ''Epistle to Polycarp''
| Apocalypse
| Epistle
| New Testament
| Apostolic Fathers
| Patmos
| Troas
| Complete
| Complete
| Sinaiticus; Alexandrinus
| Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus
| NA28
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Earliest surviving Christian apocalypse in the canon.
| Personal letter to Polycarp of Smyrna.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 90–100
| 100–120
| Anonymous
| Polycarp of Smyrna
| ''Odes of Solomon''
| ''Epistle to the Philippians''
| Hymns
| Epistle
| Christian Pseudepigrapha
| Apostolic Fathers
| Syria
| Smyrna
| Complete
| Complete
| Syriac manuscripts; Papyrus Bodmer XI (fragments)
| Codex Vaticanus Graecus 859; later manuscripts
| Charlesworth; Lattke
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Earliest substantial Christian hymn collection.
| Frequently quotes New Testament writings.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 100–130
| Papias of Hierapolis
| ''Exposition of the Sayings of the Lord''
| Commentary
| Apostolic Fathers
| Hierapolis
| Fragmentary
| Preserved principally in Eusebius
| Holmes (fragments); Ehrman
| Earliest extant discussion of the origins of Matthew and Mark.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 95–120
| 100–130
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Ascension of Isaiah'' (Christian recension)
| ''Shepherd of Hermas''
| Apocalypse
| Apocalypse / Parable
| Christian Pseudepigrapha
| Apostolic Fathers
| Syria or Palestine
| Rome
| Complete
| Complete
| Ethiopic manuscripts; Latin & Slavonic fragments
| Codex Sinaiticus; Codex Athous
| Charlesworth; Knibb
| Holmes; Ehrman
| Composite work containing an early Christian vision of Christ's descent and ascent.
| Highly regarded by many second-century Christians.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 100–110
| 100–130
| Ignatius of Antioch
| Anonymous
| ''Epistle to the Ephesians''
| ''Gospel of the Hebrews''
| Epistle
| Gospel
| Apostolic Fathers
| Christian Apocrypha
| Smyrna
| Egypt or Syria
| Complete
| Fragmentary
| Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus; later manuscripts
| Quotations in Jerome and others
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| One of the seven authentic letters written while en route to martyrdom.
| Used by some Jewish-Christian communities.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 100–110
| 100–130
| Ignatius of Antioch
| Anonymous
| ''Epistle to the Magnesians''
| ''Gospel of the Nazarenes''
| Epistle
| Gospel
| Apostolic Fathers
| Christian Apocrypha
| Smyrna
| Syria
| Complete
| Fragmentary
| Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus
| Quotations in Jerome
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| Emphasizes unity under the bishop.
| Closely related to Matthew.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 100–110
| 100–130
| Ignatius of Antioch
| Anonymous
| ''Epistle to the Trallians''
| ''Gospel of the Ebionites''
| Epistle
| Gospel Harmony
| Apostolic Fathers
| Christian Apocrypha
| Smyrna
| Transjordan or Syria
| Complete
| Fragmentary
| Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus
| Quotations in Epiphanius
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| Warns against false teaching.
| Omits the infancy narratives.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 100–110
| 110–135
| Ignatius of Antioch
| Anonymous
| ''Epistle to the Romans''
| ''Apocalypse of Peter''
| Epistle
| Apocalypse
| Apostolic Fathers
| Christian Apocrypha
| Smyrna
| Egypt
| Complete
| Partial (Greek); Complete (Ethiopic recension)
| Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus
| Akhmim Codex; Ethiopic manuscripts
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| Famous for Ignatius's desire for martyrdom.
| Widely read in the second century and included in some early canon lists.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 110–140
| Anonymous
| ''Preaching of Peter'' (''Kerygma Petrou'')
| Apologetic Treatise
| Christian Apocrypha
| Alexandria (possibly)
| Fragmentary
| Clement of Alexandria and others
| Schneemelcher
| Survives only in quotations.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 100–110
| 120–135
| Ignatius of Antioch
| Anonymous
| ''Epistle to the Philadelphians''
| ''Epistle of Barnabas''
| Epistle
| Epistle
| Apostolic Fathers
| Apostolic Fathers
| Troas
| Alexandria
| Complete
| Complete
| Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus
| Codex Sinaiticus
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Encourages ecclesiastical unity.
| Presents an allegorical interpretation of the Old Testament.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 125–140
| Quadratus of Athens
| ''Apology''
| Apology
| Apologetic
| Athens
| Fragmentary
| Preserved in Eusebius
| Ehrman
| Earliest known Christian apology.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 100–110
| 125–145
| Ignatius of Antioch
| Aristides of Athens
| ''Epistle to the Smyrnaeans''
| ''Apology''
| Epistle
| Apology
| Apostolic Fathers
| Apologetic
| Troas
| Athens
| Complete
| Complete
| Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus
| Syriac manuscript; Armenian version
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| ANF; Ehrman
| Strong affirmation of Christ's true humanity.
| Addressed to Emperor Hadrian or Antoninus Pius.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 100–110
| 130–150
| Ignatius of Antioch
| Hegesippus
| ''Epistle to Polycarp''
| ''Memoirs'' (''Hypomnemata'')
| Epistle
| Church History
| Apostolic Fathers
| Patristic
| Troas
| Probably Rome
| Fragmentary
| Preserved in Eusebius
| ANF (fragments)
| One of the earliest Christian historical works.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 135–150
| Anonymous
| ''Protoevangelium of James''
| Infancy Gospel
| Christian Apocrypha
| Egypt or Syria
| Complete
| Complete
| Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus
| Bodmer Papyrus V; numerous later manuscripts
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| Personal letter to Polycarp of Smyrna.
| Principal source for later traditions concerning Mary's childhood.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 100–120
| c. 140
| Polycarp of Smyrna
| Marcion
| ''Epistle to the Philippians''
| ''Antitheses''
| Epistle
| Theological Treatise
| Apostolic Fathers
| Heterodox
| Smyrna
| Rome
| Complete
| Lost
| Codex Vaticanus Graecus 859; later manuscripts
| Reconstructed from patristic quotations
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| Harnack
| Frequently quotes New Testament writings.
| Contrasted the God of the Old Testament with the Father of Jesus.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 100–130
| c. 140
| Papias of Hierapolis
| Marcion
| ''Exposition of the Sayings of the Lord''
| ''Evangelion'' (Marcion's Gospel)
| Commentary
| Gospel
| Apostolic Fathers
| Heterodox
| Hierapolis
| Rome
| Fragmentary
| Reconstructed
| Preserved principally in Eusebius
| Patristic quotations
| Holmes (fragments); Ehrman
| Harnack; Roth
| Earliest extant discussion of the origins of Matthew and Mark.
| Edited form of the Gospel of Luke according to the majority view.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 100–130
| 140–170
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Shepherd of Hermas''
| ''Gospel of Mary''
| Apocalypse / Parable
| Dialogue Gospel
| Apostolic Fathers
| Christian Apocrypha
| Rome
| Egypt
| Complete
| Partial
| Codex Sinaiticus; Codex Athous
| Berlin Codex; Rylands Papyrus 463
| Holmes; Ehrman
| Meyer; Elliott
| Highly regarded by many second-century Christians.
| Centers on post-resurrection revelations to Mary Magdalene.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 100–130
| 140–180
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Gospel of the Hebrews''
| ''Gospel of Thomas''
| Gospel
| Sayings Gospel
| Christian Apocrypha
| Christian Apocrypha
| Egypt or Syria
| Syria  
| Fragmentary
| Complete
| Quotations in Jerome and others
| Nag Hammadi Codex II; Oxyrhynchus papyri
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| Meyer; Patterson & Robinson
| Used by some Jewish-Christian communities.
| Collection of 114 sayings attributed to Jesus.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 100–130
| 140–180
| Anonymous
| Valentinian school
| ''Gospel of the Nazarenes''
| ''Gospel of Truth''
| Gospel
| Homily / Gospel
| Christian Apocrypha
| Gnostic Literature
| Syria
| Rome or Alexandria
| Fragmentary
| Complete
| Quotations in Jerome
| Nag Hammadi Codex I
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| Meyer; Robinson
| Closely related to Matthew.
| Often attributed to Valentinus or one of his followers.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 100–130
| 140–180
| Anonymous
| Valentinian school
| ''Gospel of the Ebionites''
| ''Gospel of Philip''
| Gospel Harmony
| Sacramental Treatise
| Christian Apocrypha
| Gnostic Literature
| Transjordan or Syria
| Egypt
| Fragmentary
| Complete
| Quotations in Epiphanius
| Nag Hammadi Codex II
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| Meyer; Robinson
| Omits the infancy narratives.
| Collection of mystical sayings concerning sacraments and union with Christ.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 110–135
| 145–160
| Anonymous
| Justin Martyr
| ''Apocalypse of Peter''
| ''First Apology''
| Apocalypse
| Apology
| Christian Apocrypha
| Apologetic
| Egypt
| Rome
| Partial (Greek); Complete (Ethiopic recension)
| Complete
| Akhmim Codex; Ethiopic manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| ANF; Falls
| Widely read in the second century and included in some early canon lists.
| Defense of Christianity addressed to Antoninus Pius.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 110–140
| c. 150
| Anonymous
| Justin Martyr
| ''Preaching of Peter'' (''Kerygma Petrou'')
| ''Second Apology''
| Apologetic Treatise
| Apology
| Christian Apocrypha
| Apologetic
| Alexandria (possibly)
| Rome
| Fragmentary
| Complete
| Clement of Alexandria and others
| Medieval manuscripts
| Schneemelcher
| ANF; Falls
| Survives only in quotations.
| Supplement to the ''First Apology''.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 120–135
| 150–160
| Anonymous
| Justin Martyr
| ''Epistle of Barnabas''
| ''Dialogue with Trypho''
| Epistle
| Dialogue
| Apostolic Fathers
| Apologetic
| Alexandria
| Ephesus or Rome
| Complete
| Complete
| Codex Sinaiticus
| Medieval manuscripts
| Holmes; Lightfoot
| ANF; Falls
| Presents an allegorical interpretation of the Old Testament.
| Lengthy defense of Christianity against Jewish objections.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 125–140
| 145–170
| Quadratus of Athens
| Anonymous
| ''Apology''
| ''Acts of John''
| Apology
| Acts
| Apologetic
| Christian Apocrypha
| Athens
| Asia Minor
| Fragmentary
| Partial
| Preserved in Eusebius
| Numerous Greek manuscripts
| Ehrman
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| Earliest known Christian apology.
| Earliest of the major apocryphal Acts.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 125–145
| 150–160
| Aristides of Athens
| Tatian
| ''Apology''
| ''Address to the Greeks''
| Apology
| Apology
| Apologetic
| Apologetic
| Athens
| Rome
| Complete
| Complete
| Syriac manuscript; Armenian version
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF; Ehrman
| ANF
| Addressed to Emperor Hadrian or Antoninus Pius.
| Critique of Greek philosophy and culture.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 130–150
| 160–172
| Hegesippus
| Tatian
| ''Memoirs'' (''Hypomnemata'')
| ''Diatessaron''
| Church History
| Gospel Harmony
| Patristic
| Gospel Harmony
| Probably Rome
| Syria
| Fragmentary
| Lost (reconstructed)
| Preserved in Eusebius
| Ephrem's Commentary; Arabic and Latin witnesses
| ANF (fragments)
| Petersen; Hill
| One of the earliest Christian historical works.
| Earliest known harmony of the four canonical Gospels.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 135–150
| c. 165
| Anonymous
| Melito of Sardis
| ''Protoevangelium of James''
| ''On Pascha''
| Infancy Gospel
| Homily
| Christian Apocrypha
| Patristic
| Egypt or Syria
| Sardis
| Complete
| Complete
| Bodmer Papyrus V; numerous later manuscripts
| Papyrus Chester Beatty-Michigan
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| Hall; ANF (partial)
| Principal source for later traditions concerning Mary's childhood.
| Earliest surviving Christian Paschal homily.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 140
| 165–180
| Marcion
| Melito of Sardis
| ''Antitheses''
| ''Apology''
| Theological Treatise
| Apology
| Heterodox
| Apologetic
| Rome
| Sardis
| Lost
| Fragmentary
| Reconstructed from patristic quotations
| Eusebius
| Harnack
| Hall
| Contrasted the God of the Old Testament with the Father of Jesus.
| Addressed to Emperor Marcus Aurelius.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 140
| 165–180
| Marcion
| Melito of Sardis
| ''Evangelion'' (Marcion's Gospel)
| ''Extracts'' (''Eklogai'')
| Gospel
| Biblical Commentary
| Heterodox
| Biblical Commentary
| Rome
| Sardis
| Reconstructed
| Fragmentary
| Patristic quotations
| Catenae and patristic citations
| Harnack; Roth
| Hall
| Edited form of the Gospel of Luke according to the majority view.
| Collection of scriptural interpretations.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 140–170
| 165–177
| Anonymous
| Athenagoras of Athens
| ''Gospel of Mary''
| ''Plea for the Christians''
| Dialogue Gospel
| Apology
| Christian Apocrypha
| Apologetic
| Egypt
| Athens (probably)
| Partial
| Complete
| Berlin Codex; Rylands Papyrus 463
| Medieval manuscripts
| Meyer; Elliott
| ANF
| Centers on post-resurrection revelations to Mary Magdalene.
| Defense of Christians addressed to Marcus Aurelius and Commodus.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 140–180
| c. 177
| Anonymous
| Athenagoras of Athens
| ''Gospel of Thomas''
| ''On the Resurrection of the Dead''
| Sayings Gospel
| Treatise
| Christian Apocrypha
| Patristic
| Syria
| Athens
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex II; Oxyrhynchus papyri
| Medieval manuscripts
| Meyer; Patterson & Robinson
| ANF
| Collection of 114 sayings attributed to Jesus.
| Earliest full-length defense of bodily resurrection.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 140–180
| 169–183
| Valentinian school
| Theophilus of Antioch
| ''Gospel of Truth''
| ''To Autolycus''
| Homily / Gospel
| Apology
| Gnostic Literature
| Apologetic
| Rome or Alexandria
| Antioch
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex I
| Medieval manuscripts
| Meyer; Robinson
| ANF
| Often attributed to Valentinus or one of his followers.
| First known Christian author to use the word "Trinity" (Trias).


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 140–180
| c. 170
| Valentinian school
| Anonymous
| ''Gospel of Philip''
| ''Muratorian Fragment''
| Sacramental Treatise
| Canon List
| Gnostic Literature
| Canonical Literature
| Egypt
| Rome
| Complete
| Fragmentary
| Nag Hammadi Codex II
| Codex Ambrosianus
| Meyer; Robinson
| Metzger
| Collection of mystical sayings concerning sacraments and union with Christ.
| Earliest surviving list of New Testament books.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 145–160
| 170–180
| Justin Martyr
| Anonymous
| ''First Apology''
| ''Letter of the Churches of Lyons and Vienne''
| Apology
| Martyr Account
| Apologetic
| Martyr Literature
| Rome
| Gaul
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Preserved in Eusebius
| ANF; Falls
| Musurillo
| Defense of Christianity addressed to Antoninus Pius.
| Documents the persecution under Marcus Aurelius.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 150
| c. 177
| Justin Martyr
| Anonymous
| ''Second Apology''
| ''Martyrdom of Pionius''
| Apology
| Martyr Account
| Apologetic
| Martyr Literature
| Rome
| Smyrna
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF; Falls
| Musurillo
| Supplement to the ''First Apology''.
| Traditional date disputed by some scholars.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 150–160
| 175–185
| Justin Martyr
| ''Dialogue with Trypho''
| Dialogue
| Apologetic
| Ephesus or Rome
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF; Falls
| Lengthy defense of Christianity against Jewish objections.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 145–170
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Acts of John''
| ''Acts of Paul''
| Acts
| Acts
| Christian Apocrypha
| Christian Apocrypha
| Asia Minor
| Asia Minor
| Partial
| Partial
| Numerous Greek manuscripts
| Coptic, Greek, and Latin witnesses
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| Earliest of the major apocryphal Acts.
| Includes the ''Acts of Paul and Thecla.''


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 150–160
| 175–190
| Tatian
| Anonymous
| ''Address to the Greeks''
| ''Acts of Paul and Thecla''
| Apology
| Acts
| Apologetic
| Christian Apocrypha
| Rome
| Asia Minor
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Numerous Greek manuscripts
| ANF
| Schneemelcher
| Critique of Greek philosophy and culture.
| Most popular section of the ''Acts of Paul.''


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 160–172
| 175–190
| Tatian
| Anonymous
| ''Diatessaron''
| ''Third Epistle to the Corinthians''
| Gospel Harmony
| Epistle
| Gospel Harmony
| Christian Apocrypha
| Syria
| Asia Minor
| Lost (reconstructed)
| Complete
| Ephrem's Commentary; Arabic and Latin witnesses
| Armenian and Latin traditions
| Petersen; Hill
| Schneemelcher
| Earliest known harmony of the four canonical Gospels.
| Incorporated into the ''Acts of Paul.''


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 165
| 175–190
| Melito of Sardis
| Anonymous
| ''On Pascha''
| ''Martyrdom of Paul''
| Homily
| Martyr Account
| Patristic
| Christian Apocrypha
| Sardis
| Asia Minor
| Complete
| Complete
| Papyrus Chester Beatty-Michigan
| Greek manuscripts
| Hall; ANF (partial)
| Schneemelcher
| Earliest surviving Christian Paschal homily.
| Final section of the ''Acts of Paul.''


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 165–180
| 175–190
| Melito of Sardis
| Anonymous
| ''Apology''
| ''Acts of Peter''
| Apology
| Acts
| Apologetic
| Christian Apocrypha
| Sardis
| Rome
| Fragmentary
| Partial
| Eusebius
| Vercelli Acts; Greek fragments
| Hall
| Schneemelcher
| Addressed to Emperor Marcus Aurelius.
| Contains the ''Quo Vadis'' episode.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 165–180
| 220–230
| Melito of Sardis
| Anonymous
| ''Extracts'' (''Eklogai'')
| ''Acts of Andrew''
| Biblical Commentary
| Acts
| Biblical Commentary
| Christian Apocrypha
| Sardis
| Asia Minor
| Fragmentary
| Fragmentary
| Catenae and patristic citations
| Greek fragments; later recensions
| Hall
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| Collection of scriptural interpretations.
| One of the major apocryphal apostolic Acts.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 165–177
| c. 178
| Athenagoras of Athens
| Celsus
| ''Plea for the Christians''
| ''The True Doctrine''
| Apology
| Polemic
| Apologetic
| Pagan Critique
| Athens (probably)
| Alexandria (probably)
| Complete
| Lost (quoted extensively)
| Medieval manuscripts
| Preserved by Origen
| ANF
| Chadwick
| Defense of Christians addressed to Marcus Aurelius and Commodus.
| Most influential pagan critique of Christianity before Porphyry.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 177
| 180
| Athenagoras of Athens
| Irenaeus of Lyons
| ''On the Resurrection of the Dead''
| ''Against Heresies''
| Treatise
| Anti-heretical Treatise
| Patristic
| Anti-heretical
| Athens
| Proto-orthodox
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Latin manuscripts; Armenian fragments
| ANF
| ANF; Rousseau & Doutreleau
| Earliest full-length defense of bodily resurrection.
| Principal refutation of second-century Gnosticism.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 169–183
| c. 180
| Theophilus of Antioch
| Irenaeus of Lyons
| ''To Autolycus''
| ''Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching''
| Apology
| Catechetical Treatise
| Apologetic
| Patristic
| Antioch
| Lyons
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Armenian manuscript
| ANF
| Behr
| First known Christian author to use the word "Trinity" (Trias).
| Summary of Christian doctrine.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 170
| 180–190
| Anonymous
| Rhodo
| ''Muratorian Fragment''
| ''Against Marcion''
| Canon List
| Anti-heretical Treatise
| Canonical Literature
| Anti-heretical
| Rome
| Rome
| Fragmentary
| Fragmentary
| Codex Ambrosianus
| Eusebius
| Metzger
| ANF (fragments)
| Earliest surviving list of New Testament books.
| Disciple of Tatian.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 170–180
| c. 190
| Anonymous
| Clement of Alexandria
| ''Letter of the Churches of Lyons and Vienne''
| ''Exhortation to the Greeks'' (''Protrepticus'')
| Martyr Account
| Apologetic Treatise
| Martyr Literature
| Patristic
| Gaul
| Alexandria
| Complete
| Complete
| Preserved in Eusebius
| Medieval manuscripts
| Musurillo
| ANF
| Documents the persecution under Marcus Aurelius.
| Invitation for pagans to embrace Christianity.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 177
| c. 190
| Anonymous
| Clement of Alexandria
| ''Martyrdom of Pionius''
| ''The Instructor'' (''Paedagogus'')
| Martyr Account
| Moral Treatise
| Martyr Literature
| Patristic
| Smyrna
| Alexandria
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| Musurillo
| ANF
| Traditional date disputed by some scholars.
| Christian ethics and daily conduct.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 175–185
| 190–202
| Anonymous
| Clement of Alexandria
| ''Acts of Paul''
| ''Miscellanies'' (''Stromata'')
| Acts
| Theological Miscellany
| Christian Apocrypha
| Patristic
| Asia Minor
| Alexandria
| Partial
| Complete
| Coptic, Greek, and Latin witnesses
| Medieval manuscripts
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| ANF
| Includes the ''Acts of Paul and Thecla.''
| One of the most learned Christian works of the second century.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 175–190
| c. 190
| Anonymous
| Clement of Alexandria
| ''Acts of Paul and Thecla''
| ''Who Is the Rich Man That Shall Be Saved?''
| Acts
| Homily
| Christian Apocrypha
| Patristic
| Asia Minor
| Alexandria
| Complete
| Complete
| Numerous Greek manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| Schneemelcher
| ANF
| Most popular section of the ''Acts of Paul.''
| Commentary on Mark 10:17–31.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 175–190
| c. 197
| Anonymous
| Tertullian
| ''Third Epistle to the Corinthians''
| ''Apology''
| Epistle
| Apology
| Christian Apocrypha
| Apologetic
| Asia Minor
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Armenian and Latin traditions
| Medieval manuscripts
| Schneemelcher
| ANF
| Incorporated into the ''Acts of Paul.''
| Greatest Latin apology of the early Church.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 175–190
| c. 197
| Anonymous
| Tertullian
| ''Martyrdom of Paul''
| ''To the Nations''
| Martyr Account
| Apology
| Christian Apocrypha
| Apologetic
| Asia Minor
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| Schneemelcher
| ANF
| Final section of the ''Acts of Paul.''
| Earlier companion to the ''Apology.''


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 175–190
| c. 197
| Anonymous
| Tertullian
| ''Acts of Peter''
| ''On the Testimony of the Soul''
| Acts
| Treatise
| Christian Apocrypha
| Patristic
| Rome
| Carthage
| Partial
| Complete
| Vercelli Acts; Greek fragments
| Medieval manuscripts
| Schneemelcher
| ANF
| Contains the ''Quo Vadis'' episode.
| Appeals to natural knowledge of God.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 220–230
| 197–208
| Anonymous
| Tertullian
| ''Acts of Andrew''
| ''Against Marcion''
| Acts
| Anti-heretical Treatise
| Christian Apocrypha
| Anti-heretical
| Asia Minor
| Carthage
| Fragmentary
| Complete
| Greek fragments; later recensions
| Medieval manuscripts
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| ANF
| One of the major apocryphal apostolic Acts.
| Five-book refutation of Marcionism.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 178
| c. 198
| Celsus
| Tertullian
| ''The True Doctrine''
| ''On Baptism''
| Polemic
| Treatise
| Pagan Critique
| Patristic
| Alexandria (probably)
| Carthage
| Lost (quoted extensively)
| Complete
| Preserved by Origen
| Medieval manuscripts
| Chadwick
| ANF
| Most influential pagan critique of Christianity before Porphyry.
| Earliest surviving treatise devoted entirely to baptism.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 180
| c. 198
| Irenaeus of Lyons
| Tertullian
| ''Against Heresies''
| ''On Prayer''
| Anti-heretical Treatise
| Treatise
| Anti-heretical
| Patristic
| Proto-orthodox
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Latin manuscripts; Armenian fragments
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF; Rousseau & Doutreleau
| ANF
| Principal refutation of second-century Gnosticism.
| Earliest substantial Christian commentary on the Lord's Prayer.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 180
| c. 199
| Irenaeus of Lyons
| Tertullian
| ''Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching''
| ''On Repentance''
| Catechetical Treatise
| Treatise
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Lyons
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Armenian manuscript
| Medieval manuscripts
| Behr
| ANF
| Summary of Christian doctrine.
| Important witness to early penitential practice.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 180–190
| c. 200
| Rhodo
| Anonymous
| ''Against Marcion''
| ''Acts of Thomas''
| Anti-heretical Treatise
| Acts
| Anti-heretical
| Christian Apocrypha
| Rome
| Edessa
| Fragmentary
| Complete
| Eusebius
| Syriac and Greek manuscripts
| ANF (fragments)
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| Disciple of Tatian.
| Famous for the "Hymn of the Pearl."


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 190
| c. 200
| Clement of Alexandria
| Anonymous
| ''Exhortation to the Greeks'' (''Protrepticus'')
| ''Hymn of the Pearl''
| Apologetic Treatise
| Hymn
| Patristic
| Christian Poetry
| Alexandria
| Edessa
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Embedded in the ''Acts of Thomas''
| ANF
| Schneemelcher
| Invitation for pagans to embrace Christianity.
| One of the masterpieces of early Syriac Christian literature.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 190
| c. 200
| Clement of Alexandria
| Anonymous
| ''The Instructor'' (''Paedagogus'')
| ''Gospel of Judas''
| Moral Treatise
| Dialogue Gospel
| Patristic
| Gnostic Literature
| Alexandria
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Codex Tchacos
| ANF
| Meyer; Kasser
| Christian ethics and daily conduct.
| Presents Judas as the recipient of secret revelation.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 190–202
| c. 200
| Clement of Alexandria
| Anonymous
| ''Miscellanies'' (''Stromata'')
| ''Apocryphon of John''
| Theological Miscellany
| Revelation Dialogue
| Patristic
| Gnostic Literature
| Alexandria
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Nag Hammadi Codices II, III, IV; Berlin Codex
| ANF
| Robinson; Meyer
| One of the most learned Christian works of the second century.
| Foundational  Gnostic text.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 190
| c. 200
| Clement of Alexandria
| Anonymous
| ''Who Is the Rich Man That Shall Be Saved?''
| ''Hypostasis of the Archons''
| Homily
| Treatise
| Patristic
| Gnostic Literature
| Alexandria
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Nag Hammadi Codex II
| ANF
| Robinson
| Commentary on Mark 10:17–31.
| Interpretation of Genesis from a  perspective.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 197
| c. 200
| Tertullian
| Anonymous
| ''Apology''
| ''The Thought of Norea''
| Apology
| Revelation
| Apologetic
| Gnostic Literature
| Carthage
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Nag Hammadi Codex IX
| ANF
| Robinson
| Greatest Latin apology of the early Church.
| Short revelation centered on Norea.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 197
| c. 200
| Tertullian
| Anonymous
| ''To the Nations''
| ''Thunder, Perfect Mind''
| Apology
| Poetic Revelation
| Apologetic
| Gnostic Literature
| Carthage
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Nag Hammadi Codex VI
| ANF
| Robinson
| Earlier companion to the ''Apology.''
| Famous poetic monologue spoken by a divine female figure.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 197
| c. 200
| Tertullian
| Anonymous
| ''On the Testimony of the Soul''
| ''Trimorphic Protennoia''
| Treatise
| Revelation
| Patristic
| Gnostic Literature
| Carthage
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Nag Hammadi Codex XIII
| ANF
| Robinson
| Appeals to natural knowledge of God.
| Closely related to the ''Apocryphon of John.''


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 197–208
| c. 200
| Tertullian
| Anonymous
| ''Against Marcion''
| ''Sophia of Jesus Christ''
| Anti-heretical Treatise
| Dialogue
| Anti-heretical
| Gnostic Literature
| Carthage
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Nag Hammadi Codex III; Berlin Codex
| ANF
| Robinson
| Five-book refutation of Marcionism.
| Dialogue between the risen Christ and his disciples.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 198
| c. 200
| Tertullian
| Anonymous
| ''On Baptism''
| ''Tripartite Tractate''
| Treatise
| Theological Treatise
| Patristic
| Gnostic Literature
| Carthage
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Nag Hammadi Codex I
| ANF
| Robinson
| Earliest surviving treatise devoted entirely to baptism.
| One of the longest Valentinian theological works.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 198
| c. 200
| Tertullian
| Anonymous
| ''On Prayer''
| ''Interpretation of Knowledge''
| Treatise
| Treatise
| Patristic
| Gnostic Literature
| Carthage
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Nag Hammadi Codex XI
| ANF
| Robinson
| Earliest substantial Christian commentary on the Lord's Prayer.
| Reflects mature Valentinian ecclesiology.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 199
| Tertullian
| ''On Repentance''
| Treatise
| Patristic
| Carthage
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF
| Important witness to early penitential practice.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 200
| c. 200
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Acts of Thomas''
| ''Letter of Peter to Philip''
| Acts
| Epistle
| Christian Apocrypha
| Gnostic Literature
| Edessa
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Syriac and Greek manuscripts
| Nag Hammadi Codex VIII
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| Robinson
| Famous for the "Hymn of the Pearl."
| Expanded apostolic revelation dialogue.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 200
| c. 200
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Hymn of the Pearl''
| ''Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles''
| Hymn
| Acts
| Christian Poetry
| Gnostic Literature
| Edessa
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Embedded in the ''Acts of Thomas''
| Nag Hammadi Codex VI
| Schneemelcher
| Robinson
| One of the masterpieces of early Syriac Christian literature.
| Symbolic missionary narrative.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 200
| 200–203
| Anonymous
| Clement of Alexandria
| ''Gospel of Judas''
| ''Excerpts from Theodotus''
| Dialogue Gospel
| Commentary
| Gnostic Literature
| Patristic
| Egypt
| Alexandria
| Complete
| Complete
| Codex Tchacos
| Medieval manuscripts
| Meyer; Kasser
| ANF
| Presents Judas as the recipient of secret revelation.
| Commentary preserving Valentinian traditions.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 200
| 200–203
| Anonymous
| Clement of Alexandria
| ''Apocryphon of John''
| ''Eclogae Propheticae''
| Revelation Dialogue
| Commentary
| Gnostic Literature
| Patristic
| Egypt
| Alexandria
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codices II, III, IV; Berlin Codex
| Medieval manuscripts
| Robinson; Meyer
| ANF
| Foundational  Gnostic text.
| Notes on biblical interpretation.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 200
| 200–203
| Anonymous
| Clement of Alexandria
| ''Hypostasis of the Archons''
| ''Quis Dives Salvetur?''
| Treatise
| Homily
| Gnostic Literature
| Patristic
| Egypt
| Alexandria
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex II
| Medieval manuscripts
| Robinson
| ANF
| Interpretation of Genesis from a  perspective.
| Interpretation of the Rich Young Ruler.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 200
| c. 200
| Anonymous
| Minucius Felix
| ''The Thought of Norea''
| ''Octavius''
| Revelation
| Dialogue
| Gnostic Literature
| Apologetic
| Egypt
| Rome
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex IX
| Medieval manuscripts
| Robinson
| ANF
| Short revelation centered on Norea.
| Earliest surviving Christian dialogue in Latin.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 200
| 200–206
| Anonymous
| Tertullian
| ''Thunder, Perfect Mind''
| ''On the Prescription of Heretics''
| Poetic Revelation
| Anti-heretical Treatise
| Gnostic Literature
| Anti-heretical
| Egypt
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex VI
| Medieval manuscripts
| Robinson
| ANF
| Famous poetic monologue spoken by a divine female figure.
| Argues apostolic succession determines authentic doctrine.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 200
| c. 202
| Anonymous
| Tertullian
| ''Trimorphic Protennoia''
| ''Against Praxeas''
| Revelation
| Anti-heretical Treatise
| Gnostic Literature
| Anti-heretical
| Egypt
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex XIII
| Medieval manuscripts
| Robinson
| ANF
| Closely related to the ''Apocryphon of John.''
| Earliest extensive Latin defense of Trinitarian theology.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 200
| c. 203
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Sophia of Jesus Christ''
| ''Passion of Perpetua and Felicitas''
| Dialogue
| Martyr Account
| Gnostic Literature
| Martyr Literature
| Egypt
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex III; Berlin Codex
| Numerous Latin manuscripts
| Robinson
| Musurillo
| Dialogue between the risen Christ and his disciples.
| Includes Perpetua's own prison diary.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 200
| c. 203
| Anonymous
| Tertullian
| ''Tripartite Tractate''
| ''To the Martyrs''
| Theological Treatise
| Treatise
| Gnostic Literature
| Patristic
| Egypt
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex I
| Medieval manuscripts
| Robinson
| ANF
| One of the longest Valentinian theological works.
| Encouragement for imprisoned confessors.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 200
| c. 203
| Anonymous
| Tertullian
| ''Interpretation of Knowledge''
| ''On the Crown''
| Treatise
| Treatise
| Gnostic Literature
| Patristic
| Egypt
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex XI
| Medieval manuscripts
| Robinson
| ANF
| Reflects mature Valentinian ecclesiology.
| Discusses military service and Christian conscience.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 200
| c. 205
| Anonymous
| Hippolytus of Rome
| ''Letter of Peter to Philip''
| ''Commentary on Daniel''
| Epistle
| Biblical Commentary
| Gnostic Literature
| Biblical Commentary
| Egypt
| Rome
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex VIII
| Greek and Slavonic witnesses
| Robinson
| ANF
| Expanded apostolic revelation dialogue.
| Earliest surviving complete Christian biblical commentary.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 200
| c. 205
| Anonymous
| Hippolytus of Rome
| ''Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles''
| ''On Christ and Antichrist''
| Acts
| Treatise
| Gnostic Literature
| Egypt
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex VI
| Robinson
| Symbolic missionary narrative.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 200–203
| Clement of Alexandria
| ''Excerpts from Theodotus''
| Commentary
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Alexandria
| Rome
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Greek  manuscripts
| ANF
| ANF
| Commentary preserving Valentinian traditions.
| Major early work of Christian eschatology.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 200–203
| 205–215
| Clement of Alexandria
| Hippolytus of Rome
| ''Eclogae Propheticae''
| ''Apostolic Tradition''
| Commentary
| Church Order
| Patristic
| Church Order
| Alexandria
| Rome
| Reconstructed
| Ethiopic, Latin, Arabic, Sahidic witnesses
| Stewart; Bradshaw
| Influential source for early liturgy and ordination rites.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 210–220
| Hippolytus of Rome
| ''Refutation of All Heresies''
| Anti-heretical Treatise
| Anti-heretical
| Rome
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Mount Athos manuscript
| ANF
| ANF
| Notes on biblical interpretation.
| Valuable source for many otherwise-lost heresies.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 200–203
| c. 212
| Clement of Alexandria
| Tertullian
| ''Quis Dives Salvetur?''
| ''On the Resurrection of the Flesh''
| Homily
| Treatise
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Alexandria
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF
| ANF
| Interpretation of the Rich Young Ruler.
| Defense of bodily resurrection.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 200
| c. 213
| Minucius Felix
| Tertullian
| ''Octavius''
| ''On the Soul''
| Dialogue
| Treatise
| Apologetic
| Patristic
| Rome
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF
| ANF
| Earliest surviving Christian dialogue in Latin.
| Early Christian anthropology.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 200–206
| c. 215
| Tertullian
| Origen
| ''On the Prescription of Heretics''
| ''Exhortation to Martyrdom''
| Anti-heretical Treatise
| Treatise
| Anti-heretical
| Patristic
| Carthage
| Caesarea
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF
| ANF; Greer
| Argues apostolic succession determines authentic doctrine.
| Written during persecution.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 202
| c. 215
| Tertullian
| Origen
| ''Against Praxeas''
| ''On Prayer''
| Anti-heretical Treatise
| Treatise
| Anti-heretical
| Patristic
| Carthage
| Caesarea
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF
| Greer
| Earliest extensive Latin defense of Trinitarian theology.
| One of the finest early Christian works on prayer.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 203
| c. 220
| Anonymous
| Origen
| ''Passion of Perpetua and Felicitas''
| ''On First Principles'' (''De Principiis'')
| Martyr Account
| Systematic Theology
| Martyr Literature
| Patristic
| Carthage
| Alexandria
| Complete
| Partial
| Numerous Latin manuscripts
| Latin translation of Rufinus
| Musurillo
| Butterworth
| Includes Perpetua's own prison diary.
| First systematic theology in Christian history.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 203
| 220–230
| Tertullian
| Origen of Alexandria
| ''To the Martyrs''
| ''Commentary on John''
| Treatise
| Biblical Commentary
| Patristic
| Biblical Commentary
| Carthage
| Alexandria
| Complete
| Fragmentary
| Medieval manuscripts
| Greek fragments; Latin translation by Rufinus
| ANF
| ANF; Heine
| Encouragement for imprisoned confessors.
| One of the earliest extensive Christian commentaries on the Fourth Gospel.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 203
| 220–230
| Tertullian
| Origen of Alexandria
| ''On the Crown''
| ''Commentary on Matthew''
| Treatise
| Patristic
| Carthage
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF
| Discusses military service and Christian conscience.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 205
| Hippolytus of Rome
| ''Commentary on Daniel''
| Biblical Commentary
| Biblical Commentary
| Biblical Commentary
| Biblical Commentary
| Rome
| Alexandria
| Complete
| Fragmentary
| Greek and Slavonic witnesses
| Greek fragments
| ANF
| ANF; Scheck
| Earliest surviving complete Christian biblical commentary.
| Important witness to early Gospel interpretation.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 205
| 220–230
| Hippolytus of Rome
| Origen of Alexandria
| ''On Christ and Antichrist''
| ''Commentary on Romans''
| Treatise
| Biblical Commentary
| Patristic
| Biblical Commentary
| Rome
| Alexandria
| Complete
| Partial
| Greek  manuscripts
| Rufinus translation
| ANF
| ANF
| Major early work of Christian eschatology.
| Earliest surviving major commentary on Romans.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 205–215
| 220–230
| Hippolytus of Rome
| Origen of Alexandria
| ''Apostolic Tradition''
| ''Commentary on Genesis''
| Church Order
| Biblical Commentary
| Church Order
| Biblical Commentary
| Rome
| Alexandria
| Reconstructed
| Fragmentary
| Ethiopic, Latin, Arabic, Sahidic witnesses
| Patristic quotations
| Stewart; Bradshaw
| Heine
| Influential source for early liturgy and ordination rites.
| Demonstrates Origen's allegorical interpretation.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 210–220
| 220–230
| Hippolytus of Rome
| Origen of Alexandria
| ''Refutation of All Heresies''
| ''Homilies on Genesis''
| Anti-heretical Treatise
| Homily
| Anti-heretical
| Patristic
| Rome
| Alexandria
| Complete
| Partial
| Mount Athos manuscript
| Rufinus translation
| ANF
| ANF
| Valuable source for many otherwise-lost heresies.
| Early example of Christian preaching on Scripture.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 212
| 220–230
| Tertullian
| Origen of Alexandria
| ''On the Resurrection of the Flesh''
| ''Homilies on Exodus''
| Treatise
| Homily
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Carthage
| Alexandria
| Complete
| Partial
| Medieval manuscripts
| Rufinus translation
| ANF
| ANF
| Defense of bodily resurrection.
| Develops typological readings of Exodus.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 213
| 220–230
| Tertullian
| Origen of Alexandria
| ''On the Soul''
| ''Homilies on Leviticus''
| Treatise
| Homily
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Carthage
| Alexandria
| Complete
| Partial
| Medieval manuscripts
| Rufinus translation
| ANF
| ANF
| Early Christian anthropology.
| Influential on later sacramental theology.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 215
| 220–230
| Origen
| Origen of Alexandria
| ''Exhortation to Martyrdom''
| ''Hexapla''
| Treatise
| Biblical Textual Criticism
| Patristic
| Biblical Scholarship
| Caesarea  
| Caesarea
| Complete
| Fragmentary
| Medieval manuscripts
| Fragments preserved in later writers
| ANF; Greer
| Field; Nautin
| Written during persecution.
| Monumental six-column edition of the Old Testament.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 215
| c. 220
| Origen
| Julius Africanus
| ''On Prayer''
| ''Chronographiai''
| Treatise
| Chronology / History
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Caesarea
| Palestine
| Complete
| Fragmentary
| Medieval manuscripts
| Preserved in Eusebius and later writers
| Greer
| Wallraff
| One of the finest early Christian works on prayer.
| One of the earliest Christian chronological histories.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 220
| c. 220
| Origen
| Julius Africanus
| ''On First Principles'' (''De Principiis'')
| ''Letter to Aristides''
| Systematic Theology
| Letter / Gospel Harmonization
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Alexandria
| Palestine
| Partial
| Fragmentary
| Latin translation of Rufinus
| Preserved in Eusebius
| Butterworth
| ANF
| First systematic theology in Christian history.
| Discusses apparent differences between Matthew and Luke.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 220–230
| 220–230
| Origen of Alexandria
| Anonymous
| ''Commentary on John''
| ''Acts of Andrew''
| Biblical Commentary
| Acts
| Biblical Commentary
| Christian Apocrypha
| Alexandria
| Asia Minor
| Fragmentary
| Fragmentary
| Greek fragments; Latin translation by Rufinus
| Greek fragments; later recensions
| ANF; Heine
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| One of the earliest extensive Christian commentaries on the Fourth Gospel.
| One of the major apocryphal apostolic Acts.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 220–230
| 220–240
| Origen of Alexandria
| Anonymous
| ''Commentary on Matthew''
| ''Acts of Peter and Andrew''
| Biblical Commentary
| Acts
| Biblical Commentary
| Christian Apocrypha
| Alexandria
| Egypt or Asia Minor
| Fragmentary
| Fragmentary
| Greek fragments
| Greek manuscripts
| ANF; Scheck
| Schneemelcher
| Important witness to early Gospel interpretation.
| Part of the broader Acts tradition.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 220–230
| c. 230
| Origen of Alexandria
| Anonymous
| ''Commentary on Romans''
| ''Gospel of Bartholomew''
| Biblical Commentary
| Gospel / Revelation Dialogue
| Biblical Commentary
| Christian Apocrypha
| Alexandria
| Egypt
| Partial
| Fragmentary
| Rufinus translation
| Greek and Coptic manuscripts
| ANF
| Elliott
| Earliest surviving major commentary on Romans.
| Contains dialogues between Christ and Bartholomew.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 220–230
| c. 230
| Origen of Alexandria
| Anonymous
| ''Commentary on Genesis''
| ''Questions of Bartholomew''
| Biblical Commentary
| Revelation Dialogue
| Biblical Commentary
| Christian Apocrypha
| Alexandria
| Egypt
| Fragmentary
| Fragmentary
| Patristic quotations
| Greek and Coptic manuscripts
| Heine
| Elliott
| Demonstrates Origen's allegorical interpretation.
| Explores post-resurrection revelations.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 220–230
| c. 230
| Origen of Alexandria
| Anonymous
| ''Homilies on Genesis''
| ''Apocalypse of Adam''
| Homily
| Apocalypse
| Patristic
| Gnostic Literature
| Alexandria
| Egypt
| Partial
| Complete
| Rufinus translation
| Nag Hammadi Codex V
| ANF
| Robinson
| Early example of Christian preaching on Scripture.
| reinterpretation of salvation history.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 220–230
| c. 230
| Origen of Alexandria
| Anonymous
| ''Homilies on Exodus''
| ''Zostrianos''
| Homily
| Revelation
| Patristic
| Gnostic Literature
| Alexandria
| Egypt
| Partial
| Complete
| Rufinus translation
| Nag Hammadi Codex VIII
| ANF
| Robinson
| Develops typological readings of Exodus.
| Long  cosmological revelation.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 220–230
| c. 230
| Origen of Alexandria
| Anonymous
| ''Homilies on Leviticus''
| ''Allogenes''
| Homily
| Revelation Dialogue
| Patristic
| Gnostic Literature
| Alexandria
| Egypt
| Partial
| Complete
| Rufinus translation
| Nag Hammadi Codex XI
| ANF
| Robinson
| Influential on later sacramental theology.
| Describes ascent through heavenly realms.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 220–230
| c. 230
| Origen of Alexandria
| Anonymous
| ''Hexapla''
| ''Marsanes''
| Biblical Textual Criticism
| Revelation Treatise
| Biblical Scholarship
| Gnostic Literature
| Caesarea
| Egypt
| Fragmentary
| Complete
| Fragments preserved in later writers
| Nag Hammadi Codex X
| Field; Nautin
| Robinson
| Monumental six-column edition of the Old Testament.
| Mystical cosmological work.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 220
| 235–240
| Julius Africanus
| Novatian of Rome
| ''Chronographiai''
| ''On the Trinity''
| Chronology / History
| Theological Treatise
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Palestine
| Rome
| Fragmentary
| Complete
| Preserved in Eusebius and later writers
| Medieval manuscripts
| Wallraff
| ANF
| One of the earliest Christian chronological histories.
| Earliest surviving Latin treatise devoted to the Trinity.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 220
| 235–250
| Julius Africanus
| Novatian of Rome
| ''Letter to Aristides''
| ''On Jewish Foods''
| Letter / Gospel Harmonization
| Treatise
| Patristic
| Biblical Interpretation
| Palestine
| Rome
| Fragmentary
| Complete
| Preserved in Eusebius
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF
| ANF
| Discusses apparent differences between Matthew and Luke.
| Allegorical interpretation of Jewish dietary laws.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 220–230
| 235–250
| Anonymous
| Novatian of Rome
| ''Acts of Andrew''
| ''Letters''
| Acts
| Letters
| Christian Apocrypha
| Patristic
| Asia Minor
| Rome
| Fragmentary
| Fragmentary
| Greek fragments; later recensions
| Cyprian and later writers
| Schneemelcher; Elliott
| ANF
| One of the major apocryphal apostolic Acts.
| Important evidence for Roman church disputes.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 220–240
| 240–250
| Anonymous
| Cyprian of Carthage
| ''Acts of Peter and Andrew''
| ''To Donatus''
| Acts
| Treatise
| Christian Apocrypha
| Patristic
| Egypt or Asia Minor
| Carthage
| Fragmentary
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| Schneemelcher
| ANF
| Part of the broader Acts tradition.
| Cyprian's conversion narrative.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 230
| 246
| Anonymous
| Cyprian of Carthage
| ''Gospel of Bartholomew''
| ''The Dress of Virgins''
| Gospel / Revelation Dialogue
| Treatise
| Christian Apocrypha
| Patristic
| Egypt
| Carthage
| Fragmentary
| Complete
| Greek and Coptic manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| Elliott
| ANF
| Contains dialogues between Christ and Bartholomew.
| Discusses Christian ascetic ideals.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 230
| 248
| Anonymous
| Cyprian of Carthage
| ''Questions of Bartholomew''
| ''The Unity of the Church''
| Revelation Dialogue
| Ecclesiology Treatise
| Christian Apocrypha
| Patristic
| Egypt
| Carthage
| Fragmentary
| Complete
| Greek and Coptic manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| Elliott
| ANF
| Explores post-resurrection revelations.
| Major early statement on episcopal unity.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 230
| 249
| Anonymous
| Cyprian of Carthage
| ''Apocalypse of Adam''
| ''On the Lapsed''
| Apocalypse
| Pastoral Treatise
| Gnostic Literature
| Patristic
| Egypt
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex V
| Medieval manuscripts
| Robinson
| ANF
| reinterpretation of salvation history.
| Addresses Christians who sacrificed during persecution.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 230
| 249
| Anonymous
| Cyprian of Carthage
| ''Zostrianos''
| ''On the Lord's Prayer''
| Revelation
| Treatise
| Gnostic Literature
| Patristic
| Egypt
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex VIII
| Medieval manuscripts
| Robinson
| ANF
| Long  cosmological revelation.
| Early Latin commentary on the Lord's Prayer.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 230
| c. 250
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Allogenes''
| ''Didascalia Apostolorum''
| Revelation Dialogue
| Church Order
| Gnostic Literature
| Church Order
| Egypt
| Syria
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex XI
| Syriac manuscripts
| Robinson
| Connolly; Funk
| Describes ascent through heavenly realms.
| Important source for third-century church practice.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 230
| c. 250
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Marsanes''
| ''Acts of the Scillitan Martyrs''
| Revelation Treatise
| Martyr Account
| Gnostic Literature
| Martyr Literature
| Egypt
| North Africa
| Complete
| Complete
| Nag Hammadi Codex X
| Greek manuscripts
| Robinson
| Musurillo
| Mystical cosmological work.
| Earliest surviving Latin martyr act.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 235–240
| c. 250
| Novatian of Rome
| Anonymous
| ''On the Trinity''
| ''Martyrdom of Pionius''
| Theological Treatise
| Martyr Account
| Patristic
| Martyr Literature
| Rome
| Smyrna
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Greek manuscripts
| ANF
| Musurillo
| Earliest surviving Latin treatise devoted to the Trinity.
| Describes persecution under Decius or earlier.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 235–250
| c. 250
| Novatian of Rome
| Anonymous
| ''On Jewish Foods''
| ''Testament of Jesus Christ''
| Treatise
| Church Order / Revelation
| Biblical Interpretation
| Christian Pseudepigrapha
| Rome
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Greek manuscripts
| ANF
| Tübingen editions
| Allegorical interpretation of Jewish dietary laws.
| Presents apostolic instructions attributed to Jesus.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 235–250
| c. 250
| Novatian of Rome
| Anonymous
| ''Letters''
| ''Acts of Xanthippe and Polyxena''
| Letters
| Acts
| Patristic
| Christian Apocrypha
| Rome
| Spain (traditional)
| Fragmentary
| Complete
| Cyprian and later writers
| Greek  manuscripts
| ANF
| Elliott
| Important evidence for Roman church disputes.
| Late apocryphal Acts tradition.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 240–250
| c. 250
| Cyprian of Carthage
| Anonymous
| ''To Donatus''
| ''Acts of Philip''
| Treatise
| Acts
| Christian Apocrypha
| Asia Minor
| Fragmentary
| Greek manuscripts
| Schneemelcher
| Contains extensive miracle narratives.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 250–251
| Cyprian of Carthage
| ''Letters''
| Letters
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Carthage
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF
| ANF; Diercks
| Cyprian's conversion narrative.
| One of the most important collections of third-century Christian correspondence.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 246
| 250–251
| Cyprian of Carthage
| Cyprian of Carthage
| ''The Dress of Virgins''
| ''To Demetrian''
| Treatise
| Apologetic Treatise
| Patristic
| Apologetic
| Carthage
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF
| ANF
| Discusses Christian ascetic ideals.
| Responds to pagan accusations that Christians caused disasters.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 248
| 251
| Cyprian of Carthage
| Cyprian of Carthage
| ''The Unity of the Church''
| ''On the Mortality''
| Ecclesiology Treatise
| Pastoral Treatise
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Carthage
| Carthage
Line 2,040: Line 2,319:
| Medieval manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF
| ANF
| Major early statement on episcopal unity.
| Reflection on Christian responses to plague and death.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 249
| 251
| Cyprian of Carthage
| Cyprian of Carthage
| ''On the Lapsed''
| ''On Works and Almsgiving''
| Pastoral Treatise
| Moral Treatise
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Carthage
| Carthage
Line 2,052: Line 2,331:
| Medieval manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF
| ANF
| Addresses Christians who sacrificed during persecution.
| Discusses charity and repentance.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 249
| 251–258
| Cyprian of Carthage
| Cyprian of Carthage
| ''On the Lord's Prayer''
| ''Letters concerning the Novatian Schism''
| Treatise
| Ecclesiastical Letters
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Carthage
| Carthage
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF; Diercks
| Major evidence for early debates over church unity and restoration of the lapsed.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 251
| Novatian
| ''On the Jewish Foods''
| Biblical Treatise
| Patristic
| Rome
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF
| ANF
| Early Latin commentary on the Lord's Prayer.
| Allegorical interpretation of Mosaic food laws.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 250
| c. 251
| Anonymous
| Novatian
| ''Didascalia Apostolorum''
| ''On the Trinity''
| Church Order
| Theological Treatise
| Church Order
| Patristic
| Syria
| Rome
| Complete
| Complete
| Syriac manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| Connolly; Funk
| ANF
| Important source for third-century church practice.
| One of the earliest Latin works defending Trinitarian theology.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 250
| c. 251
| Anonymous
| Novatian
| ''Acts of the Scillitan Martyrs''
| ''On the Spectacles''
| Martyr Account
| Moral Treatise
| Martyr Literature
| Patristic
| North Africa
| Rome
| Complete
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| Musurillo
| ANF
| Earliest surviving Latin martyr act.
| Argues Christians should avoid pagan entertainment.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 250
| 251–260
| Dionysius of Alexandria
| ''Letters''
| Letters
| Patristic
| Alexandria
| Fragmentary
| Eusebius and later writers
| ANF
| Important witness to third-century theological controversies.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 252
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Martyrdom of Pionius''
| ''Acts of Cyprian''
| Martyr Account
| Martyr Account
| Martyr Literature
| Martyr Literature
| Smyrna
| Carthage
| Complete
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Latin manuscripts
| Musurillo
| Musurillo
| Describes persecution under Decius or earlier.
| Earliest surviving account of an African bishop's martyrdom.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 250
| Anonymous
| ''Testament of Jesus Christ''
| Church Order / Revelation
| Christian Pseudepigrapha
| Egypt
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Tübingen editions
| Presents apostolic instructions attributed to Jesus.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 250
| 252–260
| Dionysius of Alexandria
| ''Against Nepos''
| Anti-millennialist Treatise
| Anti-heretical
| Alexandria
| Fragmentary
| Eusebius
| ANF fragments
| Refutes excessive literal millennial interpretations.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 255
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Acts of Xanthippe and Polyxena''
| ''Acts of Marianus and James''
| Acts
| Martyr Account
| Christian Apocrypha
| Martyr Literature
| Spain (traditional)
| North Africa
| Complete
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Greek manuscripts
| Elliott
| Musurillo
| Late apocryphal Acts tradition.
| Important witness to persecution under Valerian.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 250
| c. 255
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Acts of Philip''
| ''Passion of Montanus, Lucius, and Others''
| Acts
| Martyr Account
| Christian Apocrypha
| Martyr Literature
| Asia Minor
| North Africa
| Fragmentary
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Greek manuscripts
| Schneemelcher
| Musurillo
| Contains extensive miracle narratives.
| Describes Montanist-associated martyrs.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 250–251
| c. 255
| Cyprian of Carthage
| Anonymous
| ''Letters''
| ''Acts of Euplus''
| Letters
| Martyr Account
| Patristic
| Martyr Literature
| Carthage
| Sicily
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Greek manuscripts
| ANF; Diercks
| Musurillo
| One of the most important collections of third-century Christian correspondence.
| Valerian persecution martyrdom account.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 250–251
| 260–270
| Cyprian of Carthage
| Gregory Thaumaturgus
| ''To Demetrian''
| ''Address of Thanks to Origen''
| Apologetic Treatise
| Oration
| Apologetic
| Carthage
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF
| Responds to pagan accusations that Christians caused disasters.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 251
| Cyprian of Carthage
| ''On the Mortality''
| Pastoral Treatise
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Carthage
| Palestine
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Greek manuscripts
| ANF
| ANF
| Reflection on Christian responses to plague and death.
| Important account of Origen's teaching.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 251
| c. 260
| Cyprian of Carthage
| Gregory Thaumaturgus
| ''On Works and Almsgiving''
| ''Canonical Letter''
| Moral Treatise
| Ecclesiastical Letter
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Carthage
| Neocaesarea
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Greek manuscripts
| ANF
| ANF
| Discusses charity and repentance.
| Early evidence of church disciplinary practice.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 251–258
| 260–280
| Cyprian of Carthage
| Anonymous
| ''Letters concerning the Novatian Schism''
| ''Acts of Peter and Paul''
| Ecclesiastical Letters
| Acts
| Patristic
| Christian Apocrypha
| Carthage
| Asia Minor or Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Greek manuscripts
| ANF; Diercks
| Elliott
| Major evidence for early debates over church unity and restoration of the lapsed.
| Combines traditions concerning Peter and Paul.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 251
| c. 270
| Novatian
| Victorinus of Pettau
| ''On the Jewish Foods''
| ''Commentary on Revelation''
| Biblical Treatise
| Biblical Commentary
| Patristic
| Biblical Commentary
| Rome
| Pannonia
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Medieval manuscripts
| ANF
| ANF
| Allegorical interpretation of Mosaic food laws.
| Earliest surviving Latin commentary on Revelation.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 251
| c. 270
| Novatian
| Victorinus of Pettau
| ''On the Trinity''
| ''Commentary on Genesis''
| Theological Treatise
| Biblical Commentary
| Patristic
| Biblical Commentary
| Rome
| Pannonia
| Complete
| Fragmentary
| Medieval manuscripts
| Patristic quotations
| ANF
| ANF
| One of the earliest Latin works defending Trinitarian theology.
| Early Latin biblical interpretation.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 251
| c. 270
| Novatian
| Victorinus of Pettau
| ''On the Spectacles''
| ''Against the Heresies''
| Moral Treatise
| Anti-heretical Treatise
| Patristic
| Anti-heretical
| Rome
| Pannonia
| Complete
| Lost
| Medieval manuscripts
| Fragments only
| ANF
| ANF
| Argues Christians should avoid pagan entertainment.
| One of the earliest Latin anti-heretical works.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 251–260
| c. 270–280
| Dionysius of Alexandria
| Methodius of Olympus
| ''Letters''
| ''Symposium''
| Letters
| Dialogue
| Patristic
| Lycia
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| ANF
| Christian adaptation of Plato's ''Symposium'' focusing on virginity.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 270–280
| Methodius of Olympus
| ''On Free Will''
| Theological Treatise
| Patristic
| Patristic
| Alexandria
| Lycia
| Fragmentary
| Fragmentary
| Eusebius and later writers
| Patristic quotations
| ANF
| ANF
| Important witness to third-century theological controversies.
| Response to determinism.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 252
| c. 270–280
| Anonymous
| Methodius of Olympus
| ''Acts of Cyprian''
| ''On the Resurrection''
| Martyr Account
| Theological Treatise
| Martyr Literature
| Patristic
| Carthage
| Lycia
| Complete
| Latin manuscripts
| Musurillo
| Earliest surviving account of an African bishop's martyrdom.
 
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 252–260
| Dionysius of Alexandria
| ''Against Nepos''
| Anti-millennialist Treatise
| Anti-heretical
| Alexandria
| Fragmentary
| Fragmentary
| Eusebius
| Patristic quotations
| ANF fragments
| ANF
| Refutes excessive literal millennial interpretations.
| Defense of bodily resurrection.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 255
| c. 280
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Acts of Marianus and James''
| ''Apostolic Church Order''
| Martyr Account
| Church Order
| Martyr Literature
| Church Order
| North Africa
| Egypt or Syria
| Complete
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Greek manuscripts
| Musurillo
| Funk
| Important witness to persecution under Valerian.
| Early compilation of apostolic regulations.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 255
| c. 280
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Passion of Montanus, Lucius, and Others''
| ''Pseudo-Clementine Homilies''
| Martyr Account
| Religious Romance / Dialogue
| Martyr Literature
| Christian Pseudepigrapha
| North Africa
| Syria
| Complete
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Greek manuscripts
| Musurillo
| Rehm; Jones
| Describes Montanist-associated martyrs.
| Presents Peter as defender of true Christianity against Simon Magus.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 255
| c. 280
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Acts of Euplus''
| ''Pseudo-Clementine Recognitions''
| Martyr Account
| Religious Romance / Dialogue
| Martyr Literature
| Christian Pseudepigrapha
| Sicily
| Syria
| Complete
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Rufinus Latin translation
| Musurillo
| Rehm; Jones
| Valerian persecution martyrdom account.
| Related to the ''Homilies'' but preserves different traditions.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 260–270
| c. 280–300
| Gregory Thaumaturgus
| ''Address of Thanks to Origen''
| Oration
| Patristic
| Palestine
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| ANF
| Important account of Origen's teaching.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 260
| Gregory Thaumaturgus
| ''Canonical Letter''
| Ecclesiastical Letter
| Patristic
| Neocaesarea
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| ANF
| Early evidence of church disciplinary practice.
 
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| 260–280
| Anonymous
| Anonymous
| ''Acts of Peter and Paul''
| ''Apocalypse of Paul''
| Acts
| Apocalypse
| Christian Apocrypha
| Christian Apocrypha
| Asia Minor or Egypt
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Numerous medieval manuscripts
| Elliott
| Elliott
| Combines traditions concerning Peter and Paul.
| Influential vision of heaven and hell.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 270
| c. 280–300
| Victorinus of Pettau
| Anonymous
| ''Commentary on Revelation''
| ''Apocalypse of Thomas''
| Biblical Commentary
| Apocalypse
| Biblical Commentary
| Christian Apocrypha
| Pannonia
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Medieval manuscripts
| Latin manuscripts
| ANF
| Elliott
| Earliest surviving Latin commentary on Revelation.
| Eschatological revelations attributed to Thomas.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 290
| Anonymous
| ''Acts of Philip'' (later sections)
| Acts
| Christian Apocrypha
| Asia Minor
| Fragmentary
| Greek manuscripts
| Schneemelcher
| Includes extensive miracle traditions.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 270
| c. 290
| Victorinus of Pettau
| Anonymous
| ''Commentary on Genesis''
| ''Acts of Andrew and Matthias''
| Biblical Commentary
| Acts
| Biblical Commentary
| Christian Apocrypha
| Pannonia
| Egypt
| Fragmentary
| Fragmentary
| Patristic quotations
| Greek manuscripts
| ANF
| Elliott
| Early Latin biblical interpretation.
| Late apostolic Acts tradition.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 270
| 290–300
| Victorinus of Pettau
| Anonymous
| ''Against the Heresies''
| ''Life of Adam and Eve'' (Christian expansion)
| Anti-heretical Treatise
| Adamic Literature
| Anti-heretical
| Christian Pseudepigrapha
| Pannonia
| Mediterranean
| Lost
| Complete
| Fragments only
| Numerous manuscripts
| ANF
| Johnson
| One of the earliest Latin anti-heretical works.
| Christian adaptation of Jewish Adam traditions.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 270–280
| c. 300
| Methodius of Olympus
| Anonymous
| ''Symposium''
| ''Acts of the Apostles Peter and Paul'' (expanded form)
| Dialogue
| Acts
| Patristic
| Christian Apocrypha
| Lycia
| Egypt
| Complete
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Greek manuscripts
| ANF
| Elliott
| Christian adaptation of Plato's ''Symposium'' focusing on virginity.
| Expands traditions surrounding apostolic martyrdom.
 
|}
 
====Why Did God Allow the Great Apostasy to Happen?====
A common objection to the doctrine of the Great Apostasy is that if God knew His Church would fall into apostasy, why would He allow it to happen? Why would God permit centuries of confusion and the loss of priesthood authority, revelation, and ordinances? Latter-day Saint theology answers that God does not force humanity to accept truth. Because agency is essential to God’s plan, He allows individuals and communities to choose whether they will accept or reject the light He offers.
 
The scriptures repeatedly show that God permits His children to exercise agency, even when those choices lead to spiritual consequences. The Lord declared, “Behold, here is the agency of man, and here is the condemnation of man; because that which was from the beginning is plainly manifest unto them, and they receive not the light” (Doctrine and Covenants 93:31).


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
Likewise, the Book of Mormon teaches that God “gave unto them that they should be agents unto themselves” (Doctrine and Covenants 101:78; see also 2 Nephi 2:16). Without the possibility of rejecting truth, there could be no meaningful exercise of faith, obedience, or repentance.
| c. 270–280
| Methodius of Olympus
| ''On Free Will''
| Theological Treatise
| Patristic
| Lycia
| Fragmentary
| Patristic quotations
| ANF
| Response to determinism.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
The Bible itself describes periods in which God’s people fell away from revealed truth. Ancient Israel repeatedly experienced cycles of revelation, apostasy, judgment, and restoration. The book of Judges describes how “every man did that which was right in his own eyes” (Judges 21:25) after turning away from God’s covenant. The prophets repeatedly warned Israel that rejecting God’s word would lead to the loss of greater light: “Therefore my people are gone into captivity, because they have no knowledge” (Isaiah 5:13).
| c. 270–280
 
| Methodius of Olympus
These patterns demonstrate that God allowing apostasy is not unique to Christianity’s history. Rather, it reflects a recurring pattern in which God honors human agency while continuing to prepare a way for restoration.
| ''On the Resurrection''
 
| Theological Treatise
The New Testament anticipated that a falling away would occur after the time of Christ and His apostles. Paul warned the Ephesian elders: “For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock” (Acts 20:29).
| Patristic
| Lycia
| Fragmentary
| Patristic quotations
| ANF
| Defense of bodily resurrection.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
These passages suggest that God did not allow the Apostasy because He was surprised by it. Rather, the scriptures indicate that God knew such a falling away would occur and prepared for its eventual restoration.
| c. 280
| Anonymous
| ''Apostolic Church Order''
| Church Order
| Church Order
| Egypt or Syria
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Funk
| Early compilation of apostolic regulations.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
The Doctrine and Covenants uses the parable of the wheat and the tares to describe this process. The Lord explained that after the apostles died, the adversary would sow corruption among the followers of Christ: “After they have fallen asleep the great persecutor of the church, the apostate, the whore, even Babylon… soweth the tares” (Doctrine and Covenants 86:3).
| c. 280
| Anonymous
| ''Pseudo-Clementine Homilies''
| Religious Romance / Dialogue
| Christian Pseudepigrapha
| Syria
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Rehm; Jones
| Presents Peter as defender of true Christianity against Simon Magus.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
However, this revelation also teaches that God preserved a faithful remnant and that the loss of the fulness of the gospel would not be permanent. The Lord declared that the wheat and the tares would grow together until the time of the harvest (Doctrine and Covenants 86:7–10). The purpose of the Restoration was therefore not to recover a completely extinguished faith, but to restore the fulness of the gospel and gather God’s covenant people in preparation for the final harvest.
| c. 280
 
| Anonymous
The Great Apostasy also served to demonstrate the need for the Restoration. The loss of priesthood authority, prophetic revelation, and saving ordinances showed that Christ’s Church could not be maintained solely through human effort. The Restoration was therefore not merely a reform movement but a divine renewal of authority and covenant. As the Lord declared, “The works, and the designs, and the purposes of God cannot be frustrated, neither can they come to nought” (Doctrine and Covenants 3:1).
| ''Pseudo-Clementine Recognitions''
 
| Religious Romance / Dialogue
God’s purposes continued even during the Apostasy. Just as the Lord preserved a faithful remnant of Israel despite periods of rebellion, He preserved truth and prepared the way for the Restoration. The Book of Mormon teaches that the Lord’s work continues despite opposition: “He doeth not anything save it be for the benefit of the world; for he loveth the world” (2 Nephi 26:24).
| Christian Pseudepigrapha
 
| Syria
Thus, the Great Apostasy was not a failure of God’s plan. It was a consequence of human agency, a fulfillment of scriptural prophecy, and part of the larger pattern of apostasy and restoration found throughout God’s dealings with His children. God allowed the loss of the fulness of the gospel because He permits His children to choose, but He also prepared from the beginning to restore the authority, covenants, and ordinances necessary for the salvation of all humanity.
| Complete
 
| Rufinus Latin translation
====Why 1820?====
| Rehm; Jones
One of the most natural questions a person can ask about the Restoration is why it took so long. If the priesthood authority and many "plain and precious" truths were lost following the deaths of the Apostles, why would God wait nearly eighteen centuries before restoring them? Why not restore the gospel in the fourth century, the eighth century, or during the Protestant Reformation? Latter-day Saint doctrine does not provide a complete answer to those questions. The Lord has never revealed every reason for His timing. Nevertheless, scripture, history, and the teachings of modern prophets together suggest a compelling cumulative explanation. While they may not demonstrate that the Restoration ''had'' to occur in 1820, they help us understand why that moment in history was uniquely fitting.
| Related to the ''Homilies'' but preserves different traditions.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
The Restoration was not simply a correction of a few theological errors. It inaugurated what Latter-day Saints call the "dispensation of the fulness of times" (Ephesians 1:10; Doctrine and Covenants 128:18), the final dispensation before the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. God was not merely restoring doctrines. He was restoring priesthood authority, bringing forth new scripture, revealing temple ordinances, gathering Israel on both sides of the veil, and establishing a Church intended to endure until Christ's return. Such a work required more than a willing prophet. It required a world that had been prepared to receive, preserve, and spread the Restoration. Throughout scripture, God often accomplishes His purposes by patiently preparing both people and circumstances over generations rather than by overriding history altogether. The Restoration appears to follow that same pattern.
| c. 280–300
| Anonymous
| ''Apocalypse of Paul''
| Apocalypse
| Christian Apocrypha
| Egypt
| Complete
| Numerous medieval manuscripts
| Elliott
| Influential vision of heaven and hell.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
History itself points toward the nineteenth century as an unusually favorable moment. For much of Christian history, governments treated religious dissent as both a theological and civil offense. New religious movements were often suppressed before they could take root. By Joseph Smith's day, however, the United States offered something unprecedented: constitutional protections for religious liberty, a population with high literacy rates, inexpensive printing, and a culture that encouraged religious inquiry. The Book of Mormon could be printed and distributed on a scale that would have been impossible centuries earlier. Missionaries could travel with increasing ease, and advances in communication and transportation would soon allow the restored gospel to spread throughout the world. The political, technological, and social conditions necessary for a permanent restoration had begun to converge.
| c. 280–300
 
| Anonymous
Those developments did not emerge in isolation. From a Latter-day Saint perspective, centuries of Christian reform also helped prepare the way. Men and women such as John Wycliffe, William Tyndale, Martin Luther, John Calvin, and John Wesley challenged religious corruption, translated the scriptures into the language of ordinary people, emphasized personal engagement with the Bible, and encouraged believers to seek a purer form of Christianity. Although Latter-day Saints believe these reformers did not restore priesthood authority or the fulness of the gospel, they nevertheless helped create a world increasingly receptive to the idea that God might yet do more. In that sense, the Reformation was not the Restoration itself, but an important step toward it.
| ''Apocalypse of Thomas''
 
| Apocalypse
The Book of Mormon adds another dimension to this picture. In 1 Nephi 13, Nephi foresaw that many "plain and precious" truths would be removed from the gospel as it passed through history. Whether through deliberate corruption, sincere misunderstanding, or simply the accumulation of centuries of tradition, religious institutions naturally develop a powerful inertia. Once a particular way of reading scripture becomes deeply established, even faithful believers often find it difficult to imagine that foundational assumptions could be mistaken. The Restoration therefore required more than correcting isolated doctrines. It required someone willing to ask whether prevailing religious narratives themselves were incomplete. Joseph Smith's First Vision began with precisely that kind of question. Rather than asking which denomination was the best expression of Christianity, he sought to know which church God Himself recognized. His willingness to seek revelation rather than rely solely upon inherited tradition distinguished him from many of his contemporaries.
| Christian Apocrypha
 
| Egypt
Latter-day Saints also believe that Joseph Smith was prepared for this work long before his birth. Scripture teaches that certain individuals were foreordained in the premortal life for sacred missions (Abraham 3:22–23), and Lehi identified Joseph Smith as the "choice seer" prophesied centuries earlier by Joseph of Egypt (2 Nephi 3). Although the reasons for Joseph's foreordination have not been fully revealed, it is reasonable within Latter-day Saint theology to conclude that he had demonstrated exceptional faithfulness before mortality and had been divinely prepared for this calling. His mortal life likewise displayed qualities the Restoration demanded: humility before God, openness to continuing revelation, remarkable resilience under persecution, and an extraordinary capacity to receive, organize, and teach new revelation. If God had spent centuries preparing the world for the Restoration, it is fitting that He would also prepare the prophet through whom that Restoration would come.
| Complete
| Latin manuscripts
| Elliott
| Eschatological revelations attributed to Thomas.
|-style="vertical-align:top;"
| c. 290
| Anonymous
| ''Acts of Philip'' (later sections)
| Acts
| Christian Apocrypha
| Asia Minor
| Fragmentary
| Greek manuscripts
| Schneemelcher
| Includes extensive miracle traditions.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
Taken together, these considerations form a persuasive cumulative case. God prepared nations through political and legal developments that protected religious liberty. He prepared societies through centuries of reform that rekindled a desire for scriptural truth. He prepared the world through advances in literacy, printing, communication, and transportation that would enable the restored gospel to endure and spread. He prepared a prophet who was foreordained, spiritually receptive, and willing to ask questions that others would not. Each consideration, standing alone, explains only part of the picture. Together, however, they paint a coherent portrait of divine providence unfolding over many centuries.
| c. 290
| Anonymous
| ''Acts of Andrew and Matthias''
| Acts
| Christian Apocrypha
| Egypt
| Fragmentary
| Greek manuscripts
| Elliott
| Late apostolic Acts tradition.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
Even so, it is important not to claim more than the evidence allows. This cumulative case does not prove that 1820 was the ''only'' possible time for the Restoration or that Joseph Smith was the ''only'' person whom God could have called. Latter-day Saint scripture does not reveal every reason for God's choices, and finite beings should be cautious about claiming insight into every aspect of divine providence. The purpose of these arguments is not to demonstrate necessity but to show fittingness. They explain why the timing of the Restoration makes sense within the broader sweep of sacred history.
| 290–300
| Anonymous
| ''Life of Adam and Eve'' (Christian expansion)
| Adamic Literature
| Christian Pseudepigrapha
| Mediterranean
| Complete
| Numerous manuscripts
| Johnson
| Christian adaptation of Jewish Adam traditions.


|-style="vertical-align:top;"
Ultimately, Christians already accept this kind of reasoning in many other contexts. Scripture says that Christ came "in the fulness of time" (Galatians 4:4), yet it does not explain why the Incarnation occurred in the first century rather than earlier or later. God waited centuries before delivering Israel from Egypt, generations before sending the Flood, and days before raising Lazarus. In each case, believers can identify reasons that illuminate God's timing without claiming to exhaust His purposes. The Restoration invites the same posture. Latter-day Saints can reasonably conclude that God inaugurated the Restoration when the world had been sufficiently prepared and through the prophet He had long prepared for that work. Beyond that, faith does not require complete knowledge of every divine reason. It requires confidence that the God who patiently guided history toward the Restoration knew precisely when its fulness of times had arrived.
| c. 300
| Anonymous
| ''Acts of the Apostles Peter and Paul'' (expanded form)
| Acts
| Christian Apocrypha
| Egypt
| Complete
| Greek manuscripts
| Elliott
| Expands traditions surrounding apostolic martyrdom.


|}
====Did God Abandon the World During the Great Apostasy?====
A common objection to the doctrine of the Great Apostasy is that if the Church of Jesus Christ disappeared from the earth, then God must have left humanity without divine guidance for centuries. Latter-day Saint theology rejects this conclusion. The Apostasy describes the loss of the authorized Church and its fulness of ordinances, not the absence of God’s influence, inspiration, or concern for His children.


====Why Did God Allow the Great Apostasy to Happen?====
The scriptures teach that God’s light continues to reach all people. The Doctrine and Covenants teaches that “the Spirit giveth light to every man that cometh into the world” (Doctrine and Covenants 84:46), and the Gospel of John similarly states that Christ is “the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world” (John 1:9). Even without the fulness of revealed truth, individuals could still receive inspiration, seek righteousness, and act according to the knowledge they possessed.


====Why 1820?====
The Book of Mormon teaches that God remembers and works with His children even when they lack complete knowledge. Alma taught that God “imparteth his words unto the children of men, yea, over all the face of the earth” (Alma 29:8). Likewise, Nephi taught that God “loveth his children” and provides opportunities for them to receive truth according to His wisdom (1 Nephi 10:17).
One of the most natural questions a person can ask about the Restoration is why it took so long. If the priesthood authority and many "plain and precious" truths were lost following the deaths of the Apostles, why would God wait nearly eighteen centuries before restoring them? Why not restore the gospel in the fourth century, the eighth century, or during the Protestant Reformation? Latter-day Saint doctrine does not provide a complete answer to those questions. The Lord has never revealed every reason for His timing. Nevertheless, scripture, history, and the teachings of modern prophets together suggest a compelling cumulative explanation. While they may not demonstrate that the Restoration ''had'' to occur in 1820, they help us understand why that moment in history was uniquely fitting.


The Restoration was not simply a correction of a few theological errors. It inaugurated what Latter-day Saints call the "dispensation of the fulness of times" (Ephesians 1:10; Doctrine and Covenants 128:18), the final dispensation before the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. God was not merely restoring doctrines. He was restoring priesthood authority, bringing forth new scripture, revealing temple ordinances, gathering Israel on both sides of the veil, and establishing a Church intended to endure until Christ's return. Such a work required more than a willing prophet. It required a world that had been prepared to receive, preserve, and spread the Restoration. Throughout scripture, God often accomplishes His purposes by patiently preparing both people and circumstances over generations rather than by overriding history altogether. The Restoration appears to follow that same pattern.
The Great Apostasy was therefore not a period in which God withdrew His love or ceased His work among humanity. Rather, it was a period in which the authorized means for receiving the fulness of the gospel—such as priesthood authority, prophetic revelation, and saving ordinances—were no longer fully available on the earth. God continued to guide individuals through conscience, inspiration, scripture, and the light of Christ while preparing the way for the Restoration.


History itself points toward the nineteenth century as an unusually favorable moment. For much of Christian history, governments treated religious dissent as both a theological and civil offense. New religious movements were often suppressed before they could take root. By Joseph Smith's day, however, the United States offered something unprecedented: constitutional protections for religious liberty, a population with high literacy rates, inexpensive printing, and a culture that encouraged religious inquiry. The Book of Mormon could be printed and distributed on a scale that would have been impossible centuries earlier. Missionaries could travel with increasing ease, and advances in communication and transportation would soon allow the restored gospel to spread throughout the world. The political, technological, and social conditions necessary for a permanent restoration had begun to converge.
The Restoration of the gospel through Joseph Smith was not a correction to a period of divine abandonment, but the continuation of God’s ongoing work to bless His children. Through the Restoration, God restored the authority, covenants, and ordinances necessary to bring the fulness of the gospel back to the earth and extend its blessings to all people.


Those developments did not emerge in isolation. From a Latter-day Saint perspective, centuries of Christian reform also helped prepare the way. Men and women such as John Wycliffe, William Tyndale, Martin Luther, John Calvin, and John Wesley challenged religious corruption, translated the scriptures into the language of ordinary people, emphasized personal engagement with the Bible, and encouraged believers to seek a purer form of Christianity. Although Latter-day Saints believe these reformers did not restore priesthood authority or the fulness of the gospel, they nevertheless helped create a world increasingly receptive to the idea that God might yet do more. In that sense, the Reformation was not the Restoration itself, but an important step toward it.
====The Fate of Those Living During the Great Apostasy====
A common objection to the doctrine of the Great Apostasy is that if the fulness of the gospel and priesthood authority were lost from the earth, many people must have lived and died without access to essential truths and ordinances. Latter-day Saint doctrine teaches that God’s plan accounts for this circumstance through the preaching of the gospel to the dead and the performance of ordinances on their behalf.


The Book of Mormon adds another dimension to this picture. In 1 Nephi 13, Nephi foresaw that many "plain and precious" truths would be removed from the gospel as it passed through history. Whether through deliberate corruption, sincere misunderstanding, or simply the accumulation of centuries of tradition, religious institutions naturally develop a powerful inertia. Once a particular way of reading scripture becomes deeply established, even faithful believers often find it difficult to imagine that foundational assumptions could be mistaken. The Restoration therefore required more than correcting isolated doctrines. It required someone willing to ask whether prevailing religious narratives themselves were incomplete. Joseph Smith's First Vision began with precisely that kind of question. Rather than asking which denomination was the best expression of Christianity, he sought to know which church God Himself recognized. His willingness to seek revelation rather than rely solely upon inherited tradition distinguished him from many of his contemporaries.
The Book of Mormon teaches that individuals are not condemned for lacking a law or knowledge they never received: “Where there is no law given there is no punishment; and where there is no punishment there is no condemnation” (2 Nephi 9:25). Similarly, Doctrine and Covenants 137:7 teaches that “all who have died without a knowledge of this gospel, who would have received it if they had been permitted to tarry, shall be heirs of the celestial kingdom of God.


Latter-day Saints also believe that Joseph Smith was prepared for this work long before his birth. Scripture teaches that certain individuals were foreordained in the premortal life for sacred missions (Abraham 3:22–23), and Lehi identified Joseph Smith as the "choice seer" prophesied centuries earlier by Joseph of Egypt (2 Nephi 3). Although the reasons for Joseph's foreordination have not been fully revealed, it is reasonable within Latter-day Saint theology to conclude that he had demonstrated exceptional faithfulness before mortality and had been divinely prepared for this calling. His mortal life likewise displayed qualities the Restoration demanded: humility before God, openness to continuing revelation, remarkable resilience under persecution, and an extraordinary capacity to receive, organize, and teach new revelation. If God had spent centuries preparing the world for the Restoration, it is fitting that He would also prepare the prophet through whom that Restoration would come.
The New Testament teaches that the gospel is preached to those who have died: “For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead” (1 Peter 4:6). Modern revelation further explains that those who did not receive the gospel during mortality have the opportunity to accept it in the spirit world and receive its blessings through obedience to the ordinances of God’s house (Doctrine and Covenants 138:58).


Taken together, these considerations form a persuasive cumulative case. God prepared nations through political and legal developments that protected religious liberty. He prepared societies through centuries of reform that rekindled a desire for scriptural truth. He prepared the world through advances in literacy, printing, communication, and transportation that would enable the restored gospel to endure and spread. He prepared a prophet who was foreordained, spiritually receptive, and willing to ask questions that others would not. Each consideration, standing alone, explains only part of the picture. Together, however, they paint a coherent portrait of divine providence unfolding over many centuries.
The Great Apostasy refers to the loss of priesthood authority, revelation, and the fulness of gospel ordinances from the earth; it does not mean that God abandoned His children or that every person who lived during that period was personally rejected by God. Individuals could still receive light, follow Christ according to the understanding available to them, and be judged according to their faithfulness.


Even so, it is important not to claim more than the evidence allows. This cumulative case does not prove that 1820 was the ''only'' possible time for the Restoration or that Joseph Smith was the ''only'' person whom God could have called. Latter-day Saint scripture does not reveal every reason for God's choices, and finite beings should be cautious about claiming insight into every aspect of divine providence. The purpose of these arguments is not to demonstrate necessity but to show fittingness. They explain why the timing of the Restoration makes sense within the broader sweep of sacred history.
The Restoration restored the ordinances and authority necessary for the salvation of all God’s children, including those who lived during periods when the fulness of the gospel was unavailable. Through Christ’s Atonement, missionary work in the spirit world, and temple ordinances performed on behalf of the dead, God provides every person with a fair opportunity to accept or reject the gospel.


Ultimately, Christians already accept this kind of reasoning in many other contexts. Scripture says that Christ came "in the fulness of time" (Galatians 4:4), yet it does not explain why the Incarnation occurred in the first century rather than earlier or later. God waited centuries before delivering Israel from Egypt, generations before sending the Flood, and days before raising Lazarus. In each case, believers can identify reasons that illuminate God's timing without claiming to exhaust His purposes. The Restoration invites the same posture. Latter-day Saints can reasonably conclude that God inaugurated the Restoration when the world had been sufficiently prepared and through the prophet He had long prepared for that work. Beyond that, faith does not require complete knowledge of every divine reason. It requires confidence that the God who patiently guided history toward the Restoration knew precisely when its fulness of times had arrived.
====How Would We Know Whether the Church is in Apostasy Today?====
 
Latter-day Saints believe that the Church will never fall into generalized apostasy like the early Church. This is based on several scriptures.
====Did God Abandon the World During the Great Apostasy?====
 
====The Fate of those living during the Great Apostasy====


====How Would We Know Whether the Church is in Apostasy Today?====
Some might ask how we might know whether the Church is in apostasy. What is more, these critics might ask how we can believe the Church is not in apostasy when it has strayed from some teachings that are clearly scriptural.


The answer to this question is that the Church has not strayed from essential teachings like the early Christians did.
{{endnotes sources}}
{{endnotes sources}}

Latest revision as of 23:11, 28 July 2026

This page is still under construction. We welcome any suggestions for improving the content of this FAIR Answers Wiki page.

The Great Apostasy

Summary: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints claims that it is the restored Church of Jesus Christ. Fundamental to that belief is that the Church was lost for a time. Without such a loss, there could have been no Restoration. Critics, and especially those who are of Protestant, Orthodox, or Catholic Christian background, have argued that the Latter-day Saint belief in the Great Apostasy is erroneous on many grounds. Some have argued that Christ never established an official institution during His mortal life. Others have argued that He did found a church, but that the church was never lost.

Regardless of the criticism, it is a valuable exercise for Latter-day Saints to consider the historical, scriptural, and theological grounding for their belief in the Great Apostasy. While some aspects of this belief lie beyond the ken of academics, Latter-day Saint belief is not contradicted by existing historical or scriptural evidence.


New Approaches to the Apostasy

In recent years, there has been a growing strain of Latter-day Saint scholars who have called for new approaches to the Apostasy. Some are concerned that traditional approaches—which have emphasized a dark pall of intellectual and spiritual rot that essentially covered all people from the death of the last Apostles to Joseph Smith's First Vision—are neither "pastorally productive," nor "intellectually defensible."[1]

The aim of this article will be to provide a narrative that is both intellectually defensible and pastorally productive.

Defining the Apostasy

Defining what the Apostasy actually was is a matter of great importance. Without this definition, we cannot assuage the concerns of those studying this topic. It is important to define the Apostasy using scripture.

The word apostasy comes from the Greek word ἀποστασία (ah-poh-stah-SEE-ah). The prefix ἀπο means "away," and στασίs means "standing." Thus, etymologically, we get "standing away" or "standing apart" as the meaning of the word. "The word means ‘rebellion,’ ‘mutiny,’ ‘revolt,’ or ‘revolution,’ and it is used in ancient contexts with reference to uprisings against established authority."[2]

In 2 Thessalonians, the apostle Paul said, "Let no man deceive you by any means: for [the Second Coming of Jesus Christ] shall not come, except there come a falling away ["ἀποστασία"] first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition" (2 Thessalonians 2:3).

Thus, in contrast to some who believe that external persecution was a primary cause of the Great Apostasy, the New Testament and other passages of scripture actually place internal rebellion as its primary cause. As we shall see, however, external persecution still played a role.

Mass internal rebellion is the primary cause and central, defining feature of the Great Apostasy, but rebellion against what? Ultimately, it was a rebellion against key, essential doctrines taught by Christ and His Apostles. When we talk about someone who is an "apostate" or "apostatizes" from the Church today, we are usually referring to someone who is openly rebelling against the Church and its authority.[3] This is the best way to make sense of the Great Apostasy.

This mass internal rebellion was brought about by those who belong to the "great and abominable church": any person or organization that fights against the progress of the Church of God. The desires of the great and abominable church are for the following:

  1. Riches, luxury, and sensual indulgence (1 Nephi 13:7–8).
  2. Worldly praise/status (1 Nephi 13:9).
  3. To harm and control God’s people (1 Nephi 13:9).
  4. To pervert truth so people are spiritually blinded (1 Nephi 13:26–27).
  5. To lead souls away from God (1 Nephi 13:6; 1 Nephi 14:3, 9–10).
  6. To have wide dominion/influence (1 Nephi 14:11).

Some have conceptualized the loss of priesthood authority, the changing of ordinances, and the corruption of scripture as part of the definition of the Great Apostasy. However, these are merely symptoms of the internal rebellion against key, essential doctrines of the Gospel of Jesus Christ as taught by His Apostles. The rebellion against these doctrines led to the creation of many different Christian groups, each of which did not fully align with New Testament teachings on how Christ's Church should be run and what its members should believe. The creators of these sects thus become the perpetrators of the Great Apostasy, and other Christians who belonged to these churches became the unfortunate and unwitting inheritors or victims of it.

The Establishment of Christ's Church

If Christ's official, institutional Church was lost, then it must have been established. However, many today doubt that Christ ever established such a church.

The word that Greek uses to describe such a church is "ἐκκλησία" (eh-clay-SEE-ah). In the Gospel of Matthew, after Christ praises Peter for receiving his testimony of Christ from heaven, Christ says, "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church [ἐκκλησίαν]; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it" (Matthew 16:18, emphasis added). This is one of the most explicit pieces of evidence in the New Testament that Christ meant to establish a church. In the next verse, Christ says, "And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven" (Matthew 16:19). What does the language of "binding" and "loosing" refer to? Protestant scholars assure us that this refers to the power of the Apostles to permit and ban various forms of behavior among the covenant people.[4] Matthew 18:18 confirms that all of the Twelve had this authority. This was the authority to establish doctrine for the Church (Acts 2:42). This authority is evident from the fact that one of the criteria for including a book in the New Testament canon was apostolicity—that is, the characteristic of having been written by an apostle.[5] The Apostles were also given power ("δύναμις" [DOO-nah-mees]) and authority ("ἐξουσία" [ex-oo-SEE-ah]) to cast out all devils (Matthew 10:1) and to cure diseases (Luke 9:1).

However, do the lone mentions of an "ἐκκλησία" in Matthew 16 and 18 establish that Christ meant to establish a church? Lothar Coenen expresses doubt in The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology that the uses of "ἐκκλησία" in the passages from Matthew 16 and 18 can be used to support the notion that Christ established an official, institutional church. They are indeed the only times in all the Gospels that "ἐκκλησία" is used. "In all probability," Coenen writes, "Jesus himself called together the Twelve, but did not found the 'ekklesia' as such in his own lifetime, not even through the institution of the Lord's Supper." However, "This by itself would not settle the question whether he intended the church to come into being."[6] This should not threaten Latter-day Saint belief. If Jesus at the very least came, taught His people, won them as followers, performed His Atonement, and gave His Apostles both authority to baptize and a commission to baptize His followers after His Ascension, the essential Latter-day Saint belief that Christ established a church is preserved.

New Testament data outside the Gospels obviously support the idea of an institutional church having been organized. Acts 2:37–47 describes believers (a) being baptized into the church, and (b) united by their common belief in apostolic teaching. In both disputed and undisputed Pauline writings, we get the same pattern of officers with authority and followers united by common belief in practice. Ernest Best notes how "[m]inistry in the church is described both in general terms (1 Thess. 5:12; Heb 13:7) and with a variety of more specific titles (e.g. deacons, 1 Tim. 3:8-13; bishops, 3:1-7; elders, 4:17-20...pastors, Eph. 4:11; and prophets, 1 Cor. 12:4-11) and their ministry was a gift from God (Rom. 12:4-8; Eph. 4:7-11)."[7] Paul's letters obviously describe real geographic locations where the Church had been established and where Paul had performed ministry.

In short, "Christ had followers, leaders, and rules. That certainly constitutes an organization."[8]

Was There a Unified Platform to Apostatize From?

Another question that has been raised is whether there was a unified church to apostatize from. Did the Church have any authoritative beliefs that all believers were bound to uphold? This question has been raised even by defenders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Former BYU professors and Latter-day Saint apologists Daniel C. Peterson and Stephen D. Ricks wrote:

Terms like "orthodoxy" and "heresy" seem increasingly—to modern objective scholarship—to be mere self-congratulatory epithets worked up by the victors in the dogmatic skirmishes of Christian history. In earliest Christianity, the two are often impossible to distinguish, at least without the benefit of hindsight. In many areas, the "heretics" were the established church, while the "orthodox" were the damnable minority. And this is not the case in later, "apostate" centuries. The New Testament itself contains conflicting perspectives and positions that, many scholars would contend, resist even the most determined harmonizer.[9]

This raises the obvious question: From what, then, did the earliest Christians apostatize from?

The answer may be something like this: there may be a subset of beliefs that had become binding on early Christians. On other issues, the New Testament and other early documents may have differed because no binding belief yet existed.

The Apostasy Predicted

Latter-day Saints have appealed to a variety of scriptures to support their belief in the Great Apostasy. Some of these scriptures are better to use than others. Some do not give good evidence to support belief in the Great Apostasy.

One scripture frequently used is Amos 8:11. It says, "Behold, the days come, saith the Lord God, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the Lord."

The most extensive evidence of an apostasy is found in the New Testament.[10][11]

Scripture Reynolds's Description
New Testament Prophecies of the Demise of Christ’s Church
Matthew 13:24–30 In the parable of the wheat and tares, Jesus describes the kingdom of God being filled with tares sown by his enemy, which are then allowed to grow until the harvest.
Matthew 24:5, 24 Jesus prophesies to his disciples that before his time comes, many false prophets and false Christs or messiahs will arise, deceiving many.
Acts 20:29-30 Luke records that Paul had called together the elders of the church in Ephesus to hear his farewell. He pled with them to take heed, for he knew that “grievous wolves” should come among them “not sparing the flock” (v. 29), and that even some of the elders themselves would “arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them” (v. 30).
Romans 11:19–21 Paul warns the Roman saints that just as apostate Israel had been cut off, so would the Christians should they fail to “continue in goodness” (v. 22).
2 Thessalonians 2:3–4 Paul prophesies that Christ would not return before the “falling away” (v. 3)—the apostasy—and the son of perdition be exposed.
1 Timothy 4:1–3 Paul prophesies of future times when Christians will leave the faith and give “heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils; speaking lies in hypocrisy;... forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats.”
2 Timothy 3:1–9, 12; 4:3–4 Paul speaks of a coming “perilous” (3:1) time when men, apparently affiliated with the church, will be wicked in so many ways, loving pleasures more than God. These “traitors” (3:4) will have “a form of godliness” (3:5), but they will deny the power that makes godliness possible in men. All that will live godly lives in Christ will suffer persecution (3:12). Apparently speaking again of these same traitors, Paul prophesies that in that future time, “they will not endure sound doctrine” (4:3), but will “turn away” (4:4) from the truth unto fables. And they will find teachers who will justify the indulgence of their lusts.
2 Peter 2:1–3 Peter prophesies not only that false teachers will come among the Christians, but also that many will follow “their pernicious ways" (v. 2).
Revelation 13:7 John is shown in his vision that the beast will “make war with the saints, and ... overcome them.”
Scripture Reynolds's Description
Evidences of First-Century Apostasy from the New Testament
John 6:66 Many of Jesus’s disciples left him because of his teachings.
Romans 1:8–32 Paul congratulates the Roman faithful and contrasts their case with that of those Christians “who hold the truth in unrighteousness” (v. 18), but who by their sins of idolatry, murder, homosexuality, and fornication have changed the truth of God into a lie and will receive severe judgment.
Romans 2:17–24 Paul confutes the Judaizers in the church who exalt themselves as circumcised Jews and defenders of the law, while they hypocritically commit all kinds of grievous sin and blaspheme the name of God among the Gentiles by their bad examples.
Romans 16:17–18 Paul recognizes that there are already some Roman Christians who “cause divisions and offenses contrary to the doctrine” (v. 17). These appear to be smooth speakers who deceive the simple believers with their “good words and fair speeches” (v. 18), but not in the service of Christ, but rather to make a living for themselves.
1 Corinthians 1:11–12; 3:4 Paul describes the splintering of churches as church members begin to proclaim allegiance to different leaders, such as Apollos and Paul, rather than Christ.
1 Corinthians 4:18 Pride in the church at Corinth causes some to reject the words of the apostle Paul.
1 Corinthians 5:1, 6 Fornication and incest are named as sins committed by, or perhaps between, church members.
1 Corinthians 10:14 Some Corinthian saints begin to engage in idolatry.
1 Corinthians 11:18–11, 29–30, 34 There are divisions and heresies among the Christians at Corinth. The Corinthians desecrate the sacrament by substituting for it pagan feasts. Because they take the sacrament unworthily, they eat and drink damnation to themselves, and many have been made weak and sickly or have even died for it. There are also other offenses which Paul hopes to straighten out when he comes.
1 Corinthians 14:1–37 There is confusion in the Corinthian church. Many are claiming to prophesy and to speak in tongues by inspiration. And the women, who should be silent, have joined in the fray. Paul pleads for good order and peace, which would be an indication that they were guided by God’s inspiration.
2 Corinthians 3:1; 72 Members begin to reject legitimate authority, and Paul’s credentials appear to be questioned.
2 Corinthians 6:14–17 Paul pleads with the Corinthians to separate themselves from the heathens with whom they seem to be joined in their lives. Specifically, they appear to be participating in idol worship at heathen temples.
2 Corinthians 11:3–4, 12–15 Paul argues to the Corinthian church that they should follow him rather than those who come preaching another Jesus, or another spirit or gospel. Paul recognizes his own weaknesses, but these others “are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ” (v. 13). But if Satan himself can be “transformed into an angel of light” (v. 14), it is not to be unexpected that his ministers should “ be transformed as the ministers of righteousness” (v. 15).
Galatians 1:6–9; 3:1 Local leaders and false teachers are changing the gospel of Christ and are preaching “another gospel” (v. 6) as the truth. Paul marvels that the Christians there are “so soon removed from him” (v. 6) to these teachers of other gospels, and he curses all who are preaching their own gospels.
Galatians 4:8–11; 5:7, 15–22 Paul bemoans the retrogression of the church membership for their disobedience, their backbiting among church members, and their observation of pagan and Jewish holidays. He calls on them to stand fast in their Christian liberty gained through the atonement of Christ and not to let themselves get entangled again with the works of the flesh—“adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like” (5:21)—of which he has warned them before. The sense is clearly that some significant part of the Galatian members have returned to their sinful ways.
Ephesians 4:1–5:21 Paul describes for the Christians in Ephesus the kinds of lives, the unity, and spiritual consistency that they can enjoy, if they would live according to “the vocation wherewith [they] are called” (4:1). If they will heed his call, they can come to a “unity of the faith... unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ... [and] be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive” (4:13-14). In the process, he names a long list of sinful acts that are preventing them from leaving the world of the Gentiles and establishing a community of perfected saints. Paul calls them to stop walking “as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind” (4:17), with their “understanding darkened being alienated from God . . . because of the blindness of their heart” (4:18). As converts to Christ, they are taught to put off works of greediness and lasciviousness. They must put away lying, anger, stealing, bitterness, and evil speaking. He pleads with them to become “followers of God ... walking] in love” (5:1-2). If they would do this and be proper saints, such sins as fornication, uncleanness, covetousness, filthiness, foolish talk and jesting would never need to be named among

them. But whatever the vain men among them might say, “no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ” (5:5-6). But all things which are shameful even to speak of, that are being done in secret, shall be “made manifest by the light” (5:13). Again, he pleads with them that they be “not unwise . . . [and] drunk with wine” (5:17-18), but that they be filled with the Spirit.

Colossians 2:8–9, 18 Paul writes to the faithful brethren at Colosse and encourages them to stand fast in the gospel of Christ that he taught them and not to heed the beguiling men who seek to spoil them through philosophy and vain deceit, after the traditions of men.
2 Thessalonians 2:7–9 Paul calls upon the Christians of Thessaly to withstand the strong delusions and lying wonders of their times. If they can stand fast, they will obtain the love and glory of Christ.
2 Thessalonians 3:6 Paul further notes that the Thessalonians are supporting disorderly busybodies who do not accept Paul’s epistles. He calls on local believers to separate themselves from such and not to support their leadership.
1 Timothy 1:3–4, 6–7, 19–20 Paul explains why he left Timothy at Ephesus to call upon those Christians who were teaching false doctrines, “fables and endless genealogies” (v. 4), which only raise questions without edifying. These teachings have caused some to swerve and turn aside “unto vain jangling; desiring to be teachers of the law” (vv.6-7) but without understanding. While among his own disciples, Timothy has been faithful, Hymenaeus and Alexander have blasphemed and “made shipwreck” (v. 19) of their faith, and Paul has delivered them to the buffetings of Satan.
1 Timothy 5:15 Paul advises Timothy about how to address growing domestic apostasies in the Church and acknowledges that through these problems, members have “already turned aside after Satan.”
1 Timothy 6:1–10 Paul instructs Timothy on how to distinguish in the church between faithful teachers of godliness and those who are seeking the praise and riches of this world. The teaching of the latter group is marked by envy, strife, and “perverse disputings” (v. 5) that are destitute of truth. Those who love money rather than godliness “fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts” (v. 9).
1 Timothy 6:20–21 Timothy is further warned to beware those Christians who profess the faith, but who are engaged in “profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science, falsely so called” (v. 20).
2 Timothy 1:8–18; 2:16–18; 4:14–17 Paul writes Timothy to encourage him not to be ashamed of his testimony of Jesus or of his affiliation with Paul. He cites two prominent Christians by name as examples and complains “that all they which are in Asia be turned away from me” (1:15). He excepts “the house of Onesiphorus” of Ephesus who “refreshed” Paul and was “not ashamed of [Paul’s] chain” (1:16). Timothy is warned specifically to avoid “profane and vain babblings” (2:16); for they will increase unto more ungodliness, as in the cases of Hymenaeus and Philetus, who are teaching a false understanding of the resurrection. Further, Paul recites the specific case of a coppersmith who did Paul “much evil,”for he “greatly withstood our words” (4:14-15). And no one in the congregation would stand with Paul against him.
Titus 1:10–14 Paul left Titus in Crete specifically “to set in order the things that are wanting” (v. 5). He is warned to be careful who he selects to be elders or bishops because “there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers . . . who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake” (vv. 10-11). Paul hopes that sharp rebukes may return them to soundness of faith, so that they will no longer give “heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth” (v. 14).
Titus 2:1–15 Paul exhorts Titus to set the church in order, as all age groups from both sexes need to be raised from inappropriate behavior, that Christ might “redeem [them] from all iniquity and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works” (v. 14).
Titus 3:9–11 Paul goes on to enumerate other failings of the members, which he seems to think can be corrected by Titus’s teaching. But he also recognizes the serious dangers of those who are focused on “foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law” (v. 9). If a man maintains his heretical position after being admonished a second time, Titus is to reject him as a sinner and subverter of others.
James 1–2 James recognizes that all are tempted and that the members of the church must not only speak the truth, but their lives must reflect comparable good works. Otherwise their religion is vain. In addition to other sins, he emphasizes the practice of despising the poor and ignoring the teaching of Christ to love their neighbor. For until their works meet these expectations of Christ, their faith is dead.
James 4:1–8 James describes “wars and fightings” (v. 1) among the Christians which arise from their own lusts. Calling them adulterers and enemies to God, he urges them to be humble and resist the devil, that God may cleanse their hands and purify their double-minded hearts.
2 Peter 2:1–22; 3:16–18 Peter warns the members against those of their own number who engage in all kinds of sins, including “damnable heresies” (2:1), covetousness, walking “after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness” (2:10), evil speaking, “having eyes full of adultery” (2:14). These have all gone astray. For having once escaped the world “through the knowledge of the Lord” (2:20), and becoming again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. They exemplify the proverbs of the dog that is turned to his own vomit and the washed sow that returns to wallowing in the mire (2:22). After discussing false teachings by scoffers in the church, he warns the members again not to wrest the scriptures or to be led away by the errors of the wicked, but to remain steadfast and grow in grace and in the knowledge of the Lord (3:16-18).
1 John 2:9–27; 4:1 John warns the members that any who hate their brothers are in darkness. He warns them not to love the world, the lusts of the flesh or the pride of the eyes, as these things are “not of the Father” (2:16). For “even now are there many antichrists” (2:18), that arose from within the church. But now they deny the Father and the Son. But the anointing which the members have received can protect them from these seducers. Further, because there are many false prophets, James teaches those who would be faithful how to distinguish the true from the false.
3 John 1:9–10 A prideful and apostate local leader, presumably an elder or a bishop, rejects apostolic authority and even excommunicates those who stand up for the apostles.
Jude 1:3–19 Jude writes to the faithful who he fears have been taken in by ungodly men who have crept in unawares, denying Christ and turning his grace into lasciviousness. Jude invokes the Old Testament and other writings as examples and prophecies of this kind of thing and calls the ungodly among them “murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men’s persons in admiration because of advantage” (v. 16).
Revelations 2–3 John sees the Son of Man, who commands him to write to the seven churches. Ephesus has done many good things, is now fallen and must repent, having left the Lord (2:5-6). The church in Pergamos has held fast against Satan, but harbors proponents of the doctrine of Balaam who eat meat sacrificed to idols and commit fornication. There are also Christians there who hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which the Lord hates (2:12-16). In spite of many good works, the church at Thyatira permits Jezebel to pass herself off as a prophetess while seducing the Lord’s servants to fornicate and to eat things sacrificed unto idols (2:18-20). There appear to be only a few members in Sardis who “have not defiled their garments” and who are worthy to walk with the Lord (3:1-6). Laodiceans focused on wealth, are comfortable and do not recognize their need for the Lord’s aid. They are neither cold nor hot, and the Lord will spew them out (3:16-17).

Teeing the Ball Up: The Loss of Apostolic Authority

Doctrine and Covenants 86 presents the Apostles as the original sowers of the gospel in the Savior's Parable of the Wheat and the Tares. According to the revelation, they planted the "good seed," but after they "fell asleep" (that is, after their deaths), the adversary sowed tares among the wheat, symbolizing the introduction of corruption and false teachings into the Church (Doctrine & Covenants 86:1–3). Unlike some earlier Latter-day Saint interpretations that suggested the wheat disappeared entirely, this revelation teaches that the wheat continued to exist alongside the tares until the last days, when the Lord would begin the work of gathering and separating them. Thus, Doctrine and Covenants 86 portrays the Apostles as faithfully establishing Christ's Church and attributes the subsequent Apostasy to the enemy's efforts after their ministry ended, while emphasizing that God preserved faithful believers ("the wheat") until the Restoration and the final gathering.

The Fate of the Apostles

The best historical scholarship available places the death of the last Apostle as early 100 AD and as late as 107 AD.[12]

Apostle Location Killed By Reason Manner Source Date Historical Likelihood
The Fate of the Apostles
Peter Rome, Italy Roman authorities under Emperor Nero Preaching Christ during the Roman persecution of Christians after the Great Fire of Rome in (c. AD 64–67). Crucified Tradition 64–68 AD Moderate-High
Andrew Patras, Greece Roman governor of Achaia Refused to stop preaching Christianity. Crucified Tradition 60 AD Low-Moderate
James G Jerusalem Herod Agrippa To please certain Jewish leaders who opposed the Christian movement (Acts 12:1–2). Beheaded Acts 12 44 AD High
John Ephesus None Exiled to Patmos under Roman authority for preaching the Gospel (Revelation 1:9), then made a translated being (3 Nephi 28:6–8; Doctrine and Covenants 7:2–3). Natural Tradition 100 AD Moderate
Philip Hierapolis Local authorities in Phrygia Converted prominent individuals and challenged paganism. Crucified Apocrypha 80 AD Low
Bartholomew Armenia Armenian or local pagan rulers Converted members of the royal family to Christianity. Flayed Tradition 69–71 AD Low
Thomas Chennai, India Local rulers in India Converted many people, including members of the nobility. Speared Tradition 72 AD Moderate
Matthew Ethiopia Local rulers Refused to stop teaching and converting people. Natural or Stabbed Legend 68 AD Low
James L Jerusalem Jewish religious leaders Preached that Jesus was the Messiah Stoned Josephus 62 AD Low
Jude Persia/Beirut Local authorities in Persia Missionary activities and conversions Beaten/Axed Apocrypha 65 AD Low
Simon Persia Persian or Roman authorities Preaching Christianity Sawn Tradition 65–107 AD Low
Judas Jerusalem Himself After betraying Jesus, he died in remorse (Matthew 27:3–5; Acts 1:18–19 describes the aftermath differently). Suicide Math. 27 / Acts 1 AD 30–33 High
Matthias Jerusalem or Colchis Jewish religious authorities For preaching Christ as the Messiah Stoned or Crucified Tradition 80 AD Moderate
Three Nephite Apostles New World None Asked Jesus to become translated beings Translated The Book of Mormon AD 33–34 High
Nine Other Nephite Apostles New World None Asked to finish their ministry and then “speedily come unto [Christ],” and Jesus promised that after they were 72 years old, they would come to Him (3 Nephi 28:2–3). Mormon later summarizes: after about 100 years, “the disciples of Jesus . . . had all gone to the paradise of God, save it were the three who should tarry” (4 Nephi 1:14). Natural The Book of Mormon AD 33–AD 134 High
Scripture Outside the Model
The Apostle John and the Three Nephites

Some have argued that Latter-day Saints do not truly believe Apostolic authority ceased on the earth since Latter-day Saints also affirm that John the Beloved and the Three Nephites (who were ordained as members of the Twelve during Jesus's New World ministry) held such apostolic authority.

However, these men are now translated beings. According to Mark L. McConkie, "Latter-day Saint scriptures speak of a unique class of beings, persons whom the Lord has 'translated' or changed from a mortal state to one in which they are temporarily not subject to death, and in which they experience neither pain nor sorrow except for the sins of the world. Such beings appear to have much greater power than mortals. All translated beings will eventually experience physical death and resurrection (MD, p. 807-808). Translation is a necessary condition in special instances to further the work of the Lord."[13]

John the Apostle "desired [of Christ] that he might bring souls unto [him]," or "that he might do more, or a greater work yet among men than what he has before done" (Doctrine & Covenants 7:4-5). He was made "as a flaming fire and a ministering angel" to "minister for those who shall be heirs of salvation who dwell on the earth" (Doctrine & Covenants 7:6).

The Three Nephites were made to do a similar work that John the Apostle did. Prior to the great apostasy, Mormon records that they ministered unto "all the people," uniting and baptizing as many as would believe into the Church (3 Nephi 28:18). They apparently ministered unto Mormon and Moroni (3 Nephi 28:26; Mormon 8:11). The Lord took them away from the Nephites, though, because of their prevailing wickedness (Mormon 1:13). Mormon tells us that there would be a moment in the Lord's timetable in which they would again "minister unto all the scattered tribes of Israel, and unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people, and shall bring out of them unto Jesus many souls, that their desire may be fulfilled, and also because of the convincing power of God which is in them" (3 Nephi 28:29). By praying to God they can show themselves unto whomever seems good to them (3 Nephi 28:30).

Neither John the Apostle nor the Three Nephites were authorized to lead the Church during the Great Apostasy. Neither were given the authority to perform saving and exalting ordinances during the Great Apostasy. Both functioned as ministering angels. A ministering angel is not necessarily one that has to convert you to the religion. They can comfort you in times of affliction, annoyance, or discomfort. They can guide you and instruct you gently toward the light in moments of confusion. They don't have to baptize and convert you. John and the Three Nephites will remain in this state until they are resurrected.

John's and the Three Nephites' existence as ministering angels does not negate the Latter-day Saint belief in the loss of Apostolic authority or in the Great Apostasy.

The Key Doctrines

As mentioned before, the Apostasy was the result of key doctrines being rebelled against. Below, we explore some of the possibilities.

An Embodied God

By the 2nd century, Christians were teaching that God created the universe out of nothing. As observed by James Hubler,

Creatio ex nihilo appeared suddenly in the latter half of the second century c.e. Not only did creatio ex nihilo lack precedent, it stood in firm opposition to all the philosophical schools of the Greco-Roman world. As we have seen, the doctrine was not forced upon the Christian community by their revealed tradition, either in Biblical texts or the Early Jewish interpretation of them. As we will also see it was not a position attested in the New Testament doctrine or even sub-apostolic writings. It was a position taken by the apologists of the late second century, Tatian and Theophilus, and developed by various ecclesiastical writers thereafter, by Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Origen. Creatio ex nihilo represents an innovation in the interpretive traditions of revelation and cannot be explained merely as a continuation of tradition.[14]

Tatian and Theophilus died by AD 185. Irenaeus (191 AD), Origen (253 AD), and Tertullian (220 AD) all died by the third century AD. This doctrine they taught contravened the Bible. John 17:3 teaches, “And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.” By not knowing the true God, the Christians certainly fell into apostasy.

The Mode of Baptism

Changes to the mode of baptism may also be viewed as evidence of the Great Apostasy because they altered the ordinance's symbolic connection to the atoning death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. The New Testament consistently portrays baptism by immersion as a reenactment of the Savior's burial and resurrection. Paul taught, "Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead...even so we also should walk in newness of life" (Romans 6:4; see also Romans 6:3–5). Going down into the water symbolizes Christ's death and burial, while rising from the water symbolizes His resurrection and the believer's new life in Christ.

This symbolism is more than an illustrative ritual—it teaches fundamental truths about the Atonement. Baptism unites the believer with Christ's redemptive work, signifying the death of the "old man" of sin and rebirth through the power of the Resurrection. Because the ordinance itself preaches the gospel, preserving its divinely revealed form is significant.

The earliest Christians generally practiced baptism by immersion where circumstances permitted, a practice reflected in the New Testament and supported by many early Christian writings. Over time, however, affusion (pouring) and eventually sprinkling became increasingly common, particularly in cases involving the sick, infants, or practical necessity, and later gained broader ecclesiastical acceptance. While many Christians viewed these developments as legitimate adaptations, Latter-day Saints see them as evidence that the original ordinance had been modified after the loss of apostolic authority.

From a Latter-day Saint perspective, the issue is not merely one of ritual preference but of preserving the doctrine embodied in the ordinance itself. If baptism is intended to represent participation in Christ's death, burial, and resurrection, then changing its mode necessarily weakens or obscures that symbolism. The Restoration's return to baptism by immersion under proper priesthood authority is therefore understood as a restoration of both the ordinance and the profound doctrine of the Atonement that the ordinance was designed to proclaim.

Closing the Canon

The widespread belief that the canon of scripture had permanently closed may itself be evidence of the Great Apostasy. Although the process of recognizing the books of the New Testament unfolded gradually over several centuries, by the fourth and fifth centuries, many Christians had come to regard the biblical canon as complete and closed, with no expectation of additional scripture or authoritative revelation.

Throughout the Bible, God consistently speaks to His children through living prophets, adding new revelation as circumstances require. The Old Testament was supplemented by the New Testament, and neither Jesus nor His apostles taught that God would forever cease revealing His word after the apostolic age. Instead, the New Testament encourages believers to "despise not prophesyings" (1 Thessalonians 5:20), to "covet to prophesy" (1 Corinthians 14:39), and teaches that Christ gave apostles and prophets "for the perfecting of the saints...till we all come in the unity of the faith" (Ephesians 4:11–13).

If God truly intends to guide His Church through continuing revelation, then the loss of that expectation represents a profound spiritual change. The conviction that God had finished speaking effectively removed the expectation of new prophets, new scripture, and divine direction for new circumstances. Latter-day Saints, therefore, see the doctrine of a closed canon not merely as a theological conclusion, but as a symptom of a Church that no longer expected or received the revelatory voice of God.

This perspective does not imply that God abandoned humanity or ceased inspiring individuals. Rather, it suggests that the institutional Church gradually lost the prophetic authority through which binding revelation for the whole Church was received. The Restoration's claim of continuing revelation and an open canon is therefore not an innovation but a return to the biblical pattern, in which God repeatedly declares, "Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets" (Amos 3:7). The Restoration's addition of the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and ongoing prophetic revelation reflects the conviction that a living God continues to speak to His children today.

Other "Plain and Precious" Truths Lost
  • Three Degrees of Glory
  • Baptism for the dead
  • Faith and works
The Change of Covenants

Nephi mentions "covenants" that were taken out of the Bible. What could these covenants refer to?

BYU professors Nicolas J. Frederick and Joseph M. Spencer argue that the Book of Mormon presents the Great Apostasy primarily as the rise of replacement theology—the belief that the Christian Church permanently replaced Israel as God's covenant people. They contend that the Book of Mormon emphasizes a remnant theology, teaching that God's covenants with Israel remain in force and that Gentiles are invited to be grafted into those covenants rather than supplant Israel. They build this case primarily from 1 Nephi 13, arguing that the "plain and precious things" removed from the Bible largely concerned God's enduring covenant with Israel and its future gathering. They reinforce this interpretation with 2 Nephi 25–30, Jacob 5, 3 Nephi 16, 20, and 21, and Mormon 5, all of which emphasize Israel's eventual restoration and the centrality of the gathering of Israel in the last days. They also appeal to Romans 9–11, particularly Paul's olive tree analogy, along with the Abrahamic covenant in Genesis 12 and Isaiah's prophecies of Israel's restoration, to argue that both the Bible and the Book of Mormon teach that Gentile Christians become part of Israel's covenant family rather than replacing it. In their view, the Restoration restores this covenant-centered understanding of God's work, making the gathering of Israel—not merely the reestablishment of ecclesiastical authority—the defining answer to the Great Apostasy.[15]

Cherubim and a Flaming Sword: The Corruption of Scripture Guarding the Way Back from the Apostasy

In 1 Nephi 13, Nephi sees that the Bible originally went forth from the Jews in purity, containing the "fulness of the gospel" and many "plain and precious" truths. However, after it passed through the hands of a "great and abominable church," many of these plain and precious parts were removed before the Bible reached the Gentiles. As a result, many people stumbled spiritually, became confused about essential doctrines, and fell under the influence of false traditions. Nevertheless, Nephi also sees that God would not abandon humanity: He would bring forth additional scripture—most notably the Book of Mormon—to restore many of the lost truths, establish the truth of the Bible as far as it had been preserved, and help gather Israel and bring people to a knowledge of Jesus Christ and His gospel.

Nephi's vision varies in claiming that many plain and precious things are taken out of the Bible (1 Nephi 13:29) or taken out of the gospel (1 Nephi 13:26). Nephi also mentions "covenants" that have been taken away (1 Nephi 13:26). These plain and precious parts were taken away by "the great and abominable church" so "that they might pervert the right ways of the Lord, that they might blind the eyes and harden the hearts of the children of men (vv. 26–27). Here, we have a clear distinction between the perpetrators and their unfortunate victims whom they have blinded and whose hearts they have hardened against the true church.

The great and abominable church sought to "pervert the right ways of the Lord" (v. 27). The angel tells Nephi, "Behold the gold, and the silver, and the silks, and the scarlets, and the fine-twined linen, and the precious clothing, and the harlots, are the desires of this great and abominable church" (1 Nephi 13:8).

The most thorough treatment of this topic was done by Latter-day Saint scholar and Egyptologist John Gee in a book chapter he authored in 2005.[16]

The Great Splintering: Patristic and Historical Evidence for the Apostasy

Further evidence for the Great Apostasy can be found in the writings of early Christian fathers (the study of which is known as patristics or patrology) and Christian apocryphal writings.

When approaching these writings, it is important to keep their chronological context in mind. This helps in determining when the Great Apostasy might have been complete. Below is a series of tables that organize these writings chronologically and that can be viewed when desired.

Chronology of Early Christian Writings (A.D. 30–300)

This chronology includes the major surviving writings of early Christianity, including the New Testament, Apostolic Fathers, Church Fathers, apologetic works, church orders, martyr literature, biblical commentaries, Christian apocrypha, Christian pseudepigrapha, Gnostic literature, and important lost works.

Approx. Date Author Work Genre Category Place of Composition Survival Status Principal Manuscript(s) Standard English Edition(s) Notes
Chronology of Early Christian Writings (AD 0–AD 300)
48–50 Paul Epistle to the Galatians Epistle New Testament Galatia or Antioch (disputed) Complete Codices Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Alexandrinus Nestle-Aland 28; Holmes; Loeb Earliest surviving Christian document according to most scholars.
50–51 Paul First Epistle to the Thessalonians Epistle New Testament Corinth Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Alexandrinus NA28; Holmes Earliest extant letter to a Christian congregation.
51–52 Paul Second Epistle to the Thessalonians Epistle New Testament Corinth (traditional) Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Pauline authorship debated by some scholars.
53–55 Paul First Epistle to the Corinthians Epistle New Testament Ephesus Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Addresses divisions, worship, resurrection, and ethics.
55–56 Paul Second Epistle to the Corinthians Epistle New Testament Macedonia Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Collection of multiple Pauline letters according to many scholars.
56–57 Paul Epistle to the Romans Epistle New Testament Corinth Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Paul's longest and most systematic theological letter.
60–62 Paul Epistle to the Philippians Epistle New Testament Rome (traditional) Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Prison epistle.
60–62 Paul Epistle to Philemon Epistle New Testament Rome (traditional) Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Shortest Pauline letter.
60–62 Paul (traditional) Epistle to the Colossians Epistle New Testament Rome Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Pauline authorship disputed by many scholars.
60–62 Paul (traditional) Epistle to the Ephesians Epistle New Testament Rome Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Circular letter according to many scholars.
62–64 Paul (traditional) First Epistle to Timothy Epistle New Testament Macedonia (traditional) Complete Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus NA28 One of the Pastoral Epistles.
62–64 Paul (traditional) Epistle to Titus Epistle New Testament Macedonia or Nicopolis Complete Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus NA28 Pastoral Epistle.
64–67 Paul (traditional) Second Epistle to Timothy Epistle New Testament Rome Complete Sinaiticus NA28 Traditionally regarded as Paul's final letter.
65–70 John Mark (traditional) Gospel according to Mark Gospel New Testament Rome (traditional) Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Earliest canonical Gospel according to the majority of scholars.
70–90 Anonymous Didache Church Order Apostolic Fathers Syria (probably) Complete Codex Hierosolymitanus (1056) Holmes; Ehrman Earliest surviving Christian church manual.
70–90 Anonymous Gospel according to Matthew Gospel New Testament Antioch? (traditional scholarly proposal) Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Probably dependent upon Mark and other traditions.
80–90 Anonymous Epistle to the Hebrews Homily / Epistle New Testament Unknown Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Anonymous in the earliest manuscripts.
80–90 Anonymous Gospel according to Luke Gospel New Testament Greece or Asia Minor (disputed) Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 First volume of Luke–Acts.
80–90 Anonymous Acts of the Apostles History New Testament Greece or Asia Minor Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Second volume of Luke–Acts.
80–95 Anonymous Epistle of James Epistle New Testament Palestine? (disputed) Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Traditionally attributed to James the brother of Jesus.
80–95 Anonymous First Epistle of Peter Epistle New Testament Rome ("Babylon") Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Petrine authorship debated.
80–100 Clement of Rome First Epistle of Clement Epistle Apostolic Fathers Rome Complete Codex Alexandrinus; Codex Hierosolymitanus Holmes; Lightfoot Earliest surviving post-apostolic Christian letter.
85–95 Anonymous Gospel according to John Gospel New Testament Ephesus (traditional) Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Distinctive theological portrait of Jesus.
90–95 Anonymous First Epistle of John Epistle New Testament Asia Minor Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Closely related to the Fourth Gospel.
90–95 Anonymous Second Epistle of John Epistle New Testament Asia Minor Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Shortest New Testament epistle by verse count.
90–95 Anonymous Third Epistle of John Epistle New Testament Asia Minor Complete Sinaiticus, Vaticanus NA28 Personal letter concerning church leadership.
90–96 John of Patmos Revelation Apocalypse New Testament Patmos Complete Sinaiticus; Alexandrinus NA28 Earliest surviving Christian apocalypse in the canon.
90–100 Anonymous Odes of Solomon Hymns Christian Pseudepigrapha Syria Complete Syriac manuscripts; Papyrus Bodmer XI (fragments) Charlesworth; Lattke Earliest substantial Christian hymn collection.
95–120 Anonymous Ascension of Isaiah (Christian recension) Apocalypse Christian Pseudepigrapha Syria or Palestine Complete Ethiopic manuscripts; Latin & Slavonic fragments Charlesworth; Knibb Composite work containing an early Christian vision of Christ's descent and ascent.
100–110 Ignatius of Antioch Epistle to the Ephesians Epistle Apostolic Fathers Smyrna Complete Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus; later manuscripts Holmes; Lightfoot One of the seven authentic letters written while en route to martyrdom.
100–110 Ignatius of Antioch Epistle to the Magnesians Epistle Apostolic Fathers Smyrna Complete Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus Holmes; Lightfoot Emphasizes unity under the bishop.
100–110 Ignatius of Antioch Epistle to the Trallians Epistle Apostolic Fathers Smyrna Complete Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus Holmes; Lightfoot Warns against false teaching.
100–110 Ignatius of Antioch Epistle to the Romans Epistle Apostolic Fathers Smyrna Complete Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus Holmes; Lightfoot Famous for Ignatius's desire for martyrdom.
100–110 Ignatius of Antioch Epistle to the Philadelphians Epistle Apostolic Fathers Troas Complete Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus Holmes; Lightfoot Encourages ecclesiastical unity.
100–110 Ignatius of Antioch Epistle to the Smyrnaeans Epistle Apostolic Fathers Troas Complete Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus Holmes; Lightfoot Strong affirmation of Christ's true humanity.
100–110 Ignatius of Antioch Epistle to Polycarp Epistle Apostolic Fathers Troas Complete Codex Mediceo-Laurentianus Holmes; Lightfoot Personal letter to Polycarp of Smyrna.
100–120 Polycarp of Smyrna Epistle to the Philippians Epistle Apostolic Fathers Smyrna Complete Codex Vaticanus Graecus 859; later manuscripts Holmes; Lightfoot Frequently quotes New Testament writings.
100–130 Papias of Hierapolis Exposition of the Sayings of the Lord Commentary Apostolic Fathers Hierapolis Fragmentary Preserved principally in Eusebius Holmes (fragments); Ehrman Earliest extant discussion of the origins of Matthew and Mark.
100–130 Anonymous Shepherd of Hermas Apocalypse / Parable Apostolic Fathers Rome Complete Codex Sinaiticus; Codex Athous Holmes; Ehrman Highly regarded by many second-century Christians.
100–130 Anonymous Gospel of the Hebrews Gospel Christian Apocrypha Egypt or Syria Fragmentary Quotations in Jerome and others Schneemelcher; Elliott Used by some Jewish-Christian communities.
100–130 Anonymous Gospel of the Nazarenes Gospel Christian Apocrypha Syria Fragmentary Quotations in Jerome Schneemelcher; Elliott Closely related to Matthew.
100–130 Anonymous Gospel of the Ebionites Gospel Harmony Christian Apocrypha Transjordan or Syria Fragmentary Quotations in Epiphanius Schneemelcher; Elliott Omits the infancy narratives.
110–135 Anonymous Apocalypse of Peter Apocalypse Christian Apocrypha Egypt Partial (Greek); Complete (Ethiopic recension) Akhmim Codex; Ethiopic manuscripts Schneemelcher; Elliott Widely read in the second century and included in some early canon lists.
110–140 Anonymous Preaching of Peter (Kerygma Petrou) Apologetic Treatise Christian Apocrypha Alexandria (possibly) Fragmentary Clement of Alexandria and others Schneemelcher Survives only in quotations.
120–135 Anonymous Epistle of Barnabas Epistle Apostolic Fathers Alexandria Complete Codex Sinaiticus Holmes; Lightfoot Presents an allegorical interpretation of the Old Testament.
125–140 Quadratus of Athens Apology Apology Apologetic Athens Fragmentary Preserved in Eusebius Ehrman Earliest known Christian apology.
125–145 Aristides of Athens Apology Apology Apologetic Athens Complete Syriac manuscript; Armenian version ANF; Ehrman Addressed to Emperor Hadrian or Antoninus Pius.
130–150 Hegesippus Memoirs (Hypomnemata) Church History Patristic Probably Rome Fragmentary Preserved in Eusebius ANF (fragments) One of the earliest Christian historical works.
135–150 Anonymous Protoevangelium of James Infancy Gospel Christian Apocrypha Egypt or Syria Complete Bodmer Papyrus V; numerous later manuscripts Schneemelcher; Elliott Principal source for later traditions concerning Mary's childhood.
c. 140 Marcion Antitheses Theological Treatise Heterodox Rome Lost Reconstructed from patristic quotations Harnack Contrasted the God of the Old Testament with the Father of Jesus.
c. 140 Marcion Evangelion (Marcion's Gospel) Gospel Heterodox Rome Reconstructed Patristic quotations Harnack; Roth Edited form of the Gospel of Luke according to the majority view.
140–170 Anonymous Gospel of Mary Dialogue Gospel Christian Apocrypha Egypt Partial Berlin Codex; Rylands Papyrus 463 Meyer; Elliott Centers on post-resurrection revelations to Mary Magdalene.
140–180 Anonymous Gospel of Thomas Sayings Gospel Christian Apocrypha Syria Complete Nag Hammadi Codex II; Oxyrhynchus papyri Meyer; Patterson & Robinson Collection of 114 sayings attributed to Jesus.
140–180 Valentinian school Gospel of Truth Homily / Gospel Gnostic Literature Rome or Alexandria Complete Nag Hammadi Codex I Meyer; Robinson Often attributed to Valentinus or one of his followers.
140–180 Valentinian school Gospel of Philip Sacramental Treatise Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codex II Meyer; Robinson Collection of mystical sayings concerning sacraments and union with Christ.
145–160 Justin Martyr First Apology Apology Apologetic Rome Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF; Falls Defense of Christianity addressed to Antoninus Pius.
c. 150 Justin Martyr Second Apology Apology Apologetic Rome Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF; Falls Supplement to the First Apology.
150–160 Justin Martyr Dialogue with Trypho Dialogue Apologetic Ephesus or Rome Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF; Falls Lengthy defense of Christianity against Jewish objections.
145–170 Anonymous Acts of John Acts Christian Apocrypha Asia Minor Partial Numerous Greek manuscripts Schneemelcher; Elliott Earliest of the major apocryphal Acts.
150–160 Tatian Address to the Greeks Apology Apologetic Rome Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Critique of Greek philosophy and culture.
160–172 Tatian Diatessaron Gospel Harmony Gospel Harmony Syria Lost (reconstructed) Ephrem's Commentary; Arabic and Latin witnesses Petersen; Hill Earliest known harmony of the four canonical Gospels.
c. 165 Melito of Sardis On Pascha Homily Patristic Sardis Complete Papyrus Chester Beatty-Michigan Hall; ANF (partial) Earliest surviving Christian Paschal homily.
165–180 Melito of Sardis Apology Apology Apologetic Sardis Fragmentary Eusebius Hall Addressed to Emperor Marcus Aurelius.
165–180 Melito of Sardis Extracts (Eklogai) Biblical Commentary Biblical Commentary Sardis Fragmentary Catenae and patristic citations Hall Collection of scriptural interpretations.
165–177 Athenagoras of Athens Plea for the Christians Apology Apologetic Athens (probably) Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Defense of Christians addressed to Marcus Aurelius and Commodus.
c. 177 Athenagoras of Athens On the Resurrection of the Dead Treatise Patristic Athens Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Earliest full-length defense of bodily resurrection.
169–183 Theophilus of Antioch To Autolycus Apology Apologetic Antioch Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF First known Christian author to use the word "Trinity" (Trias).
c. 170 Anonymous Muratorian Fragment Canon List Canonical Literature Rome Fragmentary Codex Ambrosianus Metzger Earliest surviving list of New Testament books.
170–180 Anonymous Letter of the Churches of Lyons and Vienne Martyr Account Martyr Literature Gaul Complete Preserved in Eusebius Musurillo Documents the persecution under Marcus Aurelius.
c. 177 Anonymous Martyrdom of Pionius Martyr Account Martyr Literature Smyrna Complete Medieval manuscripts Musurillo Traditional date disputed by some scholars.
175–185 Anonymous Acts of Paul Acts Christian Apocrypha Asia Minor Partial Coptic, Greek, and Latin witnesses Schneemelcher; Elliott Includes the Acts of Paul and Thecla.
175–190 Anonymous Acts of Paul and Thecla Acts Christian Apocrypha Asia Minor Complete Numerous Greek manuscripts Schneemelcher Most popular section of the Acts of Paul.
175–190 Anonymous Third Epistle to the Corinthians Epistle Christian Apocrypha Asia Minor Complete Armenian and Latin traditions Schneemelcher Incorporated into the Acts of Paul.
175–190 Anonymous Martyrdom of Paul Martyr Account Christian Apocrypha Asia Minor Complete Greek manuscripts Schneemelcher Final section of the Acts of Paul.
175–190 Anonymous Acts of Peter Acts Christian Apocrypha Rome Partial Vercelli Acts; Greek fragments Schneemelcher Contains the Quo Vadis episode.
220–230 Anonymous Acts of Andrew Acts Christian Apocrypha Asia Minor Fragmentary Greek fragments; later recensions Schneemelcher; Elliott One of the major apocryphal apostolic Acts.
c. 178 Celsus The True Doctrine Polemic Pagan Critique Alexandria (probably) Lost (quoted extensively) Preserved by Origen Chadwick Most influential pagan critique of Christianity before Porphyry.
180 Irenaeus of Lyons Against Heresies Anti-heretical Treatise Anti-heretical Proto-orthodox Complete Latin manuscripts; Armenian fragments ANF; Rousseau & Doutreleau Principal refutation of second-century Gnosticism.
c. 180 Irenaeus of Lyons Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching Catechetical Treatise Patristic Lyons Complete Armenian manuscript Behr Summary of Christian doctrine.
180–190 Rhodo Against Marcion Anti-heretical Treatise Anti-heretical Rome Fragmentary Eusebius ANF (fragments) Disciple of Tatian.
c. 190 Clement of Alexandria Exhortation to the Greeks (Protrepticus) Apologetic Treatise Patristic Alexandria Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Invitation for pagans to embrace Christianity.
c. 190 Clement of Alexandria The Instructor (Paedagogus) Moral Treatise Patristic Alexandria Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Christian ethics and daily conduct.
190–202 Clement of Alexandria Miscellanies (Stromata) Theological Miscellany Patristic Alexandria Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF One of the most learned Christian works of the second century.
c. 190 Clement of Alexandria Who Is the Rich Man That Shall Be Saved? Homily Patristic Alexandria Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Commentary on Mark 10:17–31.
c. 197 Tertullian Apology Apology Apologetic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Greatest Latin apology of the early Church.
c. 197 Tertullian To the Nations Apology Apologetic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Earlier companion to the Apology.
c. 197 Tertullian On the Testimony of the Soul Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Appeals to natural knowledge of God.
197–208 Tertullian Against Marcion Anti-heretical Treatise Anti-heretical Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Five-book refutation of Marcionism.
c. 198 Tertullian On Baptism Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Earliest surviving treatise devoted entirely to baptism.
c. 198 Tertullian On Prayer Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Earliest substantial Christian commentary on the Lord's Prayer.
c. 199 Tertullian On Repentance Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Important witness to early penitential practice.
c. 200 Anonymous Acts of Thomas Acts Christian Apocrypha Edessa Complete Syriac and Greek manuscripts Schneemelcher; Elliott Famous for the "Hymn of the Pearl."
c. 200 Anonymous Hymn of the Pearl Hymn Christian Poetry Edessa Complete Embedded in the Acts of Thomas Schneemelcher One of the masterpieces of early Syriac Christian literature.
c. 200 Anonymous Gospel of Judas Dialogue Gospel Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Codex Tchacos Meyer; Kasser Presents Judas as the recipient of secret revelation.
c. 200 Anonymous Apocryphon of John Revelation Dialogue Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codices II, III, IV; Berlin Codex Robinson; Meyer Foundational Gnostic text.
c. 200 Anonymous Hypostasis of the Archons Treatise Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codex II Robinson Interpretation of Genesis from a perspective.
c. 200 Anonymous The Thought of Norea Revelation Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codex IX Robinson Short revelation centered on Norea.
c. 200 Anonymous Thunder, Perfect Mind Poetic Revelation Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codex VI Robinson Famous poetic monologue spoken by a divine female figure.
c. 200 Anonymous Trimorphic Protennoia Revelation Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codex XIII Robinson Closely related to the Apocryphon of John.
c. 200 Anonymous Sophia of Jesus Christ Dialogue Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codex III; Berlin Codex Robinson Dialogue between the risen Christ and his disciples.
c. 200 Anonymous Tripartite Tractate Theological Treatise Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codex I Robinson One of the longest Valentinian theological works.
c. 200 Anonymous Interpretation of Knowledge Treatise Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codex XI Robinson Reflects mature Valentinian ecclesiology.
c. 200 Anonymous Letter of Peter to Philip Epistle Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codex VIII Robinson Expanded apostolic revelation dialogue.
c. 200 Anonymous Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles Acts Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codex VI Robinson Symbolic missionary narrative.
200–203 Clement of Alexandria Excerpts from Theodotus Commentary Patristic Alexandria Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Commentary preserving Valentinian traditions.
200–203 Clement of Alexandria Eclogae Propheticae Commentary Patristic Alexandria Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Notes on biblical interpretation.
200–203 Clement of Alexandria Quis Dives Salvetur? Homily Patristic Alexandria Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Interpretation of the Rich Young Ruler.
c. 200 Minucius Felix Octavius Dialogue Apologetic Rome Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Earliest surviving Christian dialogue in Latin.
200–206 Tertullian On the Prescription of Heretics Anti-heretical Treatise Anti-heretical Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Argues apostolic succession determines authentic doctrine.
c. 202 Tertullian Against Praxeas Anti-heretical Treatise Anti-heretical Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Earliest extensive Latin defense of Trinitarian theology.
c. 203 Anonymous Passion of Perpetua and Felicitas Martyr Account Martyr Literature Carthage Complete Numerous Latin manuscripts Musurillo Includes Perpetua's own prison diary.
c. 203 Tertullian To the Martyrs Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Encouragement for imprisoned confessors.
c. 203 Tertullian On the Crown Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Discusses military service and Christian conscience.
c. 205 Hippolytus of Rome Commentary on Daniel Biblical Commentary Biblical Commentary Rome Complete Greek and Slavonic witnesses ANF Earliest surviving complete Christian biblical commentary.
c. 205 Hippolytus of Rome On Christ and Antichrist Treatise Patristic Rome Complete Greek manuscripts ANF Major early work of Christian eschatology.
205–215 Hippolytus of Rome Apostolic Tradition Church Order Church Order Rome Reconstructed Ethiopic, Latin, Arabic, Sahidic witnesses Stewart; Bradshaw Influential source for early liturgy and ordination rites.
210–220 Hippolytus of Rome Refutation of All Heresies Anti-heretical Treatise Anti-heretical Rome Complete Mount Athos manuscript ANF Valuable source for many otherwise-lost heresies.
c. 212 Tertullian On the Resurrection of the Flesh Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Defense of bodily resurrection.
c. 213 Tertullian On the Soul Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Early Christian anthropology.
c. 215 Origen Exhortation to Martyrdom Treatise Patristic Caesarea Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF; Greer Written during persecution.
c. 215 Origen On Prayer Treatise Patristic Caesarea Complete Medieval manuscripts Greer One of the finest early Christian works on prayer.
c. 220 Origen On First Principles (De Principiis) Systematic Theology Patristic Alexandria Partial Latin translation of Rufinus Butterworth First systematic theology in Christian history.
220–230 Origen of Alexandria Commentary on John Biblical Commentary Biblical Commentary Alexandria Fragmentary Greek fragments; Latin translation by Rufinus ANF; Heine One of the earliest extensive Christian commentaries on the Fourth Gospel.
220–230 Origen of Alexandria Commentary on Matthew Biblical Commentary Biblical Commentary Alexandria Fragmentary Greek fragments ANF; Scheck Important witness to early Gospel interpretation.
220–230 Origen of Alexandria Commentary on Romans Biblical Commentary Biblical Commentary Alexandria Partial Rufinus translation ANF Earliest surviving major commentary on Romans.
220–230 Origen of Alexandria Commentary on Genesis Biblical Commentary Biblical Commentary Alexandria Fragmentary Patristic quotations Heine Demonstrates Origen's allegorical interpretation.
220–230 Origen of Alexandria Homilies on Genesis Homily Patristic Alexandria Partial Rufinus translation ANF Early example of Christian preaching on Scripture.
220–230 Origen of Alexandria Homilies on Exodus Homily Patristic Alexandria Partial Rufinus translation ANF Develops typological readings of Exodus.
220–230 Origen of Alexandria Homilies on Leviticus Homily Patristic Alexandria Partial Rufinus translation ANF Influential on later sacramental theology.
220–230 Origen of Alexandria Hexapla Biblical Textual Criticism Biblical Scholarship Caesarea Fragmentary Fragments preserved in later writers Field; Nautin Monumental six-column edition of the Old Testament.
c. 220 Julius Africanus Chronographiai Chronology / History Patristic Palestine Fragmentary Preserved in Eusebius and later writers Wallraff One of the earliest Christian chronological histories.
c. 220 Julius Africanus Letter to Aristides Letter / Gospel Harmonization Patristic Palestine Fragmentary Preserved in Eusebius ANF Discusses apparent differences between Matthew and Luke.
220–230 Anonymous Acts of Andrew Acts Christian Apocrypha Asia Minor Fragmentary Greek fragments; later recensions Schneemelcher; Elliott One of the major apocryphal apostolic Acts.
220–240 Anonymous Acts of Peter and Andrew Acts Christian Apocrypha Egypt or Asia Minor Fragmentary Greek manuscripts Schneemelcher Part of the broader Acts tradition.
c. 230 Anonymous Gospel of Bartholomew Gospel / Revelation Dialogue Christian Apocrypha Egypt Fragmentary Greek and Coptic manuscripts Elliott Contains dialogues between Christ and Bartholomew.
c. 230 Anonymous Questions of Bartholomew Revelation Dialogue Christian Apocrypha Egypt Fragmentary Greek and Coptic manuscripts Elliott Explores post-resurrection revelations.
c. 230 Anonymous Apocalypse of Adam Apocalypse Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codex V Robinson reinterpretation of salvation history.
c. 230 Anonymous Zostrianos Revelation Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codex VIII Robinson Long cosmological revelation.
c. 230 Anonymous Allogenes Revelation Dialogue Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codex XI Robinson Describes ascent through heavenly realms.
c. 230 Anonymous Marsanes Revelation Treatise Gnostic Literature Egypt Complete Nag Hammadi Codex X Robinson Mystical cosmological work.
235–240 Novatian of Rome On the Trinity Theological Treatise Patristic Rome Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Earliest surviving Latin treatise devoted to the Trinity.
235–250 Novatian of Rome On Jewish Foods Treatise Biblical Interpretation Rome Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Allegorical interpretation of Jewish dietary laws.
235–250 Novatian of Rome Letters Letters Patristic Rome Fragmentary Cyprian and later writers ANF Important evidence for Roman church disputes.
240–250 Cyprian of Carthage To Donatus Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Cyprian's conversion narrative.
246 Cyprian of Carthage The Dress of Virgins Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Discusses Christian ascetic ideals.
248 Cyprian of Carthage The Unity of the Church Ecclesiology Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Major early statement on episcopal unity.
249 Cyprian of Carthage On the Lapsed Pastoral Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Addresses Christians who sacrificed during persecution.
249 Cyprian of Carthage On the Lord's Prayer Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Early Latin commentary on the Lord's Prayer.
c. 250 Anonymous Didascalia Apostolorum Church Order Church Order Syria Complete Syriac manuscripts Connolly; Funk Important source for third-century church practice.
c. 250 Anonymous Acts of the Scillitan Martyrs Martyr Account Martyr Literature North Africa Complete Greek manuscripts Musurillo Earliest surviving Latin martyr act.
c. 250 Anonymous Martyrdom of Pionius Martyr Account Martyr Literature Smyrna Complete Greek manuscripts Musurillo Describes persecution under Decius or earlier.
c. 250 Anonymous Testament of Jesus Christ Church Order / Revelation Christian Pseudepigrapha Egypt Complete Greek manuscripts Tübingen editions Presents apostolic instructions attributed to Jesus.
c. 250 Anonymous Acts of Xanthippe and Polyxena Acts Christian Apocrypha Spain (traditional) Complete Greek manuscripts Elliott Late apocryphal Acts tradition.
c. 250 Anonymous Acts of Philip Acts Christian Apocrypha Asia Minor Fragmentary Greek manuscripts Schneemelcher Contains extensive miracle narratives.
250–251 Cyprian of Carthage Letters Letters Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF; Diercks One of the most important collections of third-century Christian correspondence.
250–251 Cyprian of Carthage To Demetrian Apologetic Treatise Apologetic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Responds to pagan accusations that Christians caused disasters.
251 Cyprian of Carthage On the Mortality Pastoral Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Reflection on Christian responses to plague and death.
251 Cyprian of Carthage On Works and Almsgiving Moral Treatise Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Discusses charity and repentance.
251–258 Cyprian of Carthage Letters concerning the Novatian Schism Ecclesiastical Letters Patristic Carthage Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF; Diercks Major evidence for early debates over church unity and restoration of the lapsed.
c. 251 Novatian On the Jewish Foods Biblical Treatise Patristic Rome Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Allegorical interpretation of Mosaic food laws.
c. 251 Novatian On the Trinity Theological Treatise Patristic Rome Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF One of the earliest Latin works defending Trinitarian theology.
c. 251 Novatian On the Spectacles Moral Treatise Patristic Rome Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Argues Christians should avoid pagan entertainment.
251–260 Dionysius of Alexandria Letters Letters Patristic Alexandria Fragmentary Eusebius and later writers ANF Important witness to third-century theological controversies.
c. 252 Anonymous Acts of Cyprian Martyr Account Martyr Literature Carthage Complete Latin manuscripts Musurillo Earliest surviving account of an African bishop's martyrdom.


252–260 Dionysius of Alexandria Against Nepos Anti-millennialist Treatise Anti-heretical Alexandria Fragmentary Eusebius ANF fragments Refutes excessive literal millennial interpretations.
c. 255 Anonymous Acts of Marianus and James Martyr Account Martyr Literature North Africa Complete Greek manuscripts Musurillo Important witness to persecution under Valerian.
c. 255 Anonymous Passion of Montanus, Lucius, and Others Martyr Account Martyr Literature North Africa Complete Greek manuscripts Musurillo Describes Montanist-associated martyrs.
c. 255 Anonymous Acts of Euplus Martyr Account Martyr Literature Sicily Complete Greek manuscripts Musurillo Valerian persecution martyrdom account.
260–270 Gregory Thaumaturgus Address of Thanks to Origen Oration Patristic Palestine Complete Greek manuscripts ANF Important account of Origen's teaching.
c. 260 Gregory Thaumaturgus Canonical Letter Ecclesiastical Letter Patristic Neocaesarea Complete Greek manuscripts ANF Early evidence of church disciplinary practice.
260–280 Anonymous Acts of Peter and Paul Acts Christian Apocrypha Asia Minor or Egypt Complete Greek manuscripts Elliott Combines traditions concerning Peter and Paul.
c. 270 Victorinus of Pettau Commentary on Revelation Biblical Commentary Biblical Commentary Pannonia Complete Medieval manuscripts ANF Earliest surviving Latin commentary on Revelation.
c. 270 Victorinus of Pettau Commentary on Genesis Biblical Commentary Biblical Commentary Pannonia Fragmentary Patristic quotations ANF Early Latin biblical interpretation.
c. 270 Victorinus of Pettau Against the Heresies Anti-heretical Treatise Anti-heretical Pannonia Lost Fragments only ANF One of the earliest Latin anti-heretical works.
c. 270–280 Methodius of Olympus Symposium Dialogue Patristic Lycia Complete Greek manuscripts ANF Christian adaptation of Plato's Symposium focusing on virginity.
c. 270–280 Methodius of Olympus On Free Will Theological Treatise Patristic Lycia Fragmentary Patristic quotations ANF Response to determinism.
c. 270–280 Methodius of Olympus On the Resurrection Theological Treatise Patristic Lycia Fragmentary Patristic quotations ANF Defense of bodily resurrection.
c. 280 Anonymous Apostolic Church Order Church Order Church Order Egypt or Syria Complete Greek manuscripts Funk Early compilation of apostolic regulations.
c. 280 Anonymous Pseudo-Clementine Homilies Religious Romance / Dialogue Christian Pseudepigrapha Syria Complete Greek manuscripts Rehm; Jones Presents Peter as defender of true Christianity against Simon Magus.
c. 280 Anonymous Pseudo-Clementine Recognitions Religious Romance / Dialogue Christian Pseudepigrapha Syria Complete Rufinus Latin translation Rehm; Jones Related to the Homilies but preserves different traditions.
c. 280–300 Anonymous Apocalypse of Paul Apocalypse Christian Apocrypha Egypt Complete Numerous medieval manuscripts Elliott Influential vision of heaven and hell.
c. 280–300 Anonymous Apocalypse of Thomas Apocalypse Christian Apocrypha Egypt Complete Latin manuscripts Elliott Eschatological revelations attributed to Thomas.
c. 290 Anonymous Acts of Philip (later sections) Acts Christian Apocrypha Asia Minor Fragmentary Greek manuscripts Schneemelcher Includes extensive miracle traditions.
c. 290 Anonymous Acts of Andrew and Matthias Acts Christian Apocrypha Egypt Fragmentary Greek manuscripts Elliott Late apostolic Acts tradition.
290–300 Anonymous Life of Adam and Eve (Christian expansion) Adamic Literature Christian Pseudepigrapha Mediterranean Complete Numerous manuscripts Johnson Christian adaptation of Jewish Adam traditions.
c. 300 Anonymous Acts of the Apostles Peter and Paul (expanded form) Acts Christian Apocrypha Egypt Complete Greek manuscripts Elliott Expands traditions surrounding apostolic martyrdom.

Why Did God Allow the Great Apostasy to Happen?

A common objection to the doctrine of the Great Apostasy is that if God knew His Church would fall into apostasy, why would He allow it to happen? Why would God permit centuries of confusion and the loss of priesthood authority, revelation, and ordinances? Latter-day Saint theology answers that God does not force humanity to accept truth. Because agency is essential to God’s plan, He allows individuals and communities to choose whether they will accept or reject the light He offers.

The scriptures repeatedly show that God permits His children to exercise agency, even when those choices lead to spiritual consequences. The Lord declared, “Behold, here is the agency of man, and here is the condemnation of man; because that which was from the beginning is plainly manifest unto them, and they receive not the light” (Doctrine and Covenants 93:31).

Likewise, the Book of Mormon teaches that God “gave unto them that they should be agents unto themselves” (Doctrine and Covenants 101:78; see also 2 Nephi 2:16). Without the possibility of rejecting truth, there could be no meaningful exercise of faith, obedience, or repentance.

The Bible itself describes periods in which God’s people fell away from revealed truth. Ancient Israel repeatedly experienced cycles of revelation, apostasy, judgment, and restoration. The book of Judges describes how “every man did that which was right in his own eyes” (Judges 21:25) after turning away from God’s covenant. The prophets repeatedly warned Israel that rejecting God’s word would lead to the loss of greater light: “Therefore my people are gone into captivity, because they have no knowledge” (Isaiah 5:13).

These patterns demonstrate that God allowing apostasy is not unique to Christianity’s history. Rather, it reflects a recurring pattern in which God honors human agency while continuing to prepare a way for restoration.

The New Testament anticipated that a falling away would occur after the time of Christ and His apostles. Paul warned the Ephesian elders: “For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock” (Acts 20:29).

These passages suggest that God did not allow the Apostasy because He was surprised by it. Rather, the scriptures indicate that God knew such a falling away would occur and prepared for its eventual restoration.

The Doctrine and Covenants uses the parable of the wheat and the tares to describe this process. The Lord explained that after the apostles died, the adversary would sow corruption among the followers of Christ: “After they have fallen asleep the great persecutor of the church, the apostate, the whore, even Babylon… soweth the tares” (Doctrine and Covenants 86:3).

However, this revelation also teaches that God preserved a faithful remnant and that the loss of the fulness of the gospel would not be permanent. The Lord declared that the wheat and the tares would grow together until the time of the harvest (Doctrine and Covenants 86:7–10). The purpose of the Restoration was therefore not to recover a completely extinguished faith, but to restore the fulness of the gospel and gather God’s covenant people in preparation for the final harvest.

The Great Apostasy also served to demonstrate the need for the Restoration. The loss of priesthood authority, prophetic revelation, and saving ordinances showed that Christ’s Church could not be maintained solely through human effort. The Restoration was therefore not merely a reform movement but a divine renewal of authority and covenant. As the Lord declared, “The works, and the designs, and the purposes of God cannot be frustrated, neither can they come to nought” (Doctrine and Covenants 3:1).

God’s purposes continued even during the Apostasy. Just as the Lord preserved a faithful remnant of Israel despite periods of rebellion, He preserved truth and prepared the way for the Restoration. The Book of Mormon teaches that the Lord’s work continues despite opposition: “He doeth not anything save it be for the benefit of the world; for he loveth the world” (2 Nephi 26:24).

Thus, the Great Apostasy was not a failure of God’s plan. It was a consequence of human agency, a fulfillment of scriptural prophecy, and part of the larger pattern of apostasy and restoration found throughout God’s dealings with His children. God allowed the loss of the fulness of the gospel because He permits His children to choose, but He also prepared from the beginning to restore the authority, covenants, and ordinances necessary for the salvation of all humanity.

Why 1820?

One of the most natural questions a person can ask about the Restoration is why it took so long. If the priesthood authority and many "plain and precious" truths were lost following the deaths of the Apostles, why would God wait nearly eighteen centuries before restoring them? Why not restore the gospel in the fourth century, the eighth century, or during the Protestant Reformation? Latter-day Saint doctrine does not provide a complete answer to those questions. The Lord has never revealed every reason for His timing. Nevertheless, scripture, history, and the teachings of modern prophets together suggest a compelling cumulative explanation. While they may not demonstrate that the Restoration had to occur in 1820, they help us understand why that moment in history was uniquely fitting.

The Restoration was not simply a correction of a few theological errors. It inaugurated what Latter-day Saints call the "dispensation of the fulness of times" (Ephesians 1:10; Doctrine and Covenants 128:18), the final dispensation before the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. God was not merely restoring doctrines. He was restoring priesthood authority, bringing forth new scripture, revealing temple ordinances, gathering Israel on both sides of the veil, and establishing a Church intended to endure until Christ's return. Such a work required more than a willing prophet. It required a world that had been prepared to receive, preserve, and spread the Restoration. Throughout scripture, God often accomplishes His purposes by patiently preparing both people and circumstances over generations rather than by overriding history altogether. The Restoration appears to follow that same pattern.

History itself points toward the nineteenth century as an unusually favorable moment. For much of Christian history, governments treated religious dissent as both a theological and civil offense. New religious movements were often suppressed before they could take root. By Joseph Smith's day, however, the United States offered something unprecedented: constitutional protections for religious liberty, a population with high literacy rates, inexpensive printing, and a culture that encouraged religious inquiry. The Book of Mormon could be printed and distributed on a scale that would have been impossible centuries earlier. Missionaries could travel with increasing ease, and advances in communication and transportation would soon allow the restored gospel to spread throughout the world. The political, technological, and social conditions necessary for a permanent restoration had begun to converge.

Those developments did not emerge in isolation. From a Latter-day Saint perspective, centuries of Christian reform also helped prepare the way. Men and women such as John Wycliffe, William Tyndale, Martin Luther, John Calvin, and John Wesley challenged religious corruption, translated the scriptures into the language of ordinary people, emphasized personal engagement with the Bible, and encouraged believers to seek a purer form of Christianity. Although Latter-day Saints believe these reformers did not restore priesthood authority or the fulness of the gospel, they nevertheless helped create a world increasingly receptive to the idea that God might yet do more. In that sense, the Reformation was not the Restoration itself, but an important step toward it.

The Book of Mormon adds another dimension to this picture. In 1 Nephi 13, Nephi foresaw that many "plain and precious" truths would be removed from the gospel as it passed through history. Whether through deliberate corruption, sincere misunderstanding, or simply the accumulation of centuries of tradition, religious institutions naturally develop a powerful inertia. Once a particular way of reading scripture becomes deeply established, even faithful believers often find it difficult to imagine that foundational assumptions could be mistaken. The Restoration therefore required more than correcting isolated doctrines. It required someone willing to ask whether prevailing religious narratives themselves were incomplete. Joseph Smith's First Vision began with precisely that kind of question. Rather than asking which denomination was the best expression of Christianity, he sought to know which church God Himself recognized. His willingness to seek revelation rather than rely solely upon inherited tradition distinguished him from many of his contemporaries.

Latter-day Saints also believe that Joseph Smith was prepared for this work long before his birth. Scripture teaches that certain individuals were foreordained in the premortal life for sacred missions (Abraham 3:22–23), and Lehi identified Joseph Smith as the "choice seer" prophesied centuries earlier by Joseph of Egypt (2 Nephi 3). Although the reasons for Joseph's foreordination have not been fully revealed, it is reasonable within Latter-day Saint theology to conclude that he had demonstrated exceptional faithfulness before mortality and had been divinely prepared for this calling. His mortal life likewise displayed qualities the Restoration demanded: humility before God, openness to continuing revelation, remarkable resilience under persecution, and an extraordinary capacity to receive, organize, and teach new revelation. If God had spent centuries preparing the world for the Restoration, it is fitting that He would also prepare the prophet through whom that Restoration would come.

Taken together, these considerations form a persuasive cumulative case. God prepared nations through political and legal developments that protected religious liberty. He prepared societies through centuries of reform that rekindled a desire for scriptural truth. He prepared the world through advances in literacy, printing, communication, and transportation that would enable the restored gospel to endure and spread. He prepared a prophet who was foreordained, spiritually receptive, and willing to ask questions that others would not. Each consideration, standing alone, explains only part of the picture. Together, however, they paint a coherent portrait of divine providence unfolding over many centuries.

Even so, it is important not to claim more than the evidence allows. This cumulative case does not prove that 1820 was the only possible time for the Restoration or that Joseph Smith was the only person whom God could have called. Latter-day Saint scripture does not reveal every reason for God's choices, and finite beings should be cautious about claiming insight into every aspect of divine providence. The purpose of these arguments is not to demonstrate necessity but to show fittingness. They explain why the timing of the Restoration makes sense within the broader sweep of sacred history.

Ultimately, Christians already accept this kind of reasoning in many other contexts. Scripture says that Christ came "in the fulness of time" (Galatians 4:4), yet it does not explain why the Incarnation occurred in the first century rather than earlier or later. God waited centuries before delivering Israel from Egypt, generations before sending the Flood, and days before raising Lazarus. In each case, believers can identify reasons that illuminate God's timing without claiming to exhaust His purposes. The Restoration invites the same posture. Latter-day Saints can reasonably conclude that God inaugurated the Restoration when the world had been sufficiently prepared and through the prophet He had long prepared for that work. Beyond that, faith does not require complete knowledge of every divine reason. It requires confidence that the God who patiently guided history toward the Restoration knew precisely when its fulness of times had arrived.

Did God Abandon the World During the Great Apostasy?

A common objection to the doctrine of the Great Apostasy is that if the Church of Jesus Christ disappeared from the earth, then God must have left humanity without divine guidance for centuries. Latter-day Saint theology rejects this conclusion. The Apostasy describes the loss of the authorized Church and its fulness of ordinances, not the absence of God’s influence, inspiration, or concern for His children.

The scriptures teach that God’s light continues to reach all people. The Doctrine and Covenants teaches that “the Spirit giveth light to every man that cometh into the world” (Doctrine and Covenants 84:46), and the Gospel of John similarly states that Christ is “the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world” (John 1:9). Even without the fulness of revealed truth, individuals could still receive inspiration, seek righteousness, and act according to the knowledge they possessed.

The Book of Mormon teaches that God remembers and works with His children even when they lack complete knowledge. Alma taught that God “imparteth his words unto the children of men, yea, over all the face of the earth” (Alma 29:8). Likewise, Nephi taught that God “loveth his children” and provides opportunities for them to receive truth according to His wisdom (1 Nephi 10:17).

The Great Apostasy was therefore not a period in which God withdrew His love or ceased His work among humanity. Rather, it was a period in which the authorized means for receiving the fulness of the gospel—such as priesthood authority, prophetic revelation, and saving ordinances—were no longer fully available on the earth. God continued to guide individuals through conscience, inspiration, scripture, and the light of Christ while preparing the way for the Restoration.

The Restoration of the gospel through Joseph Smith was not a correction to a period of divine abandonment, but the continuation of God’s ongoing work to bless His children. Through the Restoration, God restored the authority, covenants, and ordinances necessary to bring the fulness of the gospel back to the earth and extend its blessings to all people.

The Fate of Those Living During the Great Apostasy

A common objection to the doctrine of the Great Apostasy is that if the fulness of the gospel and priesthood authority were lost from the earth, many people must have lived and died without access to essential truths and ordinances. Latter-day Saint doctrine teaches that God’s plan accounts for this circumstance through the preaching of the gospel to the dead and the performance of ordinances on their behalf.

The Book of Mormon teaches that individuals are not condemned for lacking a law or knowledge they never received: “Where there is no law given there is no punishment; and where there is no punishment there is no condemnation” (2 Nephi 9:25). Similarly, Doctrine and Covenants 137:7 teaches that “all who have died without a knowledge of this gospel, who would have received it if they had been permitted to tarry, shall be heirs of the celestial kingdom of God.”

The New Testament teaches that the gospel is preached to those who have died: “For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead” (1 Peter 4:6). Modern revelation further explains that those who did not receive the gospel during mortality have the opportunity to accept it in the spirit world and receive its blessings through obedience to the ordinances of God’s house (Doctrine and Covenants 138:58).

The Great Apostasy refers to the loss of priesthood authority, revelation, and the fulness of gospel ordinances from the earth; it does not mean that God abandoned His children or that every person who lived during that period was personally rejected by God. Individuals could still receive light, follow Christ according to the understanding available to them, and be judged according to their faithfulness.

The Restoration restored the ordinances and authority necessary for the salvation of all God’s children, including those who lived during periods when the fulness of the gospel was unavailable. Through Christ’s Atonement, missionary work in the spirit world, and temple ordinances performed on behalf of the dead, God provides every person with a fair opportunity to accept or reject the gospel.

How Would We Know Whether the Church is in Apostasy Today?

Latter-day Saints believe that the Church will never fall into generalized apostasy like the early Church. This is based on several scriptures.

Some might ask how we might know whether the Church is in apostasy. What is more, these critics might ask how we can believe the Church is not in apostasy when it has strayed from some teachings that are clearly scriptural.

The answer to this question is that the Church has not strayed from essential teachings like the early Christians did.

Notes (click to expand)
  1. Nicholas J. Frederick and Joseph M. Spencer, “Remnant or Replacement? Outlining a Possible Apostasy Narrative,” BYU Studies Quarterly 60, no. 1 (2021): 106; compare Miranda Wilcox, “Narrating Religious Heritage: Apostasy and Restoration,” BYU Studies Quarterly 60, no. 3 (2021): 227. For more on these scholars' views, see the summary in John Gee, "Ten Views on the Falling Away," BYU Studies Quarterly 63, no. 2 (2024): 157–60.
  2. Kent P. Jackson, From Apostasy to Restoration (Deseret Book, 1996), 6.
  3. General Handbook: Serving in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, “32.6.3.2 Apostasy,” The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed July 17, 2026, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/general-handbook/32-repentance-and-membership-councils#sec17.
  4. W.D. Davis and Dale C. Allison, Matthew: A Shorter Commentary (T&T Clark International, 2004), 270–71, emphasis in original; quoted in Robert S. Boylan, After the Order of the Son of God: The Biblical and Historical Evidence for Latter-day Saint Theology of the Priesthood (CreateSpace, 2018), 121–22. See also Oscar Cullmann, Peter: Disciple, Apostle, Martyr (SCM Press, 1953), 204–5; quoted in Boylan, After the Order, 122. Finally, see Craig S. Keener, IVP Bible Background Commentary New Testament (Intervarsity Press, 1993), 90; quoted in Boylan, After the Order, 122.
  5. Daniel Becerra, "The Canonization of the New Testament," in New Testament History, Culture, and Society: A Background to the Texts of the New Testament, ed. Lincoln H. Blumell (Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University; Deseret Book, 2019), 780.
  6. Lothar Coenen, "Church," in The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, ed. Colin Brown (Zondervan, 1981), 298.
  7. Ernest Best, "Church," in Harper Collins Bible Dictionary, ed. Mark Allan Powell (HarperCollins, 1989), 135.
  8. Gilbert W. Scharffs, Missionary's Little Book of Answers (Covenant Communications, 2002), 185.
  9. Daniel C. Peterson and Stephen D. Ricks, Offenders for a Word: How Anti-Mormons Play Word Games to Attack the Latter-day Saints (FARMS, 1992), 40–41.
  10. Noel B. Reynolds, "Appendix C: New Testament Evidences and Prophecies of Apostasy in the First-Century Church," in Early Christians in Disarray: Contemporary LDS Perspectives on the Apostasy, ed. Noel B. Reynolds (FARMS, 2005), 355–69.
  11. Kent P. Jackson, "New Testament Prophecies of Apostasy," in Learn of Me: History and Teachings of the New Testament, ed. John Hilton III and Nicholas J. Frederick (Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University; Deseret Book, 2022), 375–90.
  12. Kurt Manwaring, "Fact vs. Fiction: How Did All the Apostles Die?" From the Desk, July 4, 2026, https://fromthedesk.org/how-did-all-the-apostles-die/.
  13. Mark L. McConkie, "Translated Beings," in Encyclopedia of Mormonism, ed. Daniel H. Ludlow, 6 vols. (MacMillan Publishing, 1992), 4:1485.
  14. James N. Hubler, Creatio ex Nihilo: Matter, Creation, and the Body in Classical and Christian Philosophy through Aquinas (University of Pennsylvania, 1995), 102.
  15. Frederick and Spencer, "Remnant or Replacement," 105–27.
  16. John Gee, "The Corruption of Scripture in Early Christianity," in Early Christians in Disarray: Contemporary LDS Perspectives on the Christian Apostasy, ed. Noel B. Reynolds (FARMS, 2005), 163–204.