Template:CriticalWork:Southerton:Losing:Repeat:Apologists not official - Revision history

RogerNicholson at 16:42, 26 November 2016

2016-11-26T16:42:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 26 November 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* The author wishes to discredit anything he labels "apologetic" (i.e., any work that might contest his naive and ill-informed reading of LDS scripture). He does not engage their arguments, but uses a variety of tactics to avoid or dismiss them.		{{appeal to emotion\|The author wishes to discredit anything he labels "apologetic" (i.e., any work that might contest his naive and ill-informed reading of LDS scripture). He does not engage their arguments, but uses a variety of tactics to avoid or dismiss them. The author sometimes claims that "apologetic" answers are not endorsed or promoted by the Church (allowing him to suggest that either such answers don't count because they aren't "official," or such answers are radical and therefore ultimately unacceptable—and the Church knows it.
	* The author sometimes claims that "apologetic" answers are not endorsed or promoted by the Church (allowing him to suggest that either such answers don't count because they aren't "official," or such answers are radical and therefore ultimately unacceptable—and the Church knows it.
	* {{Repeat\|l1=185-186\|l2=202\|l3=205\|#185-186\|#202b\|#205}}		Yet, the author ''knows'' that this claim is false, since he cites Jeff Lindsay on [[#185-186\|p. 185-186]]. Lindsay is an "apologist," and his work is cited by the Church's official website. There are also [[Apologetics#Does_the_Church_employ_or_pay_LDS_apologists.3F\|other examples]] of the Church using "apologetic" responses in a formal way.
	* Yet, the author ''knows'' that this claim is false, since he cites Jeff Lindsay on [[#185-186\|p. 185-186]]. Lindsay is an "apologist," and his work is cited by the Church's official website.		{{Repeat\|l1=185-186\|l2=202\|l3=205\|#185-186\|#202b\|#205}}
	* There are also [[Apologetics#Does_the_Church_employ_or_pay_LDS_apologists.3F\|other examples]] of the Church using "apologetic" responses in a formal way.		}}
	* [[Apologetics]]<noinclude>
	~~[[fr:Modèle:CriticalWork:Southerton:Losing:~~Repeat~~:Apologists not official]]~~
	~~</noinclude>~~

GregSmith: robot Adding: fr:Modèle:CriticalWork:Southerton:Losing:Repeat:Apologists not official

2010-05-03T18:52:04Z

robot Adding: fr:Modèle:CriticalWork:Southerton:Losing:Repeat:Apologists not official

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, 3 May 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* Yet, the author ''knows'' that this claim is false, since he cites Jeff Lindsay on [[#185-186\|p. 185-186]]. Lindsay is an "apologist," and his work is cited by the Church's official website.		* Yet, the author ''knows'' that this claim is false, since he cites Jeff Lindsay on [[#185-186\|p. 185-186]]. Lindsay is an "apologist," and his work is cited by the Church's official website.
	* There are also [[Apologetics#Does_the_Church_employ_or_pay_LDS_apologists.3F\|other examples]] of the Church using "apologetic" responses in a formal way.		* There are also [[Apologetics#Does_the_Church_employ_or_pay_LDS_apologists.3F\|other examples]] of the Church using "apologetic" responses in a formal way.
	* [[Apologetics]]		* [[Apologetics]]<noinclude>
			[[fr:Modèle:CriticalWork:Southerton:Losing:Repeat:Apologists not official]]
			</noinclude>

GregSmith at 05:14, 4 July 2009

2009-07-04T05:14:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:14, 4 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* The author wishes to discredit anything he labels "apologetic" (i.e., any work that might contest his naive and ill-informed reading of LDS scripture). He does not engage their arguments, but uses a variety of tactics to avoid or dismiss them.		* The author wishes to discredit anything he labels "apologetic" (i.e., any work that might contest his naive and ill-informed reading of LDS scripture). He does not engage their arguments, but uses a variety of tactics to avoid or dismiss them.
	* The author sometimes claims that "apologetic" answers are not endorsed or promoted by the Church (allowing him to suggest that either such answers don't count because they aren't "official," or such answers are radical and therefore ultimately unacceptable—and the Church knows it.		* The author sometimes claims that "apologetic" answers are not endorsed or promoted by the Church (allowing him to suggest that either such answers don't count because they aren't "official," or such answers are radical and therefore ultimately unacceptable—and the Church knows it.
	* {{Repeat\|l1=185-186\|l2=202\|l3=205\|#185-186\|#~~202~~\|#205}}		* {{Repeat\|l1=185-186\|l2=202\|l3=205\|#185-186\|#202b\|#205}}
	* Yet, the author ''knows'' that this claim is false, since he cites Jeff Lindsay on [[#185-186\|p. 185-186]]. Lindsay is an "apologist," and his work is cited by the Church's official website.		* Yet, the author ''knows'' that this claim is false, since he cites Jeff Lindsay on [[#185-186\|p. 185-186]]. Lindsay is an "apologist," and his work is cited by the Church's official website.
	* There are also [[Apologetics#Does_the_Church_employ_or_pay_LDS_apologists.3F\|other examples]] of the Church using "apologetic" responses in a formal way.		* There are also [[Apologetics#Does_the_Church_employ_or_pay_LDS_apologists.3F\|other examples]] of the Church using "apologetic" responses in a formal way.
	* [[Apologetics]]		* [[Apologetics]]

GregSmith: Created page with '* The author wishes to discredit anything he labels "apologetic" (i.e., any work that might contest his naive and ill-informed reading of LDS scripture). He does not engage thei…'

2009-07-04T05:12:25Z

Created page with '* The author wishes to discredit anything he labels "apologetic" (i.e., any work that might contest his naive and ill-informed reading of LDS scripture). He does not engage thei…'

New page

* The author wishes to discredit anything he labels "apologetic" (i.e., any work that might contest his naive and ill-informed reading of LDS scripture). He does not engage their arguments, but uses a variety of tactics to avoid or dismiss them.
* The author sometimes claims that "apologetic" answers are not endorsed or promoted by the Church (allowing him to suggest that either such answers don't count because they aren't "official," or such answers are radical and therefore ultimately unacceptable—and the Church knows it.
* {{Repeat|l1=185-186|l2=202|l3=205|#185-186|#202|#205}}
* Yet, the author ''knows'' that this claim is false, since he cites Jeff Lindsay on [[#185-186|p. 185-186]]. Lindsay is an "apologist," and his work is cited by the Church's official website.
* There are also [[Apologetics#Does_the_Church_employ_or_pay_LDS_apologists.3F|other examples]] of the Church using "apologetic" responses in a formal way.
* [[Apologetics]]