Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Mormonism 101/Chapter 18 - Revision history

GregSmith: /* top */Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}}

2024-04-13T20:13:54Z

top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 13 April 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~FairMormon~~}}		{{Main Page}}
	{{H1		{{H1
	\|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Mormonism 101/Chapter 18		\|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Mormonism 101/Chapter 18

GregSmith: bot - LDS replace where able, replaced: LDS Church → Church (3)

2024-04-13T02:01:21Z

bot - LDS replace where able, replaced: LDS Church → Church (3)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:01, 13 April 2024
Line 127:		Line 127:
	First of all, let us state unequivocally that this is pure dishonesty. This is an intentional attempt to deceive people who don't know any better. As anyone who has studied The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints would know (and the authors tout themselves as "experts"), the Sunstone Symposium is NOT a Church-sponsored symposium…it is far from it. The Sunstone Symposium is held every year by the Sunstone Foundation and provides a forum where a variety of topics among Sunstone subscribers (these include dissident LDS members, excommunicated LDS members, current LDS members, atheists, humanists, etc.) are discussed.		First of all, let us state unequivocally that this is pure dishonesty. This is an intentional attempt to deceive people who don't know any better. As anyone who has studied The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints would know (and the authors tout themselves as "experts"), the Sunstone Symposium is NOT a Church-sponsored symposium…it is far from it. The Sunstone Symposium is held every year by the Sunstone Foundation and provides a forum where a variety of topics among Sunstone subscribers (these include dissident LDS members, excommunicated LDS members, current LDS members, atheists, humanists, etc.) are discussed.

	Let us look to the Deseret News, a local Salt Lake City newspaper owned by the ~~LDS~~ Church, an interview with Sunstone's chairman of the board of directors, J.F. "Toby" Pingree:		Let us look to the ''Deseret News'', a local Salt Lake City newspaper owned by the Church, which contains an interview with Sunstone's chairman of the board of directors, J.F. "Toby" Pingree:
	<blockquote>		<blockquote>
	Although the symposium and journal have made headlines in the past for its open discussion of topics such as feminism and dissident members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Pingree said he doesn't think Sunstone is "on the church's radar screen" right now. "But I think there's even more of a need for (the symposium and journal)," he said, "because BYU is even more restrictive now." According to Pingree, "the faculty at BYU have been led to understand that they shouldn't be participating in Sunstone."<ref>Elaine Jarvik, "Sunstone Publisher Resigns," ''Deseret News'' (13 June 13 2001), B2.</ref>		Although the symposium and journal have made headlines in the past for its open discussion of topics such as feminism and dissident members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Pingree said he doesn't think Sunstone is "on the church's radar screen" right now. "But I think there's even more of a need for (the symposium and journal)," he said, "because BYU is even more restrictive now." According to Pingree, "the faculty at BYU have been led to understand that they shouldn't be participating in Sunstone."<ref>Elaine Jarvik, "Sunstone Publisher Resigns," ''Deseret News'' (13 June 13 2001), B2.</ref>
Line 153:		Line 153:
	Perhaps Peter would rather those from Jerusalem, in the second chapter of Acts, have questioned his words and his command to repent and be baptized. Perhaps, in some statement that we no longer have, Paul advised the Romans, Corinthians and others not to trust his words. "Do not study my words," he must have suggested, "and do not refer to them often. In fact, throw them away."		Perhaps Peter would rather those from Jerusalem, in the second chapter of Acts, have questioned his words and his command to repent and be baptized. Perhaps, in some statement that we no longer have, Paul advised the Romans, Corinthians and others not to trust his words. "Do not study my words," he must have suggested, "and do not refer to them often. In fact, throw them away."

	Yet this is what the authors would have the leaders of the ~~LDS~~ Church advise its members, for it is the only alternative to advising the members to study, take heed, and follow their teachings.		Yet this is what the authors would have the leaders of the Church advise its members, for it is the only alternative to advising the members to study, take heed, and follow their teachings.
	}}		}}

Line 324:		Line 324:
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>

	Interestingly, another writer in the same volume in which Pinnock's article appeared, Fritz Guy, also refers to the "paradigm shift" which occurred in his own study.<ref>Fritz Guy, "The Universality of God's Love," in ''The Grace of God and the Will of Man'', edited by Clark Pinnock (Minneapolis, Minnesota: Bethany House Publishers, 1989), 35. Could this 'paradigm shift,' which necessitates a re-reading of the Bible, which then results in a new understanding of the Bible, be anything like that which the First Presidency of the ~~LDS~~ Church wrote in their Christmas Message of 1910: "Men must be susceptible to truth in order to receive truth." [{{Book:Clark:Messages of the First Presidency 4\|pages=220}}] To receive new light one must first rid oneself of the old darkness. Compare also Crawford Knox, ''Changing Christian Paradigms and their Implications for Modern Thought'' (Leiden, Netherlands: E.J. Brill, 1993).</ref> The fifth change Pinnock found necessary was "the atoning work of Christ. The easy part was accepting the obvious fact that contrary to Calvinian logic Jesus died for the sins of the whole world according to the New Testament." He began by asking where the element of human response fit into the new theme. He first concluded "if Christ really took away the guilt of the sins of the race, is the whole race then not now justified by virtue of that fact?" Unfortunately, he decided that was 'too' universalistic for him. "Christ's death on behalf of the race evidently did not automatically secure for anyone an actual reconciled relationship with God, but made it possible for people to enter into such a relationship by faith."<ref name = "pinnock"></ref>{{Rp\|22-23}} <ref>The last line is a theme that runs throughout the papers in the volume edited by Pinnock, and is consistent with the LDS position: Pinnock says that "we are co-workers with God, participating with him in what shall be hereafter" (page 20).</ref> Continuing the paradigm shift mentality, Pinnock says, "when I went to the Scriptures with this question in mind, I found more support than I had expected." <ref name = "pinnock"></ref>{{Rp\|25}}		Interestingly, another writer in the same volume in which Pinnock's article appeared, Fritz Guy, also refers to the "paradigm shift" which occurred in his own study.<ref>Fritz Guy, "The Universality of God's Love," in ''The Grace of God and the Will of Man'', edited by Clark Pinnock (Minneapolis, Minnesota: Bethany House Publishers, 1989), 35. Could this 'paradigm shift,' which necessitates a re-reading of the Bible, which then results in a new understanding of the Bible, be anything like that which the First Presidency of the Church wrote in their Christmas Message of 1910: "Men must be susceptible to truth in order to receive truth." [{{Book:Clark:Messages of the First Presidency 4\|pages=220}}] To receive new light one must first rid oneself of the old darkness. Compare also Crawford Knox, ''Changing Christian Paradigms and their Implications for Modern Thought'' (Leiden, Netherlands: E.J. Brill, 1993).</ref> The fifth change Pinnock found necessary was "the atoning work of Christ. The easy part was accepting the obvious fact that contrary to Calvinian logic Jesus died for the sins of the whole world according to the New Testament." He began by asking where the element of human response fit into the new theme. He first concluded "if Christ really took away the guilt of the sins of the race, is the whole race then not now justified by virtue of that fact?" Unfortunately, he decided that was 'too' universalistic for him. "Christ's death on behalf of the race evidently did not automatically secure for anyone an actual reconciled relationship with God, but made it possible for people to enter into such a relationship by faith."<ref name = "pinnock"></ref>{{Rp\|22-23}} <ref>The last line is a theme that runs throughout the papers in the volume edited by Pinnock, and is consistent with the LDS position: Pinnock says that "we are co-workers with God, participating with him in what shall be hereafter" (page 20).</ref> Continuing the paradigm shift mentality, Pinnock says, "when I went to the Scriptures with this question in mind, I found more support than I had expected." <ref name = "pinnock"></ref>{{Rp\|25}}

	Clark Pinnock's comments near the end of his paper are applicable to the attitude that McKeever and Johnson take to the discussion of another's religion. Pinnock writes: "I guess it is time for evangelicals to grow up and recognize that evangelical theology is not an uncontested body of timeless truth." He continues a little further on:		Clark Pinnock's comments near the end of his paper are applicable to the attitude that McKeever and Johnson take to the discussion of another's religion. Pinnock writes: "I guess it is time for evangelicals to grow up and recognize that evangelical theology is not an uncontested body of timeless truth." He continues a little further on:

FairMormonBot: Bot: Automated text replacement (-\#\* +#)

2017-10-15T22:39:20Z

Bot: Automated text replacement (-\#\* +#)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 15 October 2017
Line 40:		Line 40:
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>
	\|authorsources=<br>		\|authorsources=<br>
	#*{{JDfairwiki\|author=Heber C. Kimball\|vol=6\|disc=4\|start=32}}		#{{JDfairwiki\|author=Heber C. Kimball\|vol=6\|disc=4\|start=32}}
	*Gordon B. Hinckley, address to Ricks College regional conference, 29 October 1995, quoted in ''Ensign'' (April 1996), 73.		*Gordon B. Hinckley, address to Ricks College regional conference, 29 October 1995, quoted in ''Ensign'' (April 1996), 73.
	*"Mormon President Warns Students of Pornography, Criticizing Church Leaders," ''Salt Lake Tribune'', 27 January 1996, p. C1.		*"Mormon President Warns Students of Pornography, Criticizing Church Leaders," ''Salt Lake Tribune'', 27 January 1996, p. C1.
Line 58:		Line 58:
	In the area of doctrine and interpreting scripture for doctrinal purposes, the authors attempt to paint a picture of restriction for members of the Church. They frame this painting with the idea that members are not allowed to "[trust] in their own rationale." The authors portray Church leaders as those who do not permit freethinking in scripture interpretation and do not allow the members to declare doctrine for themselves.		In the area of doctrine and interpreting scripture for doctrinal purposes, the authors attempt to paint a picture of restriction for members of the Church. They frame this painting with the idea that members are not allowed to "[trust] in their own rationale." The authors portray Church leaders as those who do not permit freethinking in scripture interpretation and do not allow the members to declare doctrine for themselves.
	\|authorsources=<br>		\|authorsources=<br>
	#*''Ensign'', (November 1994), 63,65.		#''Ensign'', (November 1994), 63,65.
	}}		}}
	{{propaganda\|		{{propaganda\|
Line 83:		Line 83:
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>
	\|authorsources=<br>		\|authorsources=<br>
	#*Ezra Taft Benson, "The Gospel Teacher and His Message," 51-52, quoted in ''Teachings of the Living Prophets'', 25.		#Ezra Taft Benson, "The Gospel Teacher and His Message," 51-52, quoted in ''Teachings of the Living Prophets'', 25.
	}}		}}
	{{misinformation\|		{{misinformation\|
Line 122:		Line 122:
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>
	\|authorsources=<br>		\|authorsources=<br>
	#*Clay Chandler, speaking at the "LDS Sunstone Symposium" on 8 August 1997.		#Clay Chandler, speaking at the "LDS Sunstone Symposium" on 8 August 1997.
	}}		}}
	{{misinformation\|		{{misinformation\|
Line 283:		Line 283:
	Brigham Young taught that Adam was God, but this has been relegated to "theory."		Brigham Young taught that Adam was God, but this has been relegated to "theory."
	\|authorsources=<br>		\|authorsources=<br>
	#*{{JDfairwiki\|author=Brigham Young\|vol=1\|disc=8\|start=50}}		#{{JDfairwiki\|author=Brigham Young\|vol=1\|disc=8\|start=50}}
	}}		}}
	{{information\|This is correct. The Adam-God theory was never accepted as Church doctrine.}}		{{information\|This is correct. The Adam-God theory was never accepted as Church doctrine.}}
Line 296:		Line 296:
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>
	\|authorsources=<br>		\|authorsources=<br>
	#*{{JDfairwiki\|author=Brigham Young\|vol=11\|disc=43\|start=286}}		#{{JDfairwiki\|author=Brigham Young\|vol=11\|disc=43\|start=286}}
	*McConkie, [[Primary sources/Seven deadly heresies\|"Seven Deadly Heresies]]," (speech given at BYU), 1 June 1980.		*McConkie, [[Primary sources/Seven deadly heresies\|"Seven Deadly Heresies]]," (speech given at BYU), 1 June 1980.
	}}		}}

FairMormonBot: Bot: Automated text replacement (-\|authorsources=\n* +|authorsources=
\n#)

2017-10-13T03:36:15Z

Bot: Automated text replacement (-\|authorsources=\n* +|authorsources=<br>\n#)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:36, 13 October 2017
Line 39:		Line 39:
	Never let yourselves be found in the position of fighting The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. You cling to it and be faithful to it. You uphold and sustain it. You teach its doctrines and live by it. And I do not hesitate to say that your lives will be the richer and happier because of that. You cannot find happiness fighting the work of God.		Never let yourselves be found in the position of fighting The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. You cling to it and be faithful to it. You uphold and sustain it. You teach its doctrines and live by it. And I do not hesitate to say that your lives will be the richer and happier because of that. You cannot find happiness fighting the work of God.
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>
	\|authorsources=		\|authorsources=<br>
	*{{JDfairwiki\|author=Heber C. Kimball\|vol=6\|disc=4\|start=32}}		#*{{JDfairwiki\|author=Heber C. Kimball\|vol=6\|disc=4\|start=32}}
	*Gordon B. Hinckley, address to Ricks College regional conference, 29 October 1995, quoted in ''Ensign'' (April 1996), 73.		*Gordon B. Hinckley, address to Ricks College regional conference, 29 October 1995, quoted in ''Ensign'' (April 1996), 73.
	*"Mormon President Warns Students of Pornography, Criticizing Church Leaders," ''Salt Lake Tribune'', 27 January 1996, p. C1.		*"Mormon President Warns Students of Pornography, Criticizing Church Leaders," ''Salt Lake Tribune'', 27 January 1996, p. C1.
Line 57:		Line 57:
	\|claim=		\|claim=
	In the area of doctrine and interpreting scripture for doctrinal purposes, the authors attempt to paint a picture of restriction for members of the Church. They frame this painting with the idea that members are not allowed to "[trust] in their own rationale." The authors portray Church leaders as those who do not permit freethinking in scripture interpretation and do not allow the members to declare doctrine for themselves.		In the area of doctrine and interpreting scripture for doctrinal purposes, the authors attempt to paint a picture of restriction for members of the Church. They frame this painting with the idea that members are not allowed to "[trust] in their own rationale." The authors portray Church leaders as those who do not permit freethinking in scripture interpretation and do not allow the members to declare doctrine for themselves.
	\|authorsources=		\|authorsources=<br>
	*''Ensign'', (November 1994), 63,65.		#*''Ensign'', (November 1994), 63,65.
	}}		}}
	{{propaganda\|		{{propaganda\|
Line 82:		Line 82:
	Doctrinal interpretation is the province of the First Presidency. The Lord has given that stewardship to them by revelation. No teacher has the right to interpret doctrine for the members of the Church.		Doctrinal interpretation is the province of the First Presidency. The Lord has given that stewardship to them by revelation. No teacher has the right to interpret doctrine for the members of the Church.
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>
	\|authorsources=		\|authorsources=<br>
	*Ezra Taft Benson, "The Gospel Teacher and His Message," 51-52, quoted in ''Teachings of the Living Prophets'', 25.		#*Ezra Taft Benson, "The Gospel Teacher and His Message," 51-52, quoted in ''Teachings of the Living Prophets'', 25.
	}}		}}
	{{misinformation\|		{{misinformation\|
Line 121:		Line 121:
	Some seem to think that they (LDS Leaders) will be forgiven and the issue will be forgotten. Speaking at an LDS Sunstone Symposium on 8 August 1997, Clay Chandler said, 'Our leaders can be forgiven for occasionally deceiving us if they don't violate our trust." Some Christians may not completely understand such rationale, but it must be remembered that for Mormons, rejecting the prophet and other church leaders is akin to rejecting God Himself.		Some seem to think that they (LDS Leaders) will be forgiven and the issue will be forgotten. Speaking at an LDS Sunstone Symposium on 8 August 1997, Clay Chandler said, 'Our leaders can be forgiven for occasionally deceiving us if they don't violate our trust." Some Christians may not completely understand such rationale, but it must be remembered that for Mormons, rejecting the prophet and other church leaders is akin to rejecting God Himself.
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>
	\|authorsources=		\|authorsources=<br>
	*Clay Chandler, speaking at the "LDS Sunstone Symposium" on 8 August 1997.		#*Clay Chandler, speaking at the "LDS Sunstone Symposium" on 8 August 1997.
	}}		}}
	{{misinformation\|		{{misinformation\|
Line 145:		Line 145:
	At the conclusion of the October 1994 general conference, President Howard W. Hunter proclaimed: 'Let us study their words [the prophets and other general authorities], spoken under the Spirit of inspiration, and refer to them often. The Lord has revealed his will to the Saints in this conference.' While the Mormon leaders may say that they and their organization are above reproach, such a position of ultimate authoritarianism is not a New Testament trait.		At the conclusion of the October 1994 general conference, President Howard W. Hunter proclaimed: 'Let us study their words [the prophets and other general authorities], spoken under the Spirit of inspiration, and refer to them often. The Lord has revealed his will to the Saints in this conference.' While the Mormon leaders may say that they and their organization are above reproach, such a position of ultimate authoritarianism is not a New Testament trait.
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>
	\|authorsources=		\|authorsources=<br>
	Hunter, ''Ensign'' (November 1994), 87.		#Hunter, ''Ensign'' (November 1994), 87.
	}}		}}
	{{misinformation\|		{{misinformation\|
Line 282:		Line 282:
	\|claim=		\|claim=
	Brigham Young taught that Adam was God, but this has been relegated to "theory."		Brigham Young taught that Adam was God, but this has been relegated to "theory."
	\|authorsources=		\|authorsources=<br>
	*{{JDfairwiki\|author=Brigham Young\|vol=1\|disc=8\|start=50}}		#*{{JDfairwiki\|author=Brigham Young\|vol=1\|disc=8\|start=50}}
	}}		}}
	{{information\|This is correct. The Adam-God theory was never accepted as Church doctrine.}}		{{information\|This is correct. The Adam-God theory was never accepted as Church doctrine.}}
Line 295:		Line 295:
	The authors quote Brigham Young stating that God is "progressing eternally," which is consistent with Wilford Woodruff's remarks that God is "increasing and progressing." These statements are contrasted, by the authors, with the more recent views expressed by Joseph Fielding Smith and Bruce R. McConkie that God's knowledge and power is full and complete. Smith said God "knows all things and that his understanding is perfect," while McConkie is quoted as saying God is not "progressing in knowledge," and is not "learning new truth."		The authors quote Brigham Young stating that God is "progressing eternally," which is consistent with Wilford Woodruff's remarks that God is "increasing and progressing." These statements are contrasted, by the authors, with the more recent views expressed by Joseph Fielding Smith and Bruce R. McConkie that God's knowledge and power is full and complete. Smith said God "knows all things and that his understanding is perfect," while McConkie is quoted as saying God is not "progressing in knowledge," and is not "learning new truth."
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>
	\|authorsources=		\|authorsources=<br>
	*{{JDfairwiki\|author=Brigham Young\|vol=11\|disc=43\|start=286}}		#*{{JDfairwiki\|author=Brigham Young\|vol=11\|disc=43\|start=286}}
	*McConkie, [[Primary sources/Seven deadly heresies\|"Seven Deadly Heresies]]," (speech given at BYU), 1 June 1980.		*McConkie, [[Primary sources/Seven deadly heresies\|"Seven Deadly Heresies]]," (speech given at BYU), 1 June 1980.
	}}		}}

RogerNicholson at 15:23, 6 July 2017

2017-07-06T15:23:24Z

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 |H=Response to claims made in Mormonism 101, "Chapter 18: The Church and Its Leadership"
 |S=
-|L1=
+|L1=Response to claim: 264-268 - The authors conclude that trusting in these men, their teachings and their counsel, is a foolish and destructive path
 }}
 </onlyinclude>
 ==Response to claim: 264-268 - The authors conclude that trusting in these men, their teachings and their counsel, is a foolish and destructive path==

RogerNicholson at 15:22, 6 July 2017

2017-07-06T15:22:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 6 July 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{FairMormon}}		{{FairMormon}}
	{{H1		{{H1
	\|L=~~{{check}}~~		\|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Mormonism 101/Chapter 18
	\|H=Response to claims made in "Chapter 18: The Church and Its Leadership"		\|H=Response to claims made in "Chapter 18: The Church and Its Leadership"
	\|S=		\|S=
Line 10:		Line 10:
	\|>=		\|>=
	}}		}}
			<!-- INSERT CHART HERE -->
			<onlyinclude>
			{{H2
			\|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Mormonism 101/Chapter 18
			\|H=Response to claims made in Mormonism 101, "Chapter 18: The Church and Its Leadership"
			\|S=
			\|L1=
			}}
			</onlyinclude>
	==Quick Navigation==		==Quick Navigation==
	*[[Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Mormonism 101/Chapter 18#Response to claim: 264-268 - The authors conclude that trusting in these men, their teachings and their counsel, is a foolish and destructive path\|Response to claim: 264-268 - The authors conclude that trusting in these men, their teachings and their counsel, is a foolish and destructive path]]		*[[Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Mormonism 101/Chapter 18#Response to claim: 264-268 - The authors conclude that trusting in these men, their teachings and their counsel, is a foolish and destructive path\|Response to claim: 264-268 - The authors conclude that trusting in these men, their teachings and their counsel, is a foolish and destructive path]]

FairMormonBot: Bot: Automated text replacement (-\|H1 +|H)

2017-06-26T20:37:33Z

Bot: Automated text replacement (-\|H1 +|H)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 26 June 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{H1		{{H1
	\|L={{check}}		\|L={{check}}
	\|H1=Response to claims made in "Chapter 18: The Church and Its Leadership"		\|H=Response to claims made in "Chapter 18: The Church and Its Leadership"
	\|S=		\|S=
	\|L1=		\|L1=

FairMormonBot: Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{H2\n\|L(.)\n\|H2(.)\n(.)\n(.)\n\|T +{{H1\n|L\1\n|H1\2\n\3\n\4\n|T)

2017-06-10T03:08:38Z

Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{H2\n\|L(.*)\n\|H2(.*)\n(.*)\n(.*)\n\|T +{{H1\n|L\1\n|H1\2\n\3\n\4\n|T)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:08, 10 June 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{FairMormon}}		{{FairMormon}}
	{{H2		{{H1
	\|L={{check}}		\|L={{check}}
	\|H2=Response to claims made in "Chapter 18: The Church and Its Leadership"		\|H1=Response to claims made in "Chapter 18: The Church and Its Leadership"
	\|S=		\|S=
	\|L1=		\|L1=

FairMormonBot: Bot: Automated text replacement (-}}\n{{FAIRAnalysisHeader\n\|title=(.)\n\|author=(.)\n(.)\n(.)\n\|previous=(.)\n\|next=(.)\n(.*)\n}} +|T=\1\n|A=\2\n|<=\5\n|>=\6\n}})

2017-06-10T01:28:37Z

Bot: Automated text replacement (-}}\n{{FAIRAnalysisHeader\n\|title=(.*)\n\|author=(.*)\n(.*)\n(.*)\n\|previous=(.*)\n\|next=(.*)\n(.*)\n}} +|T=\1\n|A=\2\n|<=\5\n|>=\6\n}})

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:28, 10 June 2017
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\|S=		\|S=
	\|L1=		\|L1=
	}}		\|T=[[../../\|Mormonism 101]]
	~~{{FAIRAnalysisHeader~~		\|A=Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson
	\|~~title~~=[[../../\|Mormonism 101]]		\|<=[[../Chapter 17\|Chapter 17: Joseph Smith]]
	\|~~author~~=Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson		\|>=
	\|~~noauthor=~~
	~~\|section=[[../\|Index]], Claims made in "Chapter 18: The Church and Its Leadership"~~
	~~\|previous~~=[[../Chapter 17\|Chapter 17: Joseph Smith]]
	\|~~next=~~
	~~\|notes~~=~~{{AuthorsDisclaimer}}~~
	}}		}}
	==Quick Navigation==		==Quick Navigation==

FairMormonBot: Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Resource Title\|(.*)}} +{{H2\n|L={{check}}\n|H2=\1\n|S=\n|L1=\n}})

2017-06-09T16:19:22Z

Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Resource Title\|(.*)}} +{{H2\n|L={{check}}\n|H2=\1\n|S=\n|L1=\n}})

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 9 June 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{FairMormon}}		{{FairMormon}}
	{{~~Resource Title~~\|Response to claims made in "Chapter 18: The Church and Its Leadership"}}		{{H2
			\|L={{check}}
			\|H2=Response to claims made in "Chapter 18: The Church and Its Leadership"
			\|S=
			\|L1=
			}}
	{{FAIRAnalysisHeader		{{FAIRAnalysisHeader
	\|title=[[../../\|Mormonism 101]]		\|title=[[../../\|Mormonism 101]]